RPJG

No. Use whatever works for your use case. If your 100-400 gives acceptable image quality / focus / etc with an adapter, and you otherwise like the mirrorless bodies, then go for it.

Acceptable...

*retain

I know what you mean, but that's normally a standalone logo. This one is buried inside the battery symbol, so it more likely(?) has the meaning ascribed to it by DPR.

"There isn't a full-frame camera on the market that can shoot Raw+JPEG frames at 60fps"

They kind of imply that this is a benefit of 4/3. But for mirrorless cameras, surely this just depends on...

Which program do you find makes the masking process easier than what you've found with ON1?

panther fan I haven't checked in on mirrorless autofocus for a while... which other mirrorless cameras are you referring to? Do you mean other m4/3 cameras, or just... any mirrorless?

"In addition to tiny dimensions the new sensor offers, when used in front facing cameras, Samsung’s Tetracell technology, which merges four pixels to work as one for brighter exposures and less...

I don't disagree with you, but the labelling shows it as V30/U3, telling you what you need to know. Anyone who cares about write speeds should surely know what to look for?

OBI656: Huh? Opinions on DPR are all over the shop. Which is as it should be, given the mostly subjective nature of the topic(s), and the fact that there obviously *are* pro photographers here. ...

moTmeN, huh? He said "there is NO other software which may come close. Period", for anyone making a living from photography. If that's not over-generalising (and false), I don't know what...

Hmm, yes, Instagram, iPhones, very interesting...

The point is, there isn't a "best", because the best is subjective and/or dependent on the source gear. So when I see pompous posts on here...

lauma and OBI656, what you both say is simply wrong, although I suspect you both realise that.

You only have to read through this thread, let alone elsewhere, to know that different...

Thank you Jake, a nice chuckle to start my day!

Lol, the old "Something that works best for me, must work best for everyone else".

HR: no. You're reading what you want to read.

Where did he even remotely imply that?

Are Lomography based in Hong Kong?

I'm not a cinematographer, but why is everyone just assuming there needs to be scaling? Surely the extra vertical resolution can come in handy when framing shots, or for PP?

It's always amusing when someone is 100% wrong, is gently corrected, and then doubles-down on his original statement with sarcasm, arrogance and ad-hominems.

Valiant commenters try to explain his...

To be fair, he didn't say XQD cards are crappy. He just thinks they'll "fail in the consumer segment" due to being proprietary.