kolyy

If you are a Fuji user, then the X-E3 is actually smaller and lighter than any current M43 camera with an EVF. You can pair it with the 15-45mm or 18/2mm. If you want to go significantly smaller ...

How can a single shot take longer than a multi shot burst when the total exposure time is the same?

If you can afford stacking 16 images at high ISO, than you can also just drop the ISO 16x and use a 16x longer exposure time. That's photography 101. Given the time overhead needed for burst ...

It is not an ISO6400 shot. it 16 shots at ISO6400 stacked together. Stack 16 images with A9 and then compare. Or just shoot at ISO400 1/500s. The model then does not have to keep very still at ...

HHHR takes 16 images, which is 4 stops (2^4=16). So it's equivalent to a ISO400 1/500s shot. Of course, there is absolutely no reason why he couldn't just take an ISO400 shot and it would be ...

That's pretty bad and I haven't experienced anything like that with my 24-70/4. The MF result is intriguing - does the image appear to be sharp in magnified view in the EVF? One possibility could ...

I use the DNG Converter as well and it works fine for me. What you loose by default is lens profiles for new lenses and simulations for Sony's in-camera color profiles. Both can be solved by ...

I don't think the better margin ends in Tamron's pocket though...

Actually, the A7R II is smaller than the E-M1II and only marginally heavier (625g vs 574g) and not much more expensive ($1800 vs $1700). But Samyang does, the FE 24mm F2.8 AF. E-mount is an open ...

Wouldn't bracketing be problematic with all the water movement? I guess it is fair to say that this is the kind of shot where a larger and cleaner sensor would make the life of a photographer ...

What kind of ~200g M43 standard zoom are you talking about? There is no 12-40mm like that. There is the Panasonic 12-60mm/3.5-5.6 kit lens which would fit your description. Are you seriously ...

But APS-C sensors perform worse at the same ISO than FF ones, which is not an accident, but a consequence of capturing less light due to the smaller area.

Equivalent settings (DOF and noise):
FF:...

But they do it in the sensor plane, of course. It is easy to verify it, just turn the camera on without a lens and have a look.

IBIS can't do it, it only moves the sensor in the sensor plane (horizontally and vertically). The sensor is always parallel to the lens with the flange distance being constant.

4) it would be nice to have a tiny 50mm/2.8 on E-mount, but the Sony 50mm/1.8 is pretty small as well, it is as light as the Fuji 35mm lenses. And it is half the price of even the cheaper 35mm/2,...

Dr_I: Interesting. My take is a little different, with very different outcome, as some of the points you discuss led me to buy the A7 III:
1) True, there is no small and light ~20mm AF lens for...

Than a 28-70mm F3.5-5.6? No, it isn't. Wrong example, Richard.

It's not a huge difference, but I don't think dpreview should make such trivial errors in their database. They have exactly the same error for the weight of the new Panasonic FF cameras as well.

407g should be the weight without the battery. 450g with the battery and the SD card: https://shop.panasonic.com/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/lumix-interchangeable-lens-ilc-cameras/DC-GX9M.html#s ...

Yes, Fuji's F2 primes are a little bit larger than F1.8 primes on M43 (and half a stop faster in equivalent terms), but then the X-T30 is 70g lighter than the GX9. The overall package is very...