ChrisJSLH

Found the post. He was using the Nauticam housing. https://www.nauticam.com/products/na-r5-housing-for-canon-eos-r5-camera Edit: just noticed the age of the OP. I guess this is old news...

Have a look on the Facebook Canon R5 groups. There have been a couple of people posting underwater shots using the R5 so there must be something available already. I'll see if I can find the posts...

Version 5 of of the ColorFidelity profiles are an excellent starting point for the R5. Worth the money.

If the GP-E2 (or 3rd party equivalent) is not an option for you then you have two main options. The first, Canon Camera Connect. For me, this works well with my Android phone. There is a short ...

Nice. Looking forward to trying them. The V4 profiles were a huge improvement over the previous versions so hopefully these will be better still.

Yes, perfectly normal. I guess the camera is never truly 'off'. Things like bluetooth persist when the camera is 'off' too.

DXO scores should never be a step in your workflow.

Mucking about with my new RF 15-35.

If you look at the Hahnel website they mention " *Plate for LP-E6NH available on request" https://www.hahnel.ie/irish-shop/procube2_canon/#tabs2 I sent them an email, got a response almost ...

Lovely! I have one on order. Can't wait to to shoot with it.

Actually, I've just looked at mine an it is marked as LPE6NH. I bought mine in October so maybe I already have it? How is yours marked?

Interesting, I've contacted them to see how to get one.

If you have any RF lenses definitely check the Canon website for updates. There were some recently (August) that fully enabled the IBIS and Lens IS to work together. My RF 24-70 & RF 24-105 both ...

Yes, I'm using one too although I haven't had the same experience as you. I don't take much notice of what the display says but the Pro Cube charges both my LP-E6NH to 100% without issue. I had ...

I think we are in agreement here. Always a good point to reach.

You started by saying there's no advantage at all and then went on to explain the primary advantage to me, namely size. Storage, on-site back-up and then off-site back-up. Money and time.

For me this is a much better comparison and aligns well with others I have read. While there is a difference in noise patterns, it is just that a difference. Not necessarily better or worse. You ...

Fair enough but we still don't know what the original exposure was like.

Some questions... We can see the shutter speed was 1/10000 (extremely fast), what was the aperture and did you have any exposure compensation dialled in? How heavily was the exposure pushed in post? ...

It is certainly my friend now. If Canon made a RAW to CRAW convertor available then I would happily compress 90% if my catalogue of images.