le_alain

Tittle was A6000 image sensor.
and he tested on A6000 sensor, not A7. So what ?

Perhaps already too mch processing.

Nope,
years ago, Leica did it, Cosina did it

Nope

@Raynaud
Class leading is always for a short time.
I am happy with very great, which was class leading at its time :)

The 24-105 is a far better lense than both on FF and a light lense for a 24-105, NB, f:2.8 in APSC (or crop mode) is ~ f4 in FF

"the new Z lenses are gathering more light to the sensor due to that rear element/mount size and with the rear element being much closer to the sensor"
.. can you explain it ?

@Conrad,
50mm in 35mm format was a standard years before the 1st 35mm SLR came out...
Even the 1st "Popular" 35mm Leica 1 in 1925 had a fixed 5cm focal lense, and has you said, 50 mm F2 or F1.4...

Dis you read the manual ? there are limitations. For instance, are you in silent mode or do you use the mechanical shutter ?

Try to shoot raw, your jpeg are "destroyed" by noise reduction, and will improve immediately quality. If You go FF, Keep in mind you will have far less DOF with FF you have some option of Sony, ...

where is the Pen F II ...?
with a good EVF and autofocus that works ?
;)

maljo@inreach.com
with lightroom you get lightroom

A R-D1 with 24Mpx :)

There would be no more bayer pattern, but still reading the sensor as if there was one, and loosing the definition of a mochrom sensor

Sorry for my English, but sur you didn't understand

@ Gannon Burgett
Xiaomi note 8 pro is 64Mpx and 200$ i don't remeber reading of it here ?

That you could print A3 if pixel were good enough ;)

almost is the difference between 24 an 28
Tamron is not for me :)

It was a joke no ...?

"Very old tech "
"and it does reduce light transmission significantly."
????