boy_wander

The fakeness from this is no different than sky replacements or adding light leaks or doing day to night post processing. I use my mirrorless over my phone for my own enjoyment whether or not...

I've been back and forth between XT3 and A7iii so I borrowed both from friends and this is my first impressions. Now mind you I started with Nikon FF then went to Sony APSC for my mirrorless ...

You gotta start doing bicep curls with the Sigma 18-35 so build up the strength to vlog with this gimbal. Plus I heard that lens has great optics, I definitely recommend it :)

Sony will not match XT3. It will be more expensive and a different class. Its most likely going to be for wildlife and sports so yeah high burst rate but I doubt the video specs will match XT3. ...

Has anyone tried using the e-shutter for 30 fps burst mode to make video? That's effectively a 6k RAW resolution and possibly way better DR than F log. This would be perfect slow moving subjects ...

Sony is really good at being first and I admire them for that, but Fuji demonstrated in the past that they are in it for the long run. If Sony was purely APSC I'd have a different opinion but it's ...

I'm an a6500 user and will be upgrading to the XT3 over the A7iii. I lost hope for Sony APSC and Fuji even beats out the A7iii for me. I'm a hybrid shooter and as far as stills go a6500 is more ...

I think there has to be a clear distinction between stills and video with regards to color science. But I'd he happy to be proven wrong if any colorist out there can make my Sony produce arri ...

I've used over 10 diff color profiles slog2 / cine4s, some I even paid for and for me personally F log (Fuji log profile) is the easiest to grade without any penalty

This is only applicable to stills. But for video color science does matter especially with 8 bit sub sampling since you can't push colors too much.

I'm going to piggy back on this thread and ask if it really is just a matter of accepting LR and Fuji will never play nice together. Or is there a viable solution to make them play along. ...

Not to feed the trolls or anything but Fuji isn't a better value than say the FF alternative. And that's not necessarily a bad thing. Cost is just one of the many factors to consider because there ...

I'm in the same boat (currently an a6500 user looking to upgrade) so ultimately this is how I'm approaching it based on my needs and preferences. A7iii  vs XT3 (Canadian prices) Body: Price -  2.6k ...

I don't think Sony can match XT3. Sony has the same problem as canon. Their milcs will always be held back to protect their dedicated cinema line (FS7 /c300) whereas Fuji doesn't have any worry of ...

Total false. It's all about shooting wide open and getting the DoF of an eyelash. Besides obliterating background and turning it into creamy goodness renders background planning and composition...

To be honest I kinda regret buying my 851.8. It probably only got used for 10 mins and it was for testing purposes. I've not had the opportunity to use it because I often never have room to move ...

I agree its cumbersome. But after a while you get used to it. I hike mountains in our travel (Patagonia, Norway, greenland) but I managed to develop my own system of balancing it better. I have ...

I'm not a sports or wildlife photographer so what I'd want as an upgrade from my a6500 is better video specs since stills is already good enough.  I don't think IBIS is enough to win people over ...

Hello, Been a long-time lurker of the Fuji forum but I'm 98% convinced of divorcing my Sony system due to Sony's clear abandonment of their APSC system. Knowing that the XT3 has everyone I could ...

Very helpful thread. I have resolve 15.1 and I don't use proxies on my Sony files. However one of the many reasons I may want to switch to Fuji is their codecs. I don't mind transcoding it since I ...