Zabalint

Sony RX1 doesn't have a viewfinder (it can be attached as a module), it has a FF sensor and a 35 mm fixed lens. However it's quite expensive.

Yes, I can also do that, however in this case I can almost see anything outside of the EVF.

The OP composed his question wrong, but we all know what he wanted. You are not answering, you are just pointing on his fault.

This is what I call snobbish. Have you ever tried EVF with glasses?

You are actually trolling. There is a picture of a MILC in his post, and we can also suppose that he knows that DSLRs have OVF and not EVF.

OP is talking about a mirrorless evf-less FF camera.

If there are enough users, who don't use a feature, and this feature actually makes the device bigger, than it's a valid point to make a device that lacks this feature. There are cameras with ...

I almost never use EVF, even in bright weather it's less comfortable for me than LCD screen (I wear glasses), however I'm not interested in FF cameras, the largest sensor I consider is APS-C. ...

I don't think that there is an upper limit for photography. Actually the entry-limit is low, because of the phones, but you can spend as much as you can and want on travelling and buying newer and ...

Then why don't you use only a 28 mm eqv prime instead of the zoom lenses with your Nikon? Would you take a good picture of a bird or cow with the same phone, as you did of the cows?

Actually Affinity's raw processing adjustment tools are very good, however there is no batch processing and no no sidecar file to save the current settings. I think it's ok for someone, who shoots ...

There are cheaper and more expensive hobbies than photography, however in each hobby you make the decisions how much you spend on it. And as others have already written, the main cost of outdoor ...

Actually this was the original claim: This "and/or" means in this case simple logical OR, so it includes good daylight pictures, pictures taken with a tripod and pictures taken in a good daylight ...

However the deeper the DOF, the smaller are these advantages, as you will need higher ISO on the same shutter speed and DOF, because of the smaller aperture.

Sorry, if I misunderstood, but I understood cannot be flying as it cannot be a picture with a flying object/animal, so something with wings, but actually not flying in the picture should be ok.

Why?

In this topic the first answer to his comment: And that goes on in all the other threads. He claims something about himself, and then the trolls are questioning it, and attacking him. The same ...

Actually this is a natural reaction on bullying.