Foggy8

All wonderful choices. My dual lens option was based more on economy and a small footprint, but still covering a lot of focal lengths.

Alternative to the holy trinity. Binity? My m4/3 choice for the two lens version of the holy trinity is the Olympus 14-150mm paired with the 9mm F2.8 Laowa.

For travel: 10-20mm Nikkor 35mm 1.8 DX Nikkor 55-200mm  (lightest weight)

Same camera as the OP. PLUS a Nikon D750 feature-wise (works with Ai, AF, AF-D, etc lenses) with no adapter , but the size and weight of the Nikon FM2/FE2. That would be perfect.

I get it. Point well taken.

Yes, thanks everyone for your ideas and comments. The Canon G9 x is the closest thing. Not as small as I would have liked, but it has a 1" sensor.

Good point about the pocket dust. Ideally I'd like a camera that would fit into a jeans pocket which the RX100 series will not, but the dust would be a problem.

The last truly pocketable RAW camera might have been the Canon S120. I am still using the Panasonic DMC-FX150 with RAW capability and a 1/1.63" sensor from 2008 and it performs wonderfully. Is ...

Minette makes a very high quality cloth covered cable release. Only available in the smaller stores, but a google search should locate them.

For my purposes where EXIF data does not exist and I am describing a photo, a lens or a certain "look", your XXmm (YYmm FFE) notation is right on the money. Thank you and the other posters for the ...

Yes, if you can live with 12MP, the Casio ZR-5000 has a 19mm (equivalent) lens. Casio ZR-5000 at the widest setting 19mm (equivalent)

True. In the film days  "40mm look" meant the same thing to almost everyone. If we say "I like the 40mm look" nowadays , that phrase is meaningless.

Thank you. Maybe 28/42FFE so that photo enthusiasts will understand what I'm trying to convey.

I hate having to keep writing "35mm equivalent" or "full frame equivalent" when I am describing the lens that I used to make the image. It is easier to write 28/42 to describe using a 28mm lens on ...