photo perzon

photo perzon

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Sep 8, 2010


Total: 362, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with new Fujifilm X-E3 (201 comments in total)

where is the fuji x80

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2017 at 06:57 UTC as 51st comment | 1 reply

Sony is simply a wrong one for portraits. Canon is too orange. Nikon is better. But Fuji is king. Best skin tones.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 03:31 UTC as 47th comment | 2 replies

I hate these historical I feel like buying the cameras again even though they are so old

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2017 at 22:59 UTC as 16th comment
On article Panasonic Leica DG 15mm F1.7 shooting experience (405 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo perzon: Typical poor Pana skin tones in the jpegs. Get a Fuji X70 instead. Make people look healthy.

Well of course you are right Ben. But it is my heart's belief that portrait or street photography of people is so much more inspiring that scenic. I mean scenic they have already at the gift shop that they paid some guy that dragged a 5 pound camera with a three pound lens and a 20 pound tripod and that scene is really the same almost. People photos are why we are reading this forum late at night. True scenic pros don't read forums, they work. Sport pros and their leg sized lenses well that is another word. Parents of sporting children yes yes Pana is great. But for pensive, human feelings photos, Fuji has something very special. I had a friend a Canon user of course who told me he never takes pictures of people. I saw his pictures, like the famous old sneakers thrown on top of the power lines to swing. I'd like to have seen the person making the decision to throw and also the moment of action. Well that great Pana lens on an Oly would have compelling samples.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2017 at 03:33 UTC
On article Panasonic Leica DG 15mm F1.7 shooting experience (405 comments in total)

Typical poor Pana skin tones in the jpegs. Get a Fuji X70 instead. Make people look healthy.

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2017 at 13:12 UTC as 55th comment | 8 replies
On article Fujifilm X-A3 sample gallery (86 comments in total)
In reply to:

great Javier: The direct competitor for this fuji a3 is the sony a6000. Three years later, the sony a6000 is hard to beat.

Yeah Sony skin tones make people look blanched. Just no pink on the face, just like Casper the ghost. Fuji makes people look great. Now with Fuji I get requests for more jpegs and prints.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2017 at 04:24 UTC
In reply to:

straylightrun: Does the X100F update improve the slow autofocus speed?

I do not find the X100F slow at all.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2017 at 05:25 UTC
In reply to:

jbw28: Really enjoyed this article. As it is a constant struggle to find that nice, light "street style" camera you can carry around with you.

Ricoh GR problems:

horrible skin tones at high ISOs, mentioned in many reviews
horrible color jpegs, reds are oranges
horrible AF speed in low light
my GR puffed smoke but kept on going

I like the digital 28mm 35mm 47mm zoom

In my opinion better is the Nikon Coolpix A, Fuji X70

Link | Posted on May 16, 2017 at 02:49 UTC

With horrible skin tones from Panasonic, its weakest feature. Go Fuji, Nikon instead. Canon, Olympus

Link | Posted on May 11, 2017 at 18:00 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply

how to pause and save a certain moment please

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 22:00 UTC as 9th comment
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (377 comments in total)
In reply to:

mcshan: Compare a couple of hundred shots on Flickr of each camera and it is obvious the Ricoh is the better.

Skin tones of the GR make people look like zombies, grey, dull. Sick. Horrible skin tones. GR has plenty of jpeg color issues too.

Fuji skin tones are great. So are the Coolpix A from Nikon.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2017 at 14:53 UTC
On article Fujifilm X70 Review (377 comments in total)

The skin tones of the GR make people look grey, sick. Google GR samples.

The Fuji X70 skin tones make people look healthy, rosy.

Night and day.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2017 at 14:23 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm X100F Review (818 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: Ricoh GRIII will be the killer

GR is a loved camera, but the skin tones at high ISO are zombie grey. People look ill. In contrast, Fuji has excellent skin tones that make people look healthy. Night and day for people pictures.

Link | Posted on Mar 22, 2017 at 03:16 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T20 Review (375 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tieu Ngao: The X-T20 is a bargain considering that it's only $100 more than the X-T10, and $500 cheaper than the Sony a6500.
Nikon, where are you???

sony has skin tones that are too white, too blanched, words come from my son that has two serious Sony setups

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2017 at 20:56 UTC
On article Lumee Duo is an iPhone case with built-in illumination (22 comments in total)

More than doubles the thickness

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 04:15 UTC as 4th comment
On article Canon PowerShot G9 X II sample gallery (108 comments in total)

The G7Xii gives you so much more firepower than the 9 in so many ways. The 9 is a slow lens, which makes it really for outdoors only.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2017 at 04:30 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

The winner here is the Canon G7X. I had the Sony RX100, the II, the III, the IV, and the V. The sony pictures make people look so white, so blanched, they look boring. I bought a Canon G7X and wow! People look tanned, healthy. I am getting wows and requests for reprints, resends, people are commenting on my pictures with interest! One does not need an EVF for night social pictures. For day pictures, yes, but day light is satisfied with any camera. It is high ISO night or indoor pictures that require a special camera and that is the G7X. The G9X is too dark.

Also alternatives for indoor work are the amazing Fuji X70 with its angelic exquisite skin tones, the Nikon A with its perfect jpeg skin tones. The Ricoh GR and the Panasonics are great for buildings and landscapes, but not good for skin tones.

My favorites the Canon G7x and the Fuji X70.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 14:49 UTC as 25th comment | 6 replies
On article Canon debuts EOS M6 mirrorless with optional EVF (669 comments in total)

These slow lenses are priced as if they were faster

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 05:11 UTC as 128th comment | 4 replies
On article Feisty upstart: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T20 (357 comments in total)
In reply to:

villagranvicent: m43 is doomed.

M4/3 has very limited high ISO capabilities. At ISO 3000 the Fuji is fine, most m4/3 don't do great at 1200. You can use that to compensate, with the advantage of shooting moving subjects well without flash.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2017 at 02:54 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: Fujifilm X100 (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

zodiacfml: Nice film simulation modes. I hope they have something to compete against the Ricoh GR as a slim but APSC powerhouse.

yes the GR has a sharper lens. But the skin tones of people with the GR are horrible, ashen, sick looking. All reviews criticize GR jpegs, wrong colors. All reviews praise the Fuji X100. Look at google samples of high ISO from GR, yuck. For pictures of faces, the GR is inferior. Also at 28mm the X100 is better at 35mm.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 16:11 UTC
Total: 362, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »