Murat Sahan

Joined on Nov 10, 2012

Comments

Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Samsung Galaxy S9+ sample gallery (76 comments in total)
In reply to:

steviewa: It's just a shame about the rest of the phone, ie screen, audio quality, menu system and reliability

@steviewa
There ís NO Samsung 7+ but there is an Apple 7+ ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2018 at 17:17 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S9+ sample gallery (76 comments in total)

Seems ok up to ISO 400 - but I did return my galaxy S9+ and going for the P20 Pro.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2018 at 17:15 UTC as 13th comment | 4 replies

I checked it out on the Sony website it was 236 grams thats 50 grams heavier than the Samsung Galaxy s9+ and the Huawei P20 Pro. Quite a lot I think.

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2018 at 21:09 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

TheDarmok74: I am confused as to OIS. I thoguht it had it but only in photo mode.
Your specs seem to indicate that it only has it for the tele lens.
So there is no OIS in the 27mm equ lens? Is it really all electronic / digital stabilization for WA shots?

I think only the 8 mp zoom lens has the OIS. The "main" wide angle lens has EIS.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2018 at 15:16 UTC

Haha wunderbar!

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2018 at 13:25 UTC as 99th comment
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: _Interesting. But I always thought that the real first "good" camera phone was an
Ericsson the K750 with 2mp?

io_bg hehe good joke :)

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2018 at 12:27 UTC

_Interesting. But I always thought that the real first "good" camera phone was an
Ericsson the K750 with 2mp?

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2018 at 18:38 UTC as 24th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: @DPR I wonder why the specs says "1.8 max aperture"? Isn´t it fixed, always 1.8?

Salesguy, Im sorry but you are wrong, its the front camera of the pixel 2 that has F2.4 aperture. And its fixed to F1.8 at the back camera.

Link | Posted on Mar 8, 2018 at 01:20 UTC

@DPR I wonder why the specs says "1.8 max aperture"? Isn´t it fixed, always 1.8?

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2018 at 04:01 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
On article Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ (61 comments in total)
In reply to:

TheDarmok74: Thicker glass on the screen...ok, but what about the backside? The S8 was a joke in that department. Tons of youtube videos show how easily it breaks. Samsung has been showing us fpr years how tough they are on their phones in torture tests, droping them and tumbling them. And then a 50cm fall is enough to break the back glass.
To me, this is a reason to avoid that phone, because I'm not paying 800€ plus for a stylish phone that needs to disapear in a bumper in order to use it daily in real life conditions, where a phone will eventually slip you out of your hands at some point.

Im happy you let us know the reasons why YOU wont buy it. Thank you.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 13:14 UTC
On article Sony Xperia XZ2 brings 4K HDR video to smartphones (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: How is the ois?

Ty for the reply. Well that sucks and should be pointed out in the article as it suggests that the phones are geard towards videographers.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 13:27 UTC
On article Sony Xperia XZ2 brings 4K HDR video to smartphones (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

wklee: I am going to presume that the XZ2 doesn't support RAW in spite of RAW support being first introduced in Lollipop? My Xperia X Compact doesn't.

The US is unlikely to get the fingerprint reader. It's there but needs to be flashed with European ROM to get the fingerprint reader to work, voiding warranty.

Samsung and LG has RAW

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 13:13 UTC
On article Sony Xperia XZ2 brings 4K HDR video to smartphones (49 comments in total)

How is the ois?

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 12:29 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

aramgrg: Aperture size with no sensor size info gives no info. This is dpreview, not a random youtuber review, please update that info at least.

n not the same as in s7 its different even if some things are the same

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 10:24 UTC
In reply to:

SimenO1: 77 and 45 degrees FOV, is that diagonal or vertical?
Or just as good: What is the 35mm equivalent focal lengths and apertures?

i think 24 and 56 mm

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 10:20 UTC
In reply to:

Jaekae: Phones take images that look good on phones, nowhere else

Really? Well I am reading this on my big 42 inch screen and the pics looks great.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2018 at 21:36 UTC

I feel a sudden desire to go out and shoot!

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2018 at 13:48 UTC as 26th comment
On a photo in the Pixel 2 sample gallery sample gallery (2 comments in total)

Very nice lowlight pics. Im impressed

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2018 at 16:47 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

soundimageplusblog: What amazes me is that in neither image has anybody bothered to get rid of the ugly plane trail in the top left hand corner. First thing I would have done.

Other thing to mention is if you are making a living from your photography, don't post images on the internet that are good enough quality to be stolen or used without permission. Or if you do don't complain about it. Sure Canon are thieving weasels in this case, but surely it's up to us as photographers to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen to our work.

You must be totally unable to see tings from other peoples perspective proven by your total lack of understanding for what this is about.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2018 at 19:06 UTC
In reply to:

so-what-17: Not bashing Sony, they've come a long way. but i did buy the a6000 when it first came out but the pictures looked over saturated and pastel'ish, so took it back. so used to the canon colors i guess and being slightly color blind and that fact that hdr'ish looking pictures is not what i want... the a9 has so many nice things about it just wish it had a option for a canon senor...so i figured that all of you Sony shooter or Sony sensors shooters have to under expose your picture and bring them up in photo shop to make them look OK thats the dynamic range you brag about not getting noise when you bring up the exposure at low iso. so at least with canon i can just shoot with the camera and have perfect pictures(as long as the iso is low canon has that problem when you crank the iso up of noise) without spending to much time with photo shop. and i would buy this camera in a heart beat but its the hdr'sh colors i don't like...

"Not much time needed" for PP is still boring and 2 much. Personally I like to shoot, NO PP unless really really needed.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 17:43 UTC
Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »