Purplegreen

Minimum focusing distance is shorter with the Tamron than the Sony, especially on the wider end. See here at 8:57 (video is in German). That gives near-macro results and fantastic bokeh and subject ...

This video has the clearest exemple so far of how soft this lens is at 70 mm, which is the only weakness that this lens shows. I don't think it's a deal-breaker. It could be if the Sony G master ...

Where did you see that pre-order price?

Why not the A6400? You’ll have IBIS with the Tamron.

I totally agree. Winter-time indoor shooting requires f1.4 - f1.8 prime lenses in my opinion. I was planning to buy the Sony 16-55 for next summer but the new Tammy 17-70 is a nice addition. And ...

Yes, the light was good but the framing of the shot is pure art. And it doesn’t matter if you were just “lucky”.

You are right. But arguably even the "natural" bokeh of a FF 1.4 lens is fake. It's the result of a man-made contraption and not like the human eye would see :) Your third picture (Albufeira) is ...

Congrats on your choice. IMHO it makes more sense to buy an A6400. Use the extra cash for a better lens. For those who rave about better depth of field and subject separation with FF cameras, let ...

Yes, I agree. I had a RX100-2 for a while as a backup camera and was blown away by the picture quality. Now I can only afford to have only one camera and before switching to the A6400 I did ...

Albeit complicated, it is possible to add GPS data to your pictures. If the A6400 had IBIS and GPS activated all the time I would guess that the battery would drain very quickly. Are you going to ...

Since my daughter (now 3 yrs old) started moving a lot, I became aware of how badly the autofocus in my A6500 was struggling to keep up with a wild and uncooperative fast-moving subject. And ...

I may sound old-fashioned but the lack of custom buttons is a deal-breaker.
Is this a point-and-shoot camera?

Is it just me or the X100V shows more CA in the first picture?