Murat Sahan

Joined on Nov 10, 2012

Comments

Total: 91, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

adengappasami: Head Phone Jack, Expandable storage..say no more

There is an adapter so I can charge and listen at the same time. I can buy more dongels in case I need one. Currently I am not using a dongle.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2018 at 22:43 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

breschdlingsgsaelz: While I didn't expect anything other than a product that doesn't live up to its spec sheet from Samsung (been fooled by specs before and dumped the Samsung phone 2 months later) I am surprised that it fares so bad. I want to add I am surprised that it still gets a "85% score" on DPR when it seems to be a complete failure.

The pictures look plain horrible, I cannot understand how everybody and their dog (including DPR staff) tout smartphones as a viable replacement for P&S cameras. Either this phones camera is exceptionally bad or the talk about smart phone cameras being "good enough already" is pure rubbish.

entoman, your POV is for you not for me. I think my smartphone does a great job and get me the pictures I want, may it be selfies or may it be other kind of pictures. Nowadays I NEVER carrie a camera with me unless its for professional work. I was very pleasedwith my Samsung S6edge+ and even more so with my P20 Pro. The quality is acceptable for me, and guess what, for millions of others, and thats for many more purposes than taking a need picture in a special instance.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2018 at 22:08 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

adengappasami: Head Phone Jack, Expandable storage..say no more

Honestly i thought so too but after getting the P20 Pro Iam not so sure anymore. So far using the included headphones are goodenough for me.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2018 at 21:59 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: I tried the S9+ for a while. I have had samsung for the last 3 years and was very pleased with the S6 edge+. Somehow the s9+ didnt manage to capture (pun intended) my imagination - also here in Europe we unfortunately have the s9+ with the lacking Exynos 9810 chipset.

So changed to the Huawei P20 Pro and it surely delivers in the camera department. I hope the DPR staff will review it.

I have a suggestion for you. Why dont you go to the nearest store and try the cameras for yourself? I Dont see the smearing that they post in my pics (I only have a full HD 42" LCD) and I really dont look into the detail that much. But yes I sometimes do have the pictures printed out and to me they mostly look good. Now, in all honesty I havent shoot that much with the P20 Pro yet but the pics I did shoot look good to me.
Especially a couple taken in sunset from a moving boat.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2018 at 18:57 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chayagrahak: With all the research, Samsung galaxy S9+ failed on 3 areas in camera photography:
1. Pixel 2 xl which was released last year, takes amazing photos in portrait mode. Samsung could have learnt something from them, but the portrait mode in S9+ sucks. Just to check the camera I bought Pixel 2 xl (for cheap) and I can guarantee no other smartphone camera can beat in terms of camera. Also, extra sharpening in S9+ should not have been default (you could change in editing software)

2. Front facing camera. Compared to all other phones, Galaxy S9+ has a decent front facing camera. But if you ever tried Pixel 2 XL front facing camera, you hate the selfies from S9+. Again, Samsung could have learnt from Pixel.

3. HDR+ : Whatever GS9+ offering in HDR is very basic, but Pixel 2 XL HDR+ can make wonders.

That said, sadly I will be selling Pixel 2 xl, because I like GS9+ design and theme ability..folders.. so on. Once used to Galaxy can't be happy with other phone (except camera area).

"2. Samsung Experience launcher - This is the best launcher in any smartphone.. period" Ehh no? That is your personal taste, its like claiming chocolate is better than vanilla, period. Dont confuse opinion with facts please.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2018 at 05:20 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: I tried the S9+ for a while. I have had samsung for the last 3 years and was very pleased with the S6 edge+. Somehow the s9+ didnt manage to capture (pun intended) my imagination - also here in Europe we unfortunately have the s9+ with the lacking Exynos 9810 chipset.

So changed to the Huawei P20 Pro and it surely delivers in the camera department. I hope the DPR staff will review it.

You can shoot in 40 MP or 10 MP in promode and without the dreeded "AI". I have compared the pictures to my S6edge+ and the P20 Pro have more dynamic range.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2018 at 17:49 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

adengappasami: Head Phone Jack, Expandable storage..say no more

Yes my old SIII does have those features ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2018 at 10:10 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kona Mike: Does it warn idiots when they shoot video in portrait mode?

Some phones can remedy that ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2018 at 10:04 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Review (181 comments in total)

I tried the S9+ for a while. I have had samsung for the last 3 years and was very pleased with the S6 edge+. Somehow the s9+ didnt manage to capture (pun intended) my imagination - also here in Europe we unfortunately have the s9+ with the lacking Exynos 9810 chipset.

So changed to the Huawei P20 Pro and it surely delivers in the camera department. I hope the DPR staff will review it.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2018 at 09:58 UTC as 19th comment | 9 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Hands-on Preview (206 comments in total)

@DPR STAFF What happened with the review?

Link | Posted on May 4, 2018 at 09:07 UTC as 1st comment
On article Samsung Galaxy S9+ sample gallery (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

steviewa: It's just a shame about the rest of the phone, ie screen, audio quality, menu system and reliability

@steviewa
There ís NO Samsung 7+ but there is an Apple 7+ ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2018 at 17:17 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9+ sample gallery (76 comments in total)

Seems ok up to ISO 400 - but I did return my galaxy S9+ and going for the P20 Pro.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2018 at 17:15 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies

I checked it out on the Sony website it was 236 grams thats 50 grams heavier than the Samsung Galaxy s9+ and the Huawei P20 Pro. Quite a lot I think.

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2018 at 21:09 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

TheDarmok74: I am confused as to OIS. I thoguht it had it but only in photo mode.
Your specs seem to indicate that it only has it for the tele lens.
So there is no OIS in the 27mm equ lens? Is it really all electronic / digital stabilization for WA shots?

I think only the 8 mp zoom lens has the OIS. The "main" wide angle lens has EIS.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2018 at 15:16 UTC

Haha wunderbar!

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2018 at 13:25 UTC as 100th comment
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: _Interesting. But I always thought that the real first "good" camera phone was an
Ericsson the K750 with 2mp?

io_bg hehe good joke :)

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2018 at 12:27 UTC

_Interesting. But I always thought that the real first "good" camera phone was an
Ericsson the K750 with 2mp?

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2018 at 18:38 UTC as 24th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: @DPR I wonder why the specs says "1.8 max aperture"? Isn´t it fixed, always 1.8?

Salesguy, Im sorry but you are wrong, its the front camera of the pixel 2 that has F2.4 aperture. And its fixed to F1.8 at the back camera.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2018 at 01:20 UTC

@DPR I wonder why the specs says "1.8 max aperture"? Isn´t it fixed, always 1.8?

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2018 at 04:01 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
On article Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ (61 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheDarmok74: Thicker glass on the screen...ok, but what about the backside? The S8 was a joke in that department. Tons of youtube videos show how easily it breaks. Samsung has been showing us fpr years how tough they are on their phones in torture tests, droping them and tumbling them. And then a 50cm fall is enough to break the back glass.
To me, this is a reason to avoid that phone, because I'm not paying 800€ plus for a stylish phone that needs to disapear in a bumper in order to use it daily in real life conditions, where a phone will eventually slip you out of your hands at some point.

Im happy you let us know the reasons why YOU wont buy it. Thank you.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 13:14 UTC
Total: 91, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »