Bender79ita

The autofocus is not comparable. The rest is. It's up to you if you want to pay for it ;)

My 18-135 is decently sharp, I don't notice the size being a dslr user mostly, but it has some issues with focusing small subjects at the telephoto end (I only use af-c), resulting in several ...

You don't sound like a new user, you could have looked up some reviews or samples and avoided the lens or the system entirely. Yes this kit lens is worse then the others. Yes many Sony lens are ...

I'm just saying the 16-50 does alot of things for the price and size, and you don't need the latest and greatest to start and grow your brand.

The choice is between iso performance / depth of field vs autofocus and new features really, because both batteries are kinda crappy. I went for a6400, but I already owned a ff camera. Otherwise i ...

Some glass is like what a Ducati Scrambler is for motorcycles, you will sell it easily because of high demand if you change your mind. With the A6100 coming I have no doubt i could sell all my ...

I hate this guy, he's making me spend a fortune in Sigma primes  :-D However, consider the 16-50 a cheap and lightweight alternative to; (1) 18-105 f4 (2) 18-135 f3.5-5.6 (3) 16-5 ...

Yes it can be removed, but you are getting kinda grey borders that somewhat decrease the overall image quality it seems to me. In example, f1.8 on the RX100III and f2 are a world of difference for ...

Laowa 9mm f2.8 is always on my mind, what can I say :-( More seriously, I probably had it at f2.8 (i rarely use the maximum aperture, usually the next avaible for better corners and less ca).

I would totally go for the 12mm Rokinon, it's sharp as hell, it's f2.8 and with A6000 it's likely that you want to MF anyways for max sharpness. I don't own it but my friend loaned to me for 2 ...

Step 1: identify crucial menu items Step 2: add to mymenu Step 3: remove the AF modes you don't use (I removed everything but flex L and flex L track) Step 4: set the custom buttons for what you ...

I'd rather buy a used D7200 with 70-300 for the same money, so no, i won't be buying it.

18-135 is also my favorite lens for general use. It's plenty sharp for small prints or web, and it's very small and lightweight compared to my dslr gear. That said i'd prefer the 16mm f1.4 as a ...

I have the RX100III and A6400. I'm waiting on the 20mm f2.8 pancake (I will never buy the 16-50). The size is not comparable. The RX100 is pocketable, the A6400 is not, but both will fit a bag. And ...

I don't have any ND filters for phone though, i have a RX100III but the included ND in the camera wasn't enough for cloud motion. Thank you! I ride since i was 14, i'm 40 now, weather is not that ...

It's the new processor i think, Sony APS-C had a similar noise, I noticed my A6400 having a similar pattern to my old D7500, even though the MP count is different. A6400 also got a strong processor ...

What's wrong is shooting action at F11-F22, or shooting at F22 in general. When you go smaller then F8-F9 quality will start to degrade. When you need to go smaller then F9 it's time to consider an ...

I have the 18-135, it's not bad at all for a superzoom. Honestly, I thought it would suck. Of course it's not sharp like a short range zoom (say 17-50 or latest 18-55 on a dslr), but it's not ...

Live hystogram and auto zoom in MF are just great practical tools to have in general; also in shooting video (yes some other cameras can) in daylight it comes very handy, also zhevra for stills is ...

In all cases when you shoot against light or have high contrast difference between two or more areas of the image. What all raw files excel at containing in their apparently ridicolous size, is ...