nemark

nemark

Lives in Serbia Serbia
Joined on Jan 13, 2009

Comments

Total: 129, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article What you need to know: Canon G1 X Mark III (405 comments in total)
In reply to:

nemark: Definitely this is not an evolution (nor a revolution). Each mark is actually completely new camera, so why marjings (MkI, MkII, MkIII)????
And each next I like less. Actually, MkIII I don`t like at all!

You got the point... Except that MkI lacked correctly integrated EVF, IMHO (I wear eyeglasses, so it helps).

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 16:29 UTC
On article Have it your way: which 24MP Canon should I buy? (155 comments in total)

For me, all are options except G1 MkIII... Even M5/M6, in spite of their lens disabled system.

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 16:27 UTC as 19th comment
On article What you need to know: Canon G1 X Mark III (405 comments in total)

Definitely this is not an evolution (nor a revolution). Each mark is actually completely new camera, so why marjings (MkI, MkII, MkIII)????
And each next I like less. Actually, MkIII I don`t like at all!

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 15:15 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On article Gudsen Moza Air gimbal review (53 comments in total)

In a "Brisk Walking Test" video non stabilized recordings are much faster walked than stabilized, especially with Moza, so not fair comparison. Stabilization does not explan this, IMO.

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2017 at 17:49 UTC as 7th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon D3: The camera that changed everything (287 comments in total)

"3. If the D3 had come loaded with 'Snake II' it would have been perfect. Actually, given the amount of time professional photographers spend just waiting around, I've always wondered why simple arcade games weren't pre-loaded on professional DSLRs. "
Nice idea, but smartphones have it all. And most photographers do have at lest one. (I am not one of them - my Nokia is only a phone with some ad-ons, nor am I a fan of games :))

Link | Posted on May 27, 2017 at 17:05 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

panther fan: The Sony/Zeiss 35mm F2.8 is missing. Also missing is the Panasonic 15mm F1.7.

I think these are by far the best options. For a compact system with high IQ.

No way that Sony/Zeiss 2.8/35mm and Panasonic/Leica 1.7/15mm are pancake lenses, nor are Sigma 2.8/19mm or Olympus 1.8/17mm. Maybe they all are great lenses, but not pancake. They are not pocketable even without camera bodies (OK, maybe Oly 17mm, but ONLY without a camera).
It`s not a prime, but what about Panasonic Lumix G Vario HD 12-32mm F3.5-5.6? More pancakeish than Leica 1.7/15mm. Ok, a bit slower, but...

Link | Posted on May 15, 2017 at 17:43 UTC
In reply to:

Digimat: The M6 with an inbuild EVF please...

I also dislike M5`s DSLR type of EVF. Rangefinder, please...

Link | Posted on May 15, 2017 at 17:35 UTC
On article Ask the staff: electronic or optical viewfinder? (890 comments in total)

I haven`t tried any of now days EVFs, but got in love with them in the past while using Oly C740. I liked live histogram and to view results without removing my eye from finder - making me ready to repeat shot without losing composition. But I understand, from my experience and readings, that OVF is still in great advantage when it comes to low light shooting, and it is not only few times a year for me.
But I am deeply convinced that it would be possible to make hybrid reflex type OVF combined with electronic overlay like in Fuji hybrid VF... It would not bring us a smaller bodies like mirrorless, but will combine the best of two worlds in a DSLR body size.
Hope to see one in the near future.

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2017 at 19:56 UTC as 253rd comment
In reply to:

sirhawkeye64: Finally a super wide angle under 14mm for NIkon FF (that's not a fisheye).

...Or huge!

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2017 at 18:52 UTC
In reply to:

ninja250: Premium compacts never made much sense to me. At $650-$1000 a buyer can get a mirrorless camera with a much larger APS-C sized sensor, interchangeable lenses for the same price and at about the same size and weight. A Fuji X-T20 ($900), Canon M6 ($750), or Canon M3 ($480) would be a great choice compared to:

DL18-50 $850
DL24-500 $1000
DL24-85 $650

" the company's concern that it wouldn't sell enough units to make up for the increased costs, due to a slow down in the market." A valid concern. The compact market has gone from 40+ Coolpix models in 2015 to twelve today. Even 12 seems too many. When my friend asked me what camera to get his son and daughter, my response was "your old iPhone or an iPod touch. If they want more camera after using either the iPhone or iPod touch let me know."

