Lives in United States The Old Dominion, United States
Has a website at
Joined on Jun 16, 2002


Total: 150, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

"Hahahaha!" --- Sony.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 12:03 UTC as 38th comment | 2 replies

My goodness, why?

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 03:56 UTC as 54th comment

28mm vs. 24mm is a big difference. I find the 28-75 range very limited.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2018 at 14:19 UTC as 3rd comment | 3 replies

A fool and his virtual currency ...

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2018 at 14:41 UTC as 28th comment | 1 reply
On article Report: GoPro is looking for a buyer (160 comments in total)

If a buyer is not to be found, the company plans to change its name to GoUnder.

Link | Posted on Jan 9, 2018 at 16:37 UTC as 22nd comment | 6 replies

So DPReview is now a rumor site as well?

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2017 at 14:27 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Steven Lyons: Wow, who thought it was a good editorial decision to publish a review article using Puerto Rico as a location (regardless of when the photos were shot). Much of the island likely does not exist as it is being portrayed in the photos. Many lives were lost, people are still suffering with power and water in short supply and the natural environment has been forever altered. Stunningly tone deaf.

This is aother ridiculous comment. Just because a place was hit by a natural disaster doesn't mean we should erase it from all publications. If anything, this review and its samples show us how beautiful Puerto Rico was, and will still be. Besides, this is an equipment review article, can't we just treat it as is?

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2017 at 18:26 UTC

And this is photography news how?

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 02:52 UTC as 61st comment | 2 replies
On article Sony announces lightweight FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS lens (295 comments in total)

I hope this will be better than their 24-70 f/4 and 16-70 f/4 (for APS-C), which as I understand are subpar despite the Zeiss badge.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 13:59 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies

Just a funny thought: I have the Canon 7DII, if I get the A7RII, I will have R2-D2

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 12:57 UTC as 188th comment | 3 replies

This may mean that I will finally be able to afford the A7R II.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 12:56 UTC as 189th comment | 5 replies

Didn't they also want to ban these from carry-on?

They might as well just ban travel altogether.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2017 at 14:28 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply

An entry-level digicam will suffice.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2017 at 12:27 UTC as 19th comment
On article Looking back: Canon's eye-controlled focus (226 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: I want a camera that straps to my head and all I have to do to take a picture is look at it, and yell "SHOOT! SHOOT!" at the top of my lungs. Think of the great street photos we could get! Everything else should be taken care of.

I can picture you being confronted by armed security personnel while yelling "shoot! Shoot!".

Link | Posted on May 11, 2017 at 15:52 UTC
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (306 comments in total)

It looks like a soap box with bullet holes.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2017 at 10:46 UTC as 74th comment | 1 reply
On article Erez Marom: On causality in landscape photography (105 comments in total)

I think Karma is more important, but she can be ornery sometimes.

Link | Posted on Mar 19, 2017 at 13:05 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On article Nine tips to help you win at photography competitions (100 comments in total)

I looked at these pictures and can't help but think that the #1 rule is that the selections are very subjective and even arbitrary. Some of these pictures I consider to be mediocre and boring at best.

(It is not clear from the article if these are all winning photos or the author just wanted to use these to make a point, in particular #8 is really bad and the author seems to use it negatively to illustrate his point. If that's the case, then it is also bad writing for not making thins clear. Nonetheless he seems to use most of them positively.)

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2017 at 15:57 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply

I'll buy a selfie stick for the sole purpose of whacking theses annoying gizmos!

(No, I don't take selfies)

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2017 at 04:29 UTC as 26th comment
On article Sigma Announces 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM lens (154 comments in total)
In reply to:

alcaher: Interesting move by sigma. I think its going to sell quite well.
For those long hikes and walks on the mountains and woods i used the nikkor 70-300 but this new lens might get alot of attention because of that extra 100mm reach.

@chaos: where do you get a 1.3x TC? Is that a rhetorical statement? With TC you will lose IQ and aperture too.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2017 at 18:05 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (450 comments in total)

No AFMA, yikes, crippled!

Link | Posted on Feb 17, 2017 at 18:33 UTC as 17th comment | 6 replies
Total: 150, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »