nemark

nemark

Lives in Serbia Serbia
Joined on Jan 13, 2009

Comments

Total: 114, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article 2016 Roundup: Compact Enthusiast Zoom Cameras (286 comments in total)

"No built-in flash ...."

That is a trade of for a built-in EVF, and I even do not notice the luck of built-in flash.
Built-in flash or built-in EVF?
EVF, of course! EVF is somethig I use almost 100% of time, flash only 20-30%. For that level of usage, I can have it in my pocket. And bundled one is really small.
So, it is not a minus for me, but contrary.
And yes, zoom should go to 100mm, at least.
And artuculated LCD would be great, to.
And also a built-in ND filter.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2016 at 13:10 UTC as 69th comment
In reply to:

nemark: OK, why should I by 1.8/50mm over the Zeiss 1.8/55mm? Am I missing something?
But Sony is still missing a good UWA FE prime (not a brick like Sigma ART lenses, but normally sized AND good one)...

Obviously, I missed a lot :(

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 20:12 UTC

OK, why should I by 1.8/50mm over the Zeiss 1.8/55mm? Am I missing something?
But Sony is still missing a good UWA FE prime (not a brick like Sigma ART lenses, but normally sized AND good one)...

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 20:28 UTC as 42nd comment | 6 replies
On challenge Black & White Photo of the Week #4 (2 comments in total)

Do images MUST be black and white, or monochromatic (sepia etc.) is also OK?

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2015 at 13:17 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On article ZEISS goes wide with Loxia 21mm F2.8 for Sony E-mount (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wedding photographer: Comparison with VM 21 mm / F 1,8 Ultron will be interesting.

No fair comparison. 1.8 and 2.8 are two different leagues. It would be great if 1.8 is the same or better quality (from 2.8 onwards) than 2.8, but...

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2015 at 19:10 UTC
On article Meet Milvus: Hands-on with Zeiss's Milvus lenses (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris Yates: Yikes!!! The more I look at these the more I prefer the look and handling of the classic ZF and ZE lenses. The 21mm, 100mm and 85mm are not particularly attractive. Besides there's nothing more satisfying than cold hard metal touching your fingertips.

All lenses but 1.4/50 and 1.4/85mm have the same number of elements/groups as ZF and ZE Zeisses. Should that mean that they are just redesigned? And yes, I also don`t like the look and handling of new birds of prey by Zeiss.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2015 at 15:06 UTC
In reply to:

codeNsnap: Super ! Thanks Tamron. Finally a compact 35mm with VR/VC for us Nikon shooters. Will be my second Tamron prime after my 90mm VC Macro which has been stellar for macros and portraits.

As I already wrote, EOS pancakes are great (at least on APS-C, what I am using). People say that EOS 1.8/50mm is also great. I was eager to see Samyang 2.8/10mm, an when I saw some sample photos, I was disappointed. It is not compact (some 10-xx mm zooms are smaler - OK, not 2.8, but are zooms), it doesn't take filters (10-xx mm zooms do), and I wasn't pleased with test images - 10-xx zooms seam better or at least as good as Sam. And so on...

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2015 at 05:56 UTC
In reply to:

codeNsnap: Super ! Thanks Tamron. Finally a compact 35mm with VR/VC for us Nikon shooters. Will be my second Tamron prime after my 90mm VC Macro which has been stellar for macros and portraits.

Compact? These are HUGE lenses for what they are... Can somebody make a compact AND quality prime anymore??? (Sorry Canon, your pancakes and few more are.) And yes, I am not a FF shooter...

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2015 at 18:03 UTC
In reply to:

electrophoto: About the ND100'000:
Cheap alternative: Welding Shield (Grade 13 solid).... works well and costs only a few quid.
might not be the same optical quality (quite certainly not) but if you're looking for a cheap option, easily affordable... that's a good thing.

If you decide to try Baader, the trick with AstroSolar and Mylar sheets is to mount them on the lens/scope lose, not tightly stretched...
HTH

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2015 at 15:42 UTC
In reply to:

Digitalis32: The question is are they colour neutral?

