lumenite

Oh, thank you for your search. R7 and R10 shares many things with R3!

Is it true with R7 alone or with all RF bodies?

I think a very similar thought as yours. Actually I am quite satisfied with the lenses that the M mount provides currently. What I want is just an M body with the all the features of R7, such as a ...

Canon has R3, R5, R6, R, and RP, but where are glasses such as 20, 24L, 28, 35L, 50/1.4, and 135L? I do not think Canon would release RFS 16/1.4, 32/1.4, and 56/1.4 sooner than the RF lenses ...

The best time to get something is when it is needed. :) Where and how did you buy your things at such a good price?

R7 - 4K 60 fps, but using line skipping or cropped. I do not know about R3 in this regard.

+1 If you can be satisfied with RP, then RP would be wonderful. However, since R6 sits in your mind already, RP must be a body that you are going to use temporarily. So go for R6 and then collect ...

If your thought is the case, EOS M system would last much longer! Or indeed, it would mean that Canon won't end M. Prices at release M5, $980; R10, $980 M 15-45, $300; R 18-45, $300 M 18-150, $500; ...

If Canon releases RFS 32 f/1.4, it would be a big surprise. One thing I do not like regarding Sigma 16mm is its big, heavy form. On the other hand, 56mm is wonderful in every aspect. It would take ...

I am interested in the reason why you sold RP for M6ii. In your equipment list, I see there is EOS R. If you did not have R, would you give up a full frame camera for M6mk2? I would like to know ...

Well, currently they have EFS 10-18, 10-22, 17-55, 18-55, 18-135 , and 24mm. But they are about to release RFS 18-45 and 18-150mm, and I do not think that Canon would release RFS 15-85 or 17-85 in ...

No, especially if we use an entry-level DSLR camera. There is a wonderful native lens called Sigma 56mm f/1.4 for the focal length of 50/56mm. Some used EFS lenses might be good options, if not the ...

In my opinion, there would be no significant difference between them in terms of their image quality, although EFS version is better than EFM. You can look at some comparisons between EFM 18-150 ...

Since you have 15-45mm, I would recommend the following lenses: First, 32mm f/1.4. Second, 22mm f/2. And many would speak highly of 11-22mm. But I would encourage you to consider 55-200mm. Of ...

Your point is one of my worries for RFS and one of my reliefs for EFM. Canon has never produced EF-S 30/32/35 1.4. Not even 50 1.4 II. The same reason might also be true with RF-S 15mm because of ...

In my opinion, Canon has not made M series to replace APSC Rebels. Now they are about to truly replace them with RFS bodies. So to my eyes M system has been playing another role in another ...

What a good idea! At least I have some time until Canon meets all the requirements. Until then, let's enjoy what we have in our hands. :)

As for now, one of the main reasons to stay with M is its having the trio of 22, 32, and 11-22. But what would most of us do when Canon reproduces those in RFS mount? And what if Canon releases a ...

In my opinion, it would be better if R7 were called as R9. R7 is in a little lower position than 7D, but a little upper position than x0D. If it had been the case, the successors to R and RP could ...

This is for R7; R10 does not have Canon Log 3 option.