Tomasz_Wk

Well, if you want “new tech” the price will be much higher. Look at GFX100. That “old tech” is still holding it’s ground compared to more recent similarly priced cameras.

Haha

I wish that Voigtlander made lenses for Fujifilm.

I sold the 27mm for a 23mm f2 with no regrets. Lens is fast and has a silent autofocus motor.

X-H2 is going to be superior to X-t3 and has IBIS.

Wait for X-H2

No one really care about "accurate colour reproduction". Clients and photographers care more about how pleasing the colours look to the eye.

It’s not that different. Anyway, I even don’t use ISO12800 on my x-t2 so it’s not really a dealbreaker for me.

They don't need to go FF. The X-T3 shows that APS-C is still revelant.

I think that you are sooo wrong.

I like them. I think that the iso performance is a bit better bit better than the x-t2 but nothing revolutionary.

I have the 90/2 lens and it’s one of the sharpest lens I’ve ever seen.

Maybe in exchange the camera has more DR.

Dependent of You want alk The New video study. I’m happy with The x-t2. But I don’t do video.

I thought that BSI sensors give an advantage in Dynamic Range not ISO...

I think that the "edited to taste" pictures have been sharpened a bit too much, that's why the noise looks more visible.

If it has the same sensor as the 5D markIV, then it shows that in the future the next iteration will probably have the same sensor as the 5D markV (if there is any).

For me Fuji jpgs give the best colours. Even for 600$. I would love to have a Leica but I always was disapointed by the their colour science straight out of the camera.

I would love to have this great camera with 2 or 3 lenses for the fun and feel that a rangefinder provides. But unfortunatly it costs way too much. Why todays market doesn't provide us a range of...

Why not 3 card readers in the camera just in case !