Andy Blanchard

I have an EF 11-24mm, and it's a perfect match of the top down profile, with the MF ring slightly raised from the main barrel to accomodate the large front element, and the clipped lens hood ...

Sure they should. The 1DXiii is aimed two user groups:

#1: Pros for whom the current limitations of mirrorless, small as they might be, are still significant enough to make a difference (mostly...

The text does say he couldn't interact with the R3 *on camera*, not that he couldn't touch it at all. Of course, it could be that there was a Canon rep there and they need to do (or veto) all the...

This is one of the two main reasons why I went with a 1DX3 rather than hold out for the R1 (or R3, maybe?).  There is still too much lag on EVFs for me, and not just Canon's as I've tried others ...

The two positions are not mutually exclusive.  Sure, Canon could have made a mirrorless with EF mount - it would have been a lot bigger than it needed to be, but it would be possible.  But then ...

It's pretty standard electronics industry practice to annouce end of support dates either with or shortly after announcing end of manufacturing dates.  It's also not like they are dropping support ...

It also says 1990 on the page I got those dates from (that's Wikipedia for you!), but the 1987 date does seem to be correct given it's also on other EF lens history pages elsewhere, so thanks for ...

And here.  I knew full well going in that my 1DXmk3 was likely to be the last of its kind (at least from Canon) and it was highly unlikely that EF lens manufacture was going to continue much ...

Very much so.  This isn't Canon's first rodeo here, so here's their previous timeline for comparison: (1) FD introduced: 1971 (2) EF introduced: 1990 (3) Last FD ...

Personally, I think there are enough usage cases where DSLRs still have a clear advantage over Mirrorless that this is perhaps a little premature (selective DoF in a hurry being a prime example ...

A BBC drone operator would automatically have fallen under commercial use, e.g. they were getting paid for the flight (even if as part of a salary), therefore it was a commercial operation. This...

Also, titanium is quite sensitive to scuffs and scratches, and as it naturally oxidizes over time smaller scratches will become more visible. Don't expect your shiny and expensive plate to remain...

AFAICT Lycan don't currently have any charger modules that support multiple batteries. That means that if you want to use a Volkit to charge multiple batteries of the same type without having to...

I *thought* the name was familiar. Ex-Microsoft, and co-founder of Intellectual Ventures (or should that be "Vultures"?) one of the big patent farms that makes money off litigation of patents they...

If you're using a long lens on a tripod with gimbal that isn't fully locked down then having a solid support nearer the far end of the lens does make a *slight* difference. If you're using a ...

Yep, the latest manual still makes it pretty clear (at the bottom of p521) that you can only have one Bluetooth device at a time on the camera, and the latest firmware doesn't appear to have ...

I (finally) updated to 1.2.1 firmware over the weekend having deferred it due to an imminent trip, which is partly what prompted this post. Yes, WiFi (or a wired network for the camera) can save ...

Echoing the crowd, but I'd also say the 16-35m f/4 (budget, more general use), TS-E 17mm (more interiors), and TS-E 24mm (more exteriors), should be on your shortlist.  Which one(s) to get will ...

That's also my impression from the way the camera UI works, hence my mention of workarounds as a potential "solution" in the OP in case I'm overlooking something that's more convenient than the ...

T6 is correct. It was released on 8th October according to the Canon download site, and the actual .FIR file in the download is dated 25th September. It does appear to have slipped below the radar ...