Don Wiss

Lives in United States Brooklyn, NY, United States
Works as a programmer
Has a website at http://donwiss.com/
Joined on Aug 3, 2005

Comments

Total: 23, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Don Wiss: I see the function keys are still backwards. The defaults on the keys are the never used functions to control the screen, volume, etc. And to get to the function keys, you have to shift. I use the function keys dozens of times a day: F2 to rename a file, Alt-F4 to close the program, Ctrl-F4 to close the window. Whomever designed the keyboard must be brain dead. I wouldn't touch it.

Some, or maybe all, Lenovos are also backwards.

@Steve Wilson. I only go by the picture. What do your keys look like? Which is big, and which is small and in a lower corner?

Link | Posted on May 24, 2017 at 09:22 UTC

I see the function keys are still backwards. The defaults on the keys are the never used functions to control the screen, volume, etc. And to get to the function keys, you have to shift. I use the function keys dozens of times a day: F2 to rename a file, Alt-F4 to close the program, Ctrl-F4 to close the window. Whomever designed the keyboard must be brain dead. I wouldn't touch it.

Some, or maybe all, Lenovos are also backwards.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2017 at 02:15 UTC as 42nd comment | 10 replies
In reply to:

dweberphotography: Maybe someone here can answer this for me:

What is the difference between Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds? Is the sensor size different?

And with a shorter flange-back distance the lens can be smaller.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 15:49 UTC

I do remember putting diskettes into a Sony Mavica. I borrowed one for a trip in March 1999. Here are the pictures:

http://donwiss.com/pictures/Barbados-1999/
http://donwiss.com/pictures/St-Lucia-1999/

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 02:17 UTC as 94th comment

"make sure it's a nice multiple of 222 pixels wide for Pinterest"

They used to be a multiple of 192. I set my site up for that. I just went to Pinterest. I find them today to be about 236 wide. A moving target!

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2013 at 11:31 UTC as 9th comment
On article Picasa web is now redirecting to Google+ (44 comments in total)

There is one thing that is very consistent with Google products: They are all over-engineered. If you just want a simple photo album Google is not the place to use.

They have even over-engineered a simple search. If you think that every word you enter should be on the returned pages you are wrong. Google has decided that it is smarter than you. Some of the words you entered Google decides are optional. You can put double quotes around each word. That generally makes it a required word, but not necessarily. You can see this as you add words. You think that you are going to get fewer results? Nope. You add more words and the number of results increases. Instead of putting the expected ANDs in between your words, Google is putting ORs.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2013 at 21:22 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Thoughts: Just checked... 810 grams ! not fun to walk around or go on a holiday in summer days with this lens.

That was the number I was looking for. Switch to m4/3 and for 520g you can get 600mm equivalent. I'm now waiting for the next Panasonic body and then I'll make the switch.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2012 at 12:10 UTC
In reply to:

Boris F: GH3 is coming closer!
Is it prelude for it?

My dealer does not like the ergonomics of the OMD. He writes: "it is rather small in my opinion. The buttons and layout are a little cramped in comparison to other m4/3 that I know will be out later this year (one in June & the other in October)."
Now he is under non-disclosure. So I don't know what these bodies are. Or whether they are Olympus or Panasonic. But based on what should be coming out, one would expect these to be the replacements for the G3 and GH2. And based on past releases (the G3 was announced in May and the GH2 was announced in September) I'm hoping that the G3 replacement is the first one. Though the G3 is one year old, and the GH2 is two years old. So the GH2 replacement could be first.

Link | Posted on May 21, 2012 at 09:42 UTC
On article User Guide: Getting the most out of the Olympus E-M5 (270 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mssimo: sorry..but we need a guide on how to get a e-M5 before we know how to use it ;)

I just stopped by at Focus Camera to hold one. They had none on display, but he did have some in stock. Getting back home I find on their website they list the black body with the kit lens as being in stock.

I wanted to hold one as I have a contact that is arguing it is too small and I should wait until the June or September ones come out. Presumably he's referring to the next Panasonic models.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2012 at 21:09 UTC
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review (572 comments in total)
In reply to:

fz750: I haven't had my mitts on one yet, but seen a couple in local shop windows and at first I thought it had a telephoto lens attached but on closer inspection it's just a normal 12-50mm?

How come it's so long? Seems twice as long as the one on my E-PL2 ??

The reason for the fixed larger size, over the extending, is so they could weather seal it.

Link | Posted on Apr 30, 2012 at 22:54 UTC
On article Olympus releases firmware v1.1 update for OM-D E-M5 (41 comments in total)
In reply to:

Streetsmart: They don't even have the E-M5 I pre-ordered months ago in stock
But hey it already has a firmware update how great !!!

I hope the camera is available before the rebate expires on May 31st.

Link | Posted on Apr 18, 2012 at 22:50 UTC

I doubt things are back to normal in that 2000 acre alluvial plain in Thailand that was flooded last Fall. For one, hard drive prices are still way up.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2012 at 15:20 UTC as 27th comment
On article Dpreview product database now mobile (37 comments in total)

I'd like to see the database include external flashes.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2012 at 02:45 UTC as 35th comment | 1 reply
On article Images of Panasonic GF5 start to appear (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Steve_: Who cares about the body; did they fix the lens?

@Steve. You should specify which lens you think needs fixing.

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 00:43 UTC
On article Images of Panasonic GF5 start to appear (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Almeida: Is this an editorial change that's here to stay? Will we start to have rumors on DPReview?

I'm glad they are now posting rumors here. I'd rather not have to hunt the web for them. And if we can assume that they have one under a non-disclosure, then they aren't going to pass on a rumor that they know isn't real.

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 00:41 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M5 low light high ISO sample series (283 comments in total)

This has image stabilization in the body. Panasonic has it in the lens. How well do the Panasonic lenses work on this? I would presume you can't have two IMs at the same time, and you turn off the one in the lens?

Link | Posted on Mar 9, 2012 at 21:19 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Coyote_Cody: 18mp in 1/2.3" sensor, who really needs this??
The 16mp already was compromised to the point that it had no more resolution than a 10 or 12mp via noise reduction, even though Sony did wonders with it!

Silly, Silly, Silly!!!

Yep. Posting one's pictures on the web is the way it is done these days. What use is a picture 4896 x 3672 pixels? No monitor exists close to that size.

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2012 at 11:02 UTC
On article DxO Labs launches Optics Pro 7.1 for Mac and Windows (95 comments in total)

I see they are listing mirrorless cameras. I thought those cameras had lens correction built in? What does this software give me for a m4/3 camera?

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2011 at 18:41 UTC as 41st comment | 1 reply
Total: 23, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »