PF511

Congrats on your little one! I think your problem is that combining a shutter speed of 1/100 with a f/1.4 aperture is too slow and/or too shallow to get sharp shots consistently, especially indoors. ...

Sean Tucker

I've seen this on indoor pictures shot in mixed/low light. In those cases, I just use one of the Adobe built in color profiles. I don't know if this is a problem with OOC JPG, as I use B&W ...

Bring the Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 or another ultra-wide lens, for architecture, scenics, monuments, etc.  I also brought a vintage Olympus OM 100mm that worked great for me, though I was not attempting ...

This is the warercolor effect, and there has been lots and lots and lots of discussion about this on the forum.  Basically, Lightroom deals with Fuji X-trans files poorly, and you have to do one ...

Imaging Resource finds the Fuji slightly sharper than the Sony (click the charts to compare). Not sure of their methodology, but I've always found their sharpness charts useful.

Just want to second everything Erwin said here.  Your lens isn't necessarily bad, and wind plus 10 second exposure is absolutely going to result in soft images.

Thanks for this comprehensive review! In your review you said: The smaller brother of the X-T3 does not have a dedicated ISO dial, but one can of course tailor some of the function buttons to the ...

FWIW, it takes 15 seconds on mine, and I have an old Radeon R9 270X with a Ryzen 1600X. For OP - this is an excellent example of where the enhance details function really works!

No experience, but Randall Herrera on Youtube didn't have great things to say about the X-T2 and Fringer combo, but the X-T3 was much better for him with the Fringer.

Love the color toning on these!  Excellent work!

There's a video review from Randall Herrera of the Sigma 18-35 lens with the Fringer adapter on an X-T3 .  Randall reviewed the same adapter and lens with the X-T2 and his experience wasn't nearly ...

Not a professional, and I'd rather shoot than process, s I keep it simple.  sRGB is effectively the standard in that it's what most people will see.  Post-processing takes enough time without ...

The 24 Mpix cameras have significantly better autofocus. You're right that you can make bigger prints with more megapixels, but that may or may not be compelling to you.

I don't mean to thread crap, but the colors on 2 are terrible.  The photo looks like it has white balance issues at a minimum.  I have to think whatever tool that was could do better. It also looks ...

Because they're less expensive.  No one would force you to buy them.

Most likely even the cheapest modern GPU will do. Mine is 4 or 5 years old and it works fine.

I would vote for the 18-55 and a 12mm.  I wouldn't take either the 18mm or the 27mm, since your existing lens covers those focal lengths.  I took a lot of photos in Europe that wouldn't have been ...

Go for the 35mm f/2, no question. You're going to be spending a lot of time indoors and in close proximity to your baby for the first year and those other lenses are too long as a first lens until ...

This completely, utterly and totally wrong.  You didn't mention dual card slots!