What about custom white balance?

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 20:38 UTC
In reply to:

RichRMA: No idea if an ND is that safe (or good quality enough) for solar shooting. Consider using Baader Solar Film or glass filters from Thousand Oaks Optical. Both are metallized to screen out UV and IR.

ND filters of proper density are as safe as Baader or Thousand Oaks, because you don`t use them for gazing into the Sun, just to frame it and focus. I use AstroSolar ND3.8 for imaging and ND5.0 for watching sunspots as they are much cheaper and I can cover large apertures for just a few bucks. Nota Bene: these are logarithmic values, not linear as in photographic filters.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 20:34 UTC
In reply to:

electrophoto: About the ND100'000:
Cheap alternative: Welding Shield (Grade 13 solid).... works well and costs only a few quid.
might not be the same optical quality (quite certainly not) but if you're looking for a cheap option, easily affordable... that's a good thing.

I used welding glass for solar imaging some ten years ago, but I was not satisfied with image quality. I don`t know if glass surfaces were not plane enough, or they were not plan parallel, or both, or something else. Now for solar imaging I use Baader Astrosolar Safety Film that is also cheap alternative. It costs some 25€ for a 20x30 cm sheet, and you can cut it into several sizes for all your needs.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 20:29 UTC
On article CP+ 2015: Fujifilm shows prototype roadmap lenses (78 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: I wonder if Nikon and Canon are paying attention?

They are listening only what top pros have to say. They are not interested in vox populy, but there is the market... And it is the key to Fuji`s success.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 20:33 UTC

SONY FF E cameras now need a quality prime in a 18-20mm range... But not as heavy and bulky as 1.4/35mm is. F 2.8 or even 3.5 should be enough for me.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 20:31 UTC as 32nd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

sbansban: For me the biggest thing that could make or break this camera would be how fast this lens is (and of course, the quality of the lens - sharpness being my most important criterion aside from the other usual suspects like distortion, CA and so on). As many have speculated, if it's F2.8-F5.6, it's not very promising. But despite the lack of an EVF, given it's 1" sensor and relatively compact size, G3X would still have its niche, especially if the price is right.

Almost every camera has it`s niche, but is it`s niche large as it is aimed to?

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 19:44 UTC
In reply to:

Mike FL: OK, this Canon G3X has no build in EVF for sure.

I like to know if Canon G3X-MK2 will have a pop-up EVF as seem from SONY RX100-MK3.

Or we will waiting for G3X-MK3?

We can wait...

MkII will lose it`s option for external EVF, MkIII will have shorter lens, and if there is an MkIV, it will be even more striped. That is the Canon way...

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 19:33 UTC

They`ll need to put an EVF in a MkIV body, make compact and good 10mm WA, 40mm Macro, 65mm, and some other primes if they want to convince me about their "serious intentions".

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 20:40 UTC as 159th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Rod McD: A 1" sensor, an add-on EVF and a super-zoom??? This is a different line of camera from the G1X's. I'm still using the original 1.5" sensor G1X with its crappy OVF, slow between shot times and great IQ (at modest ISOs). I'll upgrade it one of these years with a suitable replacement. ATM, the LX100 would be leading the race. However, a BUILT-IN high grade EVF is an absolute requirement. I simply don't want an expensive, external, add-on EVF that blocks the flash shoe in use and gets left at home, lost or whatever. An egregiously bad idea. Please give us a complete camera.

If it is a necessary trade of to save size (and price), than built-in EVF and no built-in flash. EVF would be used most of the time, not the flash.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2015 at 09:35 UTC
In reply to:

LiSkynden: Looking at that one pic it looks like it has a "selfie" LCD YAY!!!

Great for selfies at 600mm!!! ;)
But there is tiltable LCD, I am quite positive.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2015 at 09:26 UTC
In reply to:

mcshan: I am not a superzoom guy. I would take the G1X I and II over this any day. I know this is a different series and would guess research shows there is a target audience.

I would like them too, but if there is a built-in EVF... Dream cameras IF evf.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2015 at 09:25 UTC
Total: 114, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »