brujo74

Joined on Apr 19, 2012

Comments

Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

Shocking! A pic won a photography contest!

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2016 at 09:54 UTC as 12th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

LMCasey: I don't understand the rationale for this lens. A fast ultrawide zoom for APS-C. Like other posters have said, why not a prime, and why not even faster so that you can isolate the background. Unless you are very close to your subject, the fast aperture still won't give a satisfying background blur at f2. DOF is still surprisingly deep at large apertures with AOV this wide.

Considering it's focal range, this is not a portrait lens, so if you want bokeh you might look elsewhere. I'd use this one in available light when I don't want to crank up the ISO setting. You can find f/2.2 glass on cell-phones, do you expect blurred background?

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2016 at 20:06 UTC
In reply to:

white shadow: Finally, Ricoh is moving in the right direction making a full frame camera. Making a high quality full frame 70-200mm f/2.8 lens is a good indication they are serious. Let's hope they won't take too long to make it happen.

Ricoh has a tradition of making very photographer-centric cameras like the Ricoh GR. Let's hope this new entry would give Canikon a run for their money.

@ AlexisH I have to disagree here. Pentax (Ricoh) has increased it's market share since K5ll/K5lls and K30/K50 hit the shelves. They are selling more than they did back in the days of K10/K20. K3 is selling just fine also, and it deserves that. Pentax is a very attractive choice for someone not yet involved in a system

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 15:41 UTC
On article Pentax K-3 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

paulski66: Well, on the plus side, at least we won't have to read any more posts from all the Pentax fanboys complaining "Where's the K-3 review?" every time DPReview posts a review of any other camera.

Nikon D4 doesn't need a review, paulski66 !

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 22:48 UTC
On article Pentax K-3 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

Danyel39: Hi I own a K-5 ( Silver ) and one month ago I received my K-3 ( Silver ).
I don't know what will be the future of APS-C but I'm unhappy with the results of the Image Quality Compared. Olympus is almost there, for my personal opinion D7100 is performing better and when compared to Sony 7R........
I photograph mainly during the night ( color rendition and low light capabilities are crucial ) and I'm starting to think that maybe time has come to sell everything and check both Nikon ( D4s, DF, D400 ? , ) and Sony 7R.
K-5 was my first camera and loved it but it seems to me the future is going into another directions. Image quality of Sony is unbeatable. low light capabilities of some nikons also. Don't know.
Can someone cast light on my considerations ?

Hi! I'm not very happy with Sony's IQ, let alone low-light performance. I've tested an Alpha65 some time ago and it was nowhere near my K-5 in both respects. I don't know about the new ones, haven't seen them with my own eyes. You can't go wrong with Nikon's D4s, but that's in another league (pricewise too). I think your best bet would be a Nikon D3s if you can get it for a good price.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 22:44 UTC
In reply to:

danijel973: I see no advantage of this method compared to registering your equipment on manufacturer's website for reference in case of theft.

True!

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2013 at 18:22 UTC

this could prove wrong and have a major impact on their sales as many ppl buy canikons thinking of coutless solutions offered by the used (sh) gear market.

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2013 at 18:19 UTC as 17th comment
On a photo in the Canon EOS-M preview samples sample gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

RawDogg: Next time don't shoot it with the Exposure comp. set to -2.33 for a night shot.

I guess one could get the same picture in M mode keeping those aperture/shuttervalues, setting exposure comp to 0 and lowering the ISO to, let's say, 800. And with a lot less noise. Am I wrong?

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2012 at 20:45 UTC
On photo IMG_0899-ACR in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)
In reply to:

RawDogg: Next time don't shoot it with the Exposure comp. set to -2.33 for a night shot.

I guess one could get the same picture in M mode keeping those aperture/shuttervalues, setting exposure comp to 0 and lowering the ISO to, let's say, 800. And with a lot less noise. Am I wrong?

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2012 at 20:45 UTC
In reply to:

Andy Dufresne: - Big body for my big hands,
- Variety of prime lenses from wide angle to tele range.
- Min. APS-C size senzor
- long shutter life (100K+)
- Low noise at high iso
- Fast Autofocus
- Internal focus motor in the body
- HD video with full manual controls

Except for the first and last line you've described the Pentax K-5 :)

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:29 UTC
On photo DSC00116 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

At last, a nice little camera!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:33 UTC as 4th comment
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 Preview Samples sample gallery (4 comments in total)

At last, a nice little camera!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:33 UTC as 4th comment
On a photo in the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 Preview Samples sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Looks ok to me

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 1st comment
On photo DSC00128 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Looks ok to me

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:32 UTC as 1st comment
On photo DSC00060 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Hmm, impressive!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:20 UTC as 2nd comment
On a photo in the Sony Alpha SLT-A99 Preview Samples sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Hmm, impressive!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:20 UTC as 2nd comment
On photo DSC00040 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Pretty good hi-ISO behaviour!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:17 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Sony Alpha SLT-A99 Preview Samples sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Pretty good hi-ISO behaviour!

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 14:17 UTC as 1st comment
On article Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms (613 comments in total)
In reply to:

sephir: LOL http://i.imgur.com/2Dq4K.jpg

LOL http://i.imgur.com/iAxhL.jpg

@Shamael : considering your name, I should expect such reaction :/

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 12:25 UTC
In reply to:

topstuff: The amount of hate here is really bizarre. It reflects more on the people with such feelings of hate than it reflects on Leica.

Leica lenses are terrific. And I like the small form factor.

And I like the look of the pictures from a CCD sensor.

If Leica want to charge what they do, let them. You don't have to buy one.

By the same token, why buy an Audi when you can buy a VW? A small Golf and an Audi A3 , A4 have the same mechanicals. Why buy a nice watch? A Casio will do.

I don't hate Leica, i just hate their prices! I can understand paying a premium for their excellent glass, but not for their obsolete cameras. I fully agree with you on CCD sensors, the pictures look better.

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 12:15 UTC
Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »