Lives in United States High Bridge, United States
Works as a Professional Photographer
Joined on Sep 23, 2005


Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
On article Canon updates firmware for EOS-1D X (72 comments in total)

PLEASE come out for the 5DIII.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2014 at 17:39 UTC as 23rd comment
On article 5 photography apps to download to your new iPad (151 comments in total)

And where is FilterStorm, it also support layers!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 13:03 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Peiasdf: 24-105mm F/4 or 24-150mm F/4?

Well a 14-205 would be a nice lens, actually.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 17:54 UTC

i didnt respect this first image, until I found out why its impressive.
"The image itself measures 73 by 143 inches (190 cm × 360 cm), while the frame measures 81 by 151 inches (210 cm × 380 cm)"
also, F- the rule of thirds, eh?

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2013 at 19:49 UTC as 95th comment | 3 replies

I like that NO ONE has mentioned that this grip is 2X the weight of the Canon one. Shooting weddings all day, i need a VG and i want it to be as light as possible. For the extra $100 over the canon from BHPhoto, ill spend it to save 200g.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2013 at 05:29 UTC as 4th comment | 2 replies
On article We put the HTC One's ultrapixels to the test (172 comments in total)
In reply to:

yabokkie: not big deal but I think this is a 1/3.2" sensor of near 16 mm2. not 1/3" as HTC call it.

a larger pixel sensor won't deliver better image quality but it does contribute to lower costs of the sensor itself, the processing chip and memory, as well as more tolerance to lower quality lens and harsh assembly.

Except there is a loss when you divide it. Imagine changing all million dollars to pennies, but having to count EACH penny. You will inherently loose more money miscounting pennies than $10,000 bills. Each pixel has to count photons, but also has its own read noise. Less photons PER pixel (smaller pixels) + the SAME read noise per pixel means LESS Signal to Noise.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 14:15 UTC
On article We put the HTC One's ultrapixels to the test (172 comments in total)

Looks like the soft image problem is a Coma issue. Look at the shape of the lights. Maybe as its focusing it get out of alignment, refocusing 'fixes' it?

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 13:57 UTC as 12th comment

And what about the Props to Daft Punk for the music??

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2013 at 20:16 UTC as 29th comment
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11