ThatCamFan

MarioV are you saying that snapshot is worthy of posting? We in Iceland would not even bat an eye at that crap posted above, we see it dime a dozen.

Roland Karlsson the man has made MILLIONS of dollars from STEALING other peoples work, why would we not care?

If someone broke into your house stole all your stuff and sold it, would you be okay...

I hope he goes down in glory on fire & looses everything he owns. He has stolen enough already.

It is scientificly impossible to process an image to make it look like it is polorized, you can get the colors but all the glare and reflections can not be removed.

Yea this is why I will never buy a DJI as long as they restrict it despite you being hired to do a job and having all the permits they are technicly making you loose money which could be a lawsuit...

Why not just have Erez have the photo of the week every week with the same ten images you keep doing anyway?

Who is a russian troll? And why are you bringing discrimination into this?

5/10 by claiming i know the exact spot. perhaps if i had not tried to claim the exact spot i would of gotten 100%

software functions do not remove the reflection only a polorizer can do so.

Yes but I am surprised he did not put the screens quality on his list of what to check for. I picked my laptop when I had one because it had an IPS screen and great reviews for photo editing.

When it comes to copyright its a clear cut case & corporations tend to loose.

Good hope they pay every single penny.

What about the screen quality? that should be nr1. or has he not even considered that when buying?

Sorry im running with a mirrorless the battery never lasts long ill go change it.

I sense Slouch being an internet troll.

Non the less the owner of the camera should be the copyright holder in cases like this in my opinion. We need that put into laws everywhere.

PETA should kindly go F them selfs. They put down thousands of animals every year & claim to be animal lovers & protectors. We can only hope isis targets them next because my god they deserve it.

This is the crasiest and dumbest case I have ever known going on. Of course the photographer should own the image for freaks sake!

Beside the fact they are legally required to recall if its a manufacturing issue. Ignoring it would be illegal hence the class action lawsuit when the D600 defects showed up & nikon refused they...

I see what you did there >.> I have got oil, maybe i should of sprayed it into my D750 which I just sold & now feel bad for the person that bought it :p