Nikon, please focus on an APS-C and FF mirrorless camera and lens line. Your DSLR line is solid, so focus on Mirrorless please.

Premium compact might be senseless, especially when it comes to price, but they are compact. Compact premiums. And I like to have one in my pocket. Or hanging from my shoulder, if it is bigger version such as Sony RX10 MkIII.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2017 at 20:46 UTC

Pity for DL series. Expensive, but here were some really good conceptual ideas.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2017 at 20:39 UTC as 171st comment

Why don`t they sell it as a body only, or bundle it with 2.8/27mm lens? More bodies to be sold that way. Why should I need another 16-50mm lens?

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2017 at 00:48 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

nemark: Complete Fuji system looks like tailored for me (OK, I can satisfy almost 80-90% of my needs there - cameras, lenses...). But I have some complaints, too. It`s a pity that serious cameras like X-100 series are not weather sealed. Not to use them while it rains, but to protect them from internal condensation when I step inside a humid room from chill outside... And to be ready to make some photos inside without waiting camera to warm up inside my bag/pocket. And there should be an 10-12mm compact and quality prime for X series of cameras. Not necessarily F2. F2.8 or even 3.5 would be enough for me, if justified by quality and compactness...

Thank you, that is a good trick, but sometimes I want to take pictures just 5-10 minutes after coming in, very short time for camera to warm-up. I should try to shoot through the plastic bag. Thank you for idea.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 19:56 UTC

Complete Fuji system looks like tailored for me (OK, I can satisfy almost 80-90% of my needs there - cameras, lenses...). But I have some complaints, too. It`s a pity that serious cameras like X-100 series are not weather sealed. Not to use them while it rains, but to protect them from internal condensation when I step inside a humid room from chill outside... And to be ready to make some photos inside without waiting camera to warm up inside my bag/pocket. And there should be an 10-12mm compact and quality prime for X series of cameras. Not necessarily F2. F2.8 or even 3.5 would be enough for me, if justified by quality and compactness...

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2017 at 21:20 UTC as 20th comment | 3 replies
On article Feisty upstart: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X-T20 (357 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gediminas 8: Anyone can compare the size of the X-T20 to the X-E1? Don't think camerasize.com would have it in their database yet, and it looks tiny in those hands...

I haven't handled an X-T10 and I don't know if they are identical either.

But yes, they HAVE it in their database, and it seams that, beside the thickness, other dimensions are quite identical.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2017 at 10:52 UTC
On article 2017 Roundup: Compact Enthusiast Zoom Cameras (505 comments in total)

"No built-in flash ...."

That is a trade of for a built-in EVF, and I even do not notice the luck of built-in flash.
Built-in flash or built-in EVF?
EVF, of course! EVF is somethig I use almost 100% of time, flash only 20-30%. For that level of usage, I can have it in my pocket. And bundled one is really small.
So, it is not a minus for me, but contrary.
And yes, zoom should go to 100mm, at least.
And artuculated LCD would be great, to.
And also a built-in ND filter.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2016 at 13:10 UTC as 155th comment
In reply to:

nemark: OK, why should I by 1.8/50mm over the Zeiss 1.8/55mm? Am I missing something?
But Sony is still missing a good UWA FE prime (not a brick like Sigma ART lenses, but normally sized AND good one)...

Obviously, I missed a lot :(

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 20:12 UTC

OK, why should I by 1.8/50mm over the Zeiss 1.8/55mm? Am I missing something?
But Sony is still missing a good UWA FE prime (not a brick like Sigma ART lenses, but normally sized AND good one)...

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2016 at 20:28 UTC as 42nd comment | 6 replies
On challenge Black & White Photo of the Week #4 (2 comments in total)

Do images MUST be black and white, or monochromatic (sepia etc.) is also OK?

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2015 at 13:17 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On article ZEISS goes wide with Loxia 21mm F2.8 for Sony E-mount (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wedding photographer: Comparison with VM 21 mm / F 1,8 Ultron will be interesting.

No fair comparison. 1.8 and 2.8 are two different leagues. It would be great if 1.8 is the same or better quality (from 2.8 onwards) than 2.8, but...

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2015 at 19:10 UTC
Total: 129, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »