da_habakuk

nice review - but the music is kinda annoying (or too loud?)

all wide open with the samyang 135. i was surprised how easy it was to focus. the EVF on a7r3 really helps. little ape hanging around ape dance maestro at work lady in brown

the 1670 is quite good. great contrast. corners are not perfect but good. if u get a decentered one let it be centered on warranty - thats what i did. cost: zero. buuut to make long story short: ...

sigma to the rescue!!11!

do yourself a favour and only bring one cam or at least only from one manufacturer. take the camera which u know/like best and fill the gap with a new lens. i would take the a sony fe 16-35 and ...

for landscape shots (f8-f11), the 10-18 and the 16-35 on 24mp wont be that much different other than maybe contrast and sunstars. at least my copies. only on my R3 i can also notice an increase in ...

better contrast and much better flare resistance. if u dont shoot against the sun often...just go for the cheapo.

for your needs the a6000 will be fine. u should try out if u like the jpg colors - i think the a6400 is different there - many say more pleasant but u can configure lots of stuff on colors for jpg ...

that will be easy: the 18-300 is not available in sony e-mount so why bother with adapter? also the 18-135 is really good quality and really tiny. i doubt something like a 18-300 will be better ...

1, used orignal protector on a6000. dont use anything on my a6500. 2, no using protector makes the screen easier smudgy over time.

does this update fix the sigma 1.4 "AFS-" or "f2.0-bug" ? :) anyone who had issues tried this? just curious...

slow focus in low light is more of a body issue than a lens issue. even my a6500 is slow in lowlight (with sigma 1.4 lenses) it should be better than the a6000 which i had - according to specs - ...

i can agree in all points. the 18-135 is a great landscape lens at f8  with a perfect mixture in size and weight and performance - i love mine and sold the 16-70 and also the 55-210. also the a6500 ...

well, u have to switch if you want wider.. but 18mm is a good allaround FL on aps-c. so its up to u if u need the focal range and can live with its size (compared to the 1650) - the size of the ...

i never liked the 16-55pz because of the powerzoom. the 55-210 was okayish but nothing to write home about. i bought the 18-135 and it replaced my 16-70 and also my 55-210. it has good sharpness ...

or at least in a rangefinder body - just a little bit bigger. i hate the a7 design. my nose is always touching the screen and its not THAT big ;)

Kilimanjaro White-eye (darktable edit)

the first one. i guess its mostly because of the foreground and its also brighter :) keep them coming

u didnt mention what kind of sport and if indoor or outdoor. a cheap option would be the FE85mm 1.8 but it may be too short for your needs...

yup it is. the dxo measurements are quite accurate and shows also how my copy performs. that is after my optics were replaced because of heavy decentering. nonetheless stopped down its good for ...