Murat Sahan

Joined on Nov 10, 2012

Comments

Total: 66, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Jaekae: Phones take images that look good on phones, nowhere else

Really? Well I am reading this on my big 42 inch screen and the pics looks great.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2018 at 21:36 UTC

I feel a sudden desire to go out and shoot!

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2018 at 13:48 UTC as 26th comment
On a photo in the Pixel 2 sample gallery sample gallery (2 comments in total)

Very nice lowlight pics. Im impressed

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2018 at 16:47 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

soundimageplusblog: What amazes me is that in neither image has anybody bothered to get rid of the ugly plane trail in the top left hand corner. First thing I would have done.

Other thing to mention is if you are making a living from your photography, don't post images on the internet that are good enough quality to be stolen or used without permission. Or if you do don't complain about it. Sure Canon are thieving weasels in this case, but surely it's up to us as photographers to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen to our work.

You must be totally unable to see tings from other peoples perspective proven by your total lack of understanding for what this is about.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2018 at 19:06 UTC
In reply to:

so-what-17: Not bashing Sony, they've come a long way. but i did buy the a6000 when it first came out but the pictures looked over saturated and pastel'ish, so took it back. so used to the canon colors i guess and being slightly color blind and that fact that hdr'ish looking pictures is not what i want... the a9 has so many nice things about it just wish it had a option for a canon senor...so i figured that all of you Sony shooter or Sony sensors shooters have to under expose your picture and bring them up in photo shop to make them look OK thats the dynamic range you brag about not getting noise when you bring up the exposure at low iso. so at least with canon i can just shoot with the camera and have perfect pictures(as long as the iso is low canon has that problem when you crank the iso up of noise) without spending to much time with photo shop. and i would buy this camera in a heart beat but its the hdr'sh colors i don't like...

"Not much time needed" for PP is still boring and 2 much. Personally I like to shoot, NO PP unless really really needed.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 17:43 UTC
In reply to:

so-what-17: Not bashing Sony, they've come a long way. but i did buy the a6000 when it first came out but the pictures looked over saturated and pastel'ish, so took it back. so used to the canon colors i guess and being slightly color blind and that fact that hdr'ish looking pictures is not what i want... the a9 has so many nice things about it just wish it had a option for a canon senor...so i figured that all of you Sony shooter or Sony sensors shooters have to under expose your picture and bring them up in photo shop to make them look OK thats the dynamic range you brag about not getting noise when you bring up the exposure at low iso. so at least with canon i can just shoot with the camera and have perfect pictures(as long as the iso is low canon has that problem when you crank the iso up of noise) without spending to much time with photo shop. and i would buy this camera in a heart beat but its the hdr'sh colors i don't like...

Well as an ex nikon and olympus shooter I understand where you are comming from. I always loved the olympus colors and I like to just shoot, not keen on post work.

Link | Posted on Jan 12, 2018 at 10:30 UTC
In reply to:

veroman: dpreview: you're asleep at the wheel! Is anybody proofreading this stuff? The numbers of typos and grammatical errors is astonishing ... not to mention annoying. How do you expect to be taken as serious photography-subject journalists when you post like this? There's no excuse. Good journalism it ain't!

Your hars childish comments say more about you then they do about DPR.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2018 at 19:07 UTC
On article Nikon D850 Review (2101 comments in total)
In reply to:

Prognathous: DPReview: Did you ask Nikon why the camera needs extra hardware to reach 9 FPS? Could it be that technically the camera is capable of doing it as-is, but it's artificially capped to get people to pay more? I'm not aware of other cameras (including those that offer higher framerate) that has a similar limitation.

Nikon D300 and D300s for instance.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2017 at 18:25 UTC
On article Nikon D3: The camera that changed everything (293 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peak freak: Interesting read, although I would be inclined to suggest 'game changer' for professional photographers, which leads me to...
The original EOS 5D was the first FF camera that an enthusiast could realistically afford, and 2 years before the D3! That was a game changer for the masses.

The 5D was not for pros for sports or journalism, its AF and modest speed makes it good for landscape and enthusiasts.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2017 at 14:10 UTC
On article Nikon D3: The camera that changed everything (293 comments in total)
In reply to:

nemark: "3. If the D3 had come loaded with 'Snake II' it would have been perfect. Actually, given the amount of time professional photographers spend just waiting around, I've always wondered why simple arcade games weren't pre-loaded on professional DSLRs. "
Nice idea, but smartphones have it all. And most photographers do have at lest one. (I am not one of them - my Nokia is only a phone with some ad-ons, nor am I a fan of games :))

I think he was refering to the pre smartphoneexplosion-era!

Link | Posted on May 28, 2017 at 14:09 UTC
On article Updated: Sony a9 samples with Raw support (447 comments in total)
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: Back to Rockwells criticism of Sony for their underwhelming color reproduction.

And so back to the main thing, namely the colors of Sony cameras. He (rightly?) points out that colors are inferiour to Canikon.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2017 at 12:44 UTC
On article Updated: Sony a9 samples with Raw support (447 comments in total)

Back to Rockwells criticism of Sony for their underwhelming color reproduction.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2017 at 10:21 UTC as 89th comment | 23 replies

There is a sigma 8-12 for Dx for us amateours that could give us similar benefits for a much reduced cost. And thanks for a wonderful rewiev.

Link | Posted on May 6, 2017 at 12:37 UTC as 85th comment | 2 replies
On article Throwback Thursday: Minolta DiMAGE X (134 comments in total)

The Dimage Xg was my first digital camera. It could even film in vga (I think) very small and allways with me. Captured som invaluable moments thanks to it. Thanks to smartphones now obsolete but im always grateful for the moments I have saved thanks to it.

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2017 at 17:52 UTC as 19th comment
On article Light's L16 camera is in final stages of testing (306 comments in total)
In reply to:

fullstop: There is talk that some interational preorders are being cancelled

@fullstop, wow some people are never satisfied. And no they are doing the right thing by paying back people their money when the projekt didnt go as thought. They are NOT a bank and has made NO PROMISES of giving any interest.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 09:45 UTC

@DPR STAFF: I think there is a misstake in the specs for the 8+, isnt the battery in the 8+ 3500mAh?

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2017 at 13:53 UTC as 6th comment
On article Throwback Thursday: Our first cameras (394 comments in total)

To staff: I like the throwbacks, especially this one, but it would be even more fun if you had supplied some pictures you took with them back then. :)

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2017 at 21:53 UTC as 155th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

AlanG: Smithsonian gets 48,000 images to use as they like... even on products they sell. Plus they can market and license the photos to any others as they see fit.

"You retain your rights to your photograph; however, by entering the contest, you grant the Smithsonian Institution (and those authorized by the Smithsonian) a royalty-free, world-wide, perpetual, non-exclusive license to publicly display, distribute, reproduce and create derivative works of the entries, in whole or in part, in any media now existing or later developed, for any Smithsonian Institution purpose, including, but not limited to, advertising and promotion of the magazine and its website, exhibition, and commercial products, including but not limited to Smithsonian Institution publications. Any photograph reproduced will include a photographer credit as feasible. The Smithsonian Institution will not be required to pay any additional consideration or seek any additional approval in connection with such uses."

Yes, its a partnership.

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2017 at 23:58 UTC
On article OPPO 5x smartphone zoom system sample images (49 comments in total)

Just an idea to DP-staff, when you test something like this in the future, please take some sample pics with another phone or camera for compareson. Ideally would be one or two samples with another phone and a camera.

Apart from that I must say Im excited about this and I think that the pictures look good (albeit under ideal lightning but none the less.)

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2017 at 09:37 UTC as 16th comment
On article F is for '4th': Hands-on with Fujifilm X100F (424 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Lots of comments but none referring to the short focal length as a disadvantage. Personally, I'd be sorely tempted if it had a more normal focal length (30-34mm) as that would be genuinely useful for general purpose photography. The field of view of this 23mm lens is too wide for most things, yet too narrow if I want to go wide.

As far as I can see, only Sigma make a large-sensor compact with a standard lens but that has other limitations! I know you could get a PenF + 25/1.8 combo or an XE2 + 35mm lens but they aren't so tiny.

I understand Fuji would have done their market research and I am clearly in a minority here but I am curious if anyone else agrees?

23 X 1.5 = 35 mm focal.....

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2017 at 20:08 UTC
Total: 66, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »