photogalleryonline

Lives in Australia Melbourne, Australia
Joined on Dec 12, 2003

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14

Can't wait to see this in a Nikon F mount, what a great low light still camera with 4k video this would be

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2014 at 02:37 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2081 comments in total)
In reply to:

srados: 2-3 years ago I was trying Oly's(many of them) in a camera show, with not so challenging lighting situation.All Olympus cameras did struggle to focus...Pentax too.I do not know did this did improved lately. I know 3 years are like 1000 years in technology terms, passed.

Canon/Nikon did not had issues in focusing...My impression from Olympus that they struggle in that(focusing) department.

Funny I am selling my E-M5 OMD for just this issue, I don't know why everybody says it has great autofocusing, its crap in low light, hunts all the time back and forth in video low light, and i am talking sitting around the dinner table at a restaurant with full overhead lighting it hunts! A compact camera can do better. The Nikon D300s I have never has this problem. Does anybody own an OMD E-M1 is it any good at focusing in low light? I am wanting one for underwater photography, was going to buy a housing for the E-M5 but gave up on that idea because of this low light issue with autofocus

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2014 at 03:08 UTC

Why don't they make the FE 70-200 f4G OSS in an A Mount, they would sell more of that lens in A than with an E mount I expect

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 08:39 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies

Great Super Zoom camera, 1in sensor and Zeiss 24-200 f2.8 are amazing, the 1/3200 max shutter is going to be a real problem without ND filters. What a great box of electronics designed to be a nice format (DSLR like) camera. If it is fast operationally as well, then seems like they have hit a home run with this camera! I am sure a screw on adaptor to give 280 F4 and 400 F5.6 will be available in time. The perfect camera from 24-400?

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 08:11 UTC as 38th comment | 3 replies

First Impressions = Its Ugly.
Second Impression is = I am confused so we have A FF ,A APS-C, E APS-C and now E FF, what for? Why does one need E FF when you have A FF?

Sony now is wasting all of their development time and money on yet another new lens system in E FF.

What we really need Sony is the A99 for the A77 price, just add wifi and 120fs and maybe say 2.5k, then you have a you beaut camera for FF and Video

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 07:52 UTC as 47th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Jim Evidon: Re.: Fresh paint on obsolete targets.
Bureaucracy, like nature, has certain immutable rules. One of those rules is that a bureaucracy, once created, can never be destroyed. Another rule is that a bureaucracy's budget, one created can be increased, but never be diminished.

As a result, there is, no doubt, a federal "Department of Resolution Test Chart Maintenance" which dutifully fulfills its destined mission and regularly repaints
and/or refurbishes these targets. It is, no doubt, manned and/or womaned by dedicated servants of the citizenry numbering in the hundreds to carry out its mission and its destiny. Said task force, speculatively, is primarily charged with records keeping, producing and updating mil specs for the specific paint required together with one painter and staff.

Wheres the guy to mow the grass but!

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2013 at 07:19 UTC

Ok dpreview, it seems every month now we have the "world's fastest AF*" on each new camera launched. Can we get some empirical evidence, some analytical tests some good ol dpreview know how to ensure us it is actually the world fastest, be great to include in some sort of test in reviews other than, it appears faster than the previous model...or am I just the "world's fastest person*" to recognise this? I know its hard to get an apple v apple test but at least it be an understanding more than what we have today.

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 09:13 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies

T2.9 is that like F1.4 or f2.8 or f4, does anyone have a chart for comparing T stop to F stop?

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2012 at 20:55 UTC as 13th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

photogalleryonline: Minolta made a great 400mm f4.5 for about $6k, i picked one up for $2.8K from a japan dealer new once Konica bought Minolta out and they were stuck with stock. It is a fantastically sharp len with simply amazing colour rendition. I do hope Sony redo this lens with SSM, but I am now terrified that once they slap a Sony badge on it they'll want $10K for it.

The price of this 500 f4 is simply crazy! Oh and made to order, what planet do they live on?? ....From a very dissatisfied A77 customer.

Sorry AUD, was $6,000 AUD dollars back in the day new. cheers.

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2012 at 09:21 UTC

With spec like this, you have to ask yourself why we spend $2,000 + on fancier Nikon bodies. Hey if this gets dust and moisture in it, just throw it away and buy another one!

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 20:42 UTC as 64th comment | 1 reply
On article Wi-Fi and Samsung's 'Smart Camera Ecosystem' (44 comments in total)

I think Samsung should be commended for making their entire range wifi friendly. I really like the idea of getting home after a shoot and not having to dick around with connecting cables and downloading shots. As long as your wifi router, computer or PS3, and camera are turned on, the camera will back itself up to your hard drive. This is what I have been waiting for. Now does anybody know if the Nikon D800 can do this?

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2012 at 20:26 UTC as 13th comment
On article Dan Chung asks Canon about EOS-1D C at 4K launch (88 comments in total)

Imagine the day when you spend your $1000k on a DSLR and you think nothing of shooting 4k video cause your ipad, iphone and TV etc plays 4k native, i'm tipping its only 4/5 years away.......I am just waiting for the day that all devises can beam to a screen or hd drive or cloud without all the current d$cking around of wifi, dnla, ip, wep and cable rubbish we have to deal with now. I mean can't apple make the bloody ipad suck the photos off my camera without me having to plug in an adaptor, then wait for about an hour, just to view the pics on its nice screen....mmm.... or worse still, put em on your computer, then put em on your goflex wifi hd drive, then stream them to your ipad....mmmmm, and when is wifi dslr native coming so i don't have to buy another bloody adaptor.....sorry gripes for today finished. Yes beautiful 4k Canon cameras...I wonder if Nikon is planning a similar step into Cinema Production, I'm sure you could do something with 36 million pixels other than fill my HD!

Link | Posted on Apr 16, 2012 at 11:15 UTC as 20th comment | 2 replies

Minolta made a great 400mm f4.5 for about $6k, i picked one up for $2.8K from a japan dealer new once Konica bought Minolta out and they were stuck with stock. It is a fantastically sharp len with simply amazing colour rendition. I do hope Sony redo this lens with SSM, but I am now terrified that once they slap a Sony badge on it they'll want $10K for it.

The price of this 500 f4 is simply crazy! Oh and made to order, what planet do they live on?? ....From a very dissatisfied A77 customer.

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 23:11 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies

Well now that dpreview has opended the door on hd digital production cameras i'd like to see a review of the arri alexa, red scarlet, sony f3 cine alta and this new eos c300, a group comparison would be lovely thanks!

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2011 at 07:57 UTC as 8th comment
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14