burnymeister

That would be awesome. And doable with a FW update.

With the emphasis on size and weight being so remarkable I went to the lens comparison chart and compared to equivalent lenses from other manufacturers. They may be fairly light and small but they...

Due to a major delay in my M10, I cancelled my order and got a Leica SL instead. It was far cheaper (2nd hand) and on hindsight a far better choice for me. I'm going to be using it with R lenses ...

If you think PP is cheating than you'd better not take JPEG's and better never convert any RAW files to JPEG either (have fun trying to enter those contests you love so much). Anything that touches ...

AFAIK, the Leica M9 will not work for astrophotography since it probably won't go more than something like 8 sec exposure on ISO 1600 or something like that. The M240, which is much newer was very ...

Glad ur happy. I would be too, if only I had the camera. Ordered it within 5 minutes of the announcement and was told by my local camera shop that I'll be lucky to get it this YEAR. No thanks. ...

I've been to that exact spot years ago. Brings back great memories, especially as we're still stuck in the midst of a cold / long winter here in Canada. Thanks for sharing!

True, but also not. :) If you read above, the T&D feature apparently doesn't work on the M6, which IMHO is a pretty big deal. Touch focus is VERY handy, especially for off-center subjects like ...

That's very interesting. As someone who's also been researching the two cameras, I've come to the conclusion that the M6 isn't really an upgrade to the M5, but rather a different revolution of the ...

Why not go with something like a Canon 50 f/1.4 or f/1.8 with the adapter for low light work? Seems like that would be a much better choice?

No kidding. I own an A7RII and used an A7S for astro which is much more capable. As a landscape camera, the Leica M series is very desirable with very good lenses that are also tiny and light....

Please tell me it can do a more than an 8 second long exposure at high ISO?! Please? I need this for astrophotography.

Drool. Now my keyboard barely works.

50 pics a day isn't much. As long as you power the camera off between shots. I usually take closer to 200-300. Are you sure this is all you take? It also depends how much chimping you do ...

This shows just how many stupid business ideas exist for every good one... This not being a good one. :P

Agreed - except for me it's the opposite. I use the 21mm Loxia simply because it's physically smaller than the 16-35mm which makes it easier to hike with. It's also a stop faster for astrophotography.

Makes my A7SII purchase at just over $2k seem almost cheap and that camera takes photos and videos in the dark. Literally.

I loved shooting with the Pen-F this past summer but Olympus and other...

Way too many CAPITALized words. Did Olympus pay for that trip?