morningoil

Gorgeous images on your Flickr, by the way, Ernie.

I think that must've been someone else - however, I think it can make the perceived NR stronger, as it's trying to retrieve/portray less detail. Yes, sorry, I should've been clearer - when I say ...

Oh, believe me, I have! And I still find myself reluctantly preferring DP. I pride myself on delivering the best basic IQ in the industry in my little niche (whether or not they're the best images ...

I honestly still get unacceptable artefacting with XD on any Noise Model setting; less pronouncedly at lower settings, admittedly. It breaks my heart because I can see the clear benefits across ...

Oh in case anyone's coming across this same thing, it does periodically slow right down for me - ~15secs to close to 2 mins. Not sure why it does it, but it does. But, a quick restart of the app ...

Definitely DP. XD is undoubtedly more efficient at cleaning up noise, but unfortunately it has a tendency to make sh*t up in a way that is unacceptable to me (and believe me, I've gone back and ...

Well, Ian ... Mobile 3070Ti @ 140W, so, not the fastest, but adequate. The point being that, no, there does (or did) appear to be a possible issue besides one's GPU. As I say, I'll continue to have ...

Don't be - per my above post, when working properly it does seem to be taking a little longer (maybe 10-20% more per image?) but clearly there was some sort of resource allocation or some other ...

Well, I take it back. It's now zooming through them (well, 17s per images, but still, much more in line). Not sure what was happening ... I'll let the forum know if I gain any insight ...

Trying out the new DPXD today and I'm in agreement with everyone else - without being night or day, a very clear, consistent and demonstrable improvement in noise, detail, and indeed colour ...