Kwick1

Lives in United States Seattle, United States
Joined on Sep 20, 2009

Comments

Total: 84, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Interesting that none of the scene modes are for Underwater.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2018 at 15:00 UTC as 66th comment
On article Video: Canon shows off its new 120MP APS-H CMOS sensor (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

nickolas84: We have had similar pixel densities in cellphones for years! Why is it so difficult to deliver this as a consumer product?

Canon better step up their game, otherwise Sony and Samsung will take over!

Yes! Samsung's camera market share is skyrocketing! Wait...what? I guess they got out of the camera business at the top of their game.

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2018 at 19:52 UTC

Sure wish I could buy one here in the U.S.

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2018 at 16:12 UTC as 95th comment

Wait - first you say (and show) that it has serious banding issues in backlight, then you meet with Sony Marketing execs and suddenly everything is looking good? Anything for those affiliate dollars, I guess. Wouldn’t want to make Sony mad by doing an honest review.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2018 at 20:22 UTC as 79th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

PhozoKozmos: improving LV-technology is what matters
as it applies to both integrated lens dcams and icl dcams
likewise, it applies to mirror-capable LV dSLR-dcams and non-mirror-(mirrorless)-only dcams

tech for mirrorless-only dcams (integrated-lens or icl) is less demanding as it deals with processing incoming image light full-time

tech for mirror-capable OVF+LV dSLRs is more demanding where dual-optional shooting is available:

▪any AF system during OVF shooting must act within shorter timeframe part-time when mirror provides light path to AF sensor

▪any AF system during LV (non-mirror/mirror-up/mirrorless-only) shooting has the luxury of full-timeframe when light is "always" available to image sensor, where either PDAF or CDAF is being used

mfrs, like Canon, can do both AF (fast OVF or fast LV), have the advantage

mfrs, like Canon, have both AF (PDAF and CDAF) on image sensor*, have the advantage

Canon, uniquely has both proprietary ExpSimLV AF and Aperture stop-down LV-AF, has advantage

What the heck is an "icl dcam"?

And if you're complaining about Live View, there is no such term in mirrorless. It's just an electronic viewfinder. And if you think it blacks out, you've obviously never tried the A9.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2018 at 18:59 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Sony a7 III (584 comments in total)

The fact that the AF points don't light up is a deal-breaker for me. That, plus when you hold the grip, my knuckles bump up against the 24-105 lens. There's not much room between the grip and the lens.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2018 at 18:17 UTC as 63rd comment | 12 replies

Canon finally realized, like Sony, that money is money, no matter which camera line it comes from.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2018 at 16:32 UTC as 139th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic officially unveils 50-200mm F2.8-4.0 ASPH (303 comments in total)
In reply to:

BarnET: For the price of this lens you could buy a X-T20/X-E3 with not one but 2 almost comparable zooms.

X-T20 +18-55 f2.8-4 = 1199
55-200 F3.5-4.8 = 699

And then people call Fujinon lenses expensive

Fuji is not full frame. APS-C.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2018 at 03:29 UTC

But how does it work with adapted Canon lenses?

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 05:14 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic officially unveils 50-200mm F2.8-4.0 ASPH (303 comments in total)

I just ordered the Olympus 40-150 2.8. Amazing lens, but now this...

Panny is compatible with Dual IS 2 in my G85, but the Oly is constant 2.8. Panny has longer reach and is lighter (slightly - 1.44lbs vs 1.67).

Decisions decisions.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 17:48 UTC as 47th comment | 1 reply

Hmmmm. Amazon shows Body Only at $2199, not $1999 like it says in your article.
http://amzn.to/2odVQrq

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2018 at 22:52 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply

Sadly, no improvement in autofocus, I do like the handheld hi-res though.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2018 at 22:49 UTC as 67th comment | 4 replies
On article Fujifilm X-H1 Review (1570 comments in total)

The lack of an exposure compensation dial is a deal-breaker for me. And a bigger grip, extra weight, but no larger battery? Why? Missed opportunity, in my opinion.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2018 at 05:51 UTC as 336th comment | 6 replies

Just regular Dual IS? Not Dual IS 2?

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2018 at 13:17 UTC as 48th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix G9 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 II (257 comments in total)

Oh...one other difference: DP Review thinks the Olympus EM1 Mark II is fantastic and well deserving of a Gold award. Whereas the Panasonic G9 is just mediocre and gets a Silver. Geesh.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2018 at 01:54 UTC as 30th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Review (1025 comments in total)

Ridiculous conclusion. Goes against your own grading system. "Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category.". Well, the camera in this category is the EM1 II, and it got Gold.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2018 at 16:02 UTC as 98th comment | 12 replies
On article Portrait mode shootout: iPhone 8 Plus vs Google Pixel 2 (155 comments in total)

I’m curious how the iPhone X would compare.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2017 at 16:05 UTC as 48th comment | 3 replies

“One of?” Which one is better?

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2017 at 18:30 UTC as 152nd comment | 1 reply
On article 2017 Roundup: Consumer Long Zoom Compacts (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

Yoopershooter: Cameras have been made over 100 years and no one can or will not produce one without basic deficiencies? Consumers have to settle for the best of the worst.
Why will not one manufacturer take the bull by the horns?
It is not hard to figure out what the consumer wants...just ask! Just looking at camera reviews and correct the problems. Consumers are asked to spend a lot of $$$$ for cameras and I do not think it is wrong to expect our $$$$ worth. I say again,"If they cannot sell the product, they will wrap it in Baloney and sell the Baloney. ".
I have spent a couple weeks researching cameras and cannot find what I want within by budget, which is under $1000 and that to me is ridiculous.
I am searching for primarily an action camera for events my five grandchildren are or will be in. Events as Baseball, Track, Soccer, Football, Gymnastics and Basketball and ???.
Any advice or opinions? Thank You.

Get a Sony A6000 kit with the standard plus 55-200 zoom. Perfect for action, huge sensor (compared to these) and great image quality. Small, light kit and can be had for well under $1000, especially with the sales on now. Gordon at Cameralabs shot the Tour de France with it and it performed brilliantly.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2017 at 18:15 UTC

Nice to see you stole my idea after my interview.

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2017 at 21:02 UTC as 32nd comment | 7 replies
Total: 84, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »