Lives in Italy Italy
Joined on Jan 19, 2006


Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
In reply to:

MrTaikitso: Does not surprise me. I have owned a Note 4, Galaxy S6, S7 and now a Note5, and both the still and video images are OUTSTANDING and tack sharp too. Main difference between the most recent devices is they focus a LOT faster and handle low light better.

It's no wonder Samsung's regular camera division failed, their phone camera tech obsoleted a lot of the models, the NX1 the only exception. All said, the 4K video from my Note5 is hard to differentiate from footage shot on GH4s and the like in daylight. Don't believe me? Hit and click through to the YouTube channel and view the footage shot on my Note5.

All said, I wish they would release a successor to the best camera I ever owned, the EX2F. f1.4 lens took superb pics & video in all conditions. A 4K version with a viewfinder would have got my money. (My only gripe with phones is the lack of a viewfinder for composing in bright sunlight or street covert photographer and tactile controls.)

How does the camera on the note 4 compare with the S7? For stills

Link | Posted on May 15, 2017 at 21:00 UTC

I hope soon they will put at least 2 x 2 camera at different focal lenght

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2016 at 17:55 UTC as 13th comment
On article Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 (305 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hen3ry: Not interested. No built-in flash.

I prefere a tiltable build in flash for this kind of camera!

The could have al leat included one with a titable head!

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 13:07 UTC
On article Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review (1200 comments in total)

Does in-body IS work in video mode?

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 06:10 UTC as 403rd comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Preview (101 comments in total)

Why this over the GF2?

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2013 at 04:23 UTC as 38th comment | 7 replies

I just bought the suit and it works.
However I did not get any activation code or license number.
Is it normal?

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 20:44 UTC as 47th comment

It looks the same sensor form SX230HS, from two years ago.
Overall in terms of image quality should be pretty much the same.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 11:23 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply

Hopefully they have sorted the focusing issue in video while zooming and improved noise performance

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 06:35 UTC as 14th comment
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V review (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

Osiris30: " At ISO 1600 the HX100V begins to outpace most of its rivals, striking a pleasing balance between noise suppression and image detail and relatively little in the way of artifacts. "

Are we *really* looking at the same output. There's no detail left at all in the medallions on the bottle. For my money the Canon strikes the best balance. Remember those medallions have thin horizontal lines on them....

Also if you look at the travel zoom comparison they seemed to prefer the canon output. All these cameras share the same sensor. I guess different reviewers have different metrics

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2011 at 08:03 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot S100 hands-on preview (165 comments in total)

I am actually happy that canon is using 1080p 24. It takes less space than 30p and also is more compatible with 50i and European standards

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 19:57 UTC as 35th comment
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11