Mike99999

Because you are a Nikon user, you are used to green skin tones. It would make sense that everything else looks orange or magenta to you. The human eye adapts & is very subjective with colors.

Hard pass.

Really looking forward to the Animal Eye AF, both for taking pictures of my cats and for more serious safari/wildlife photography. If this works well, it will be a very impressive upgrade.

Stunning for a zoom lens.

I'm a Sony shooter and not a fan of Canon, but the sample images in this post are 100x better than anything I've seen out of the Tamron FE 28-75mm f2.8...

16-35/4 + 85/1.8 Because mid-range zooms are boring.

I think the best way is: (1) gradually replace your APS-C lenses with FF lenses (2) once you are ready to upgrade, find a great deal on a FF body

What's the message of a dude taking pictures behind a fence?

"We make amateur cameras at professional prices"?

What happened, Olympus? You used to be cutting edge...

The Nikkor 50/1.8 G is garbage so there's half your answer.

You are looking for Voigtländer.

They have a small 35/1.2, 40/1.2 and 50/1.2.

What's wrong with Batis 25/2 and 24/1.4 GM?

For sure the Nikkor will be as heavy and pricy as it's 35 and 50mm counterparts.

25% of that roadmap are 50mm lenses. Nikon = Sony now?

I'm not sure if it is the wisest use of resources to develop 50/1.8 + 58/0.95 manual + 50/1.2 AF while omitting bread-and-butter lenses like...

Yep, indeed.

I upgraded my PEN E-P2 + 20/1.7 to an A7 + 35/2.8 and those seem the last gear where manufacturers had small size in mind. Always bigger and bigger these days.

"Sony's I've used in the past"

Anecdotal, and this would indicate that you haven't used an A9 or A7 III.

Not sure why you need so many primes just a few mm apart. Do you carry all of those around with you? IMHO, it is better to own few top quality primes and know them through and through. I'd thin ...

Owner of A7, A7 II, and A7 III here. IMHO, the A7 II's biggest shortcoming is the outdated sensor. It is the same old sensor as the A7, and while acceptable, performs even worse than Nikon's old ...

@TORN those previous Sony models are costing less than $1,000 currently.

The A7 II is $898.
The A7 (which matches the EOS R feature set) is currently $798.00.

Those bodies offer incredible value....

The reason to get a D500 is high-quality long glass, which is non-existent on Fuji.

True.

The Sony FE 28/2, Zeiss Loxia 35/2, and the Zeiss Batis 40/2 CF are quite a bit better than what is shown in this gallery, that's for sure.