Lives in United States FL, United States
Joined on Sep 14, 2011


Total: 198, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

This Leica EVF seems so good that all the Leica manual focus M lenses can be used like one could use them on the Leica M rangefinder

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 01:24 UTC as 41st comment | 1 reply
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1494 comments in total)

wonder when an EVF like this Leica EVF will find its way in more affordable cameras. Then manual focus will be nice again

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2015 at 18:01 UTC as 523rd comment

Sony (IMO) is taking advantage of the Nikon/Canon reluctance to do what Olympus did: Go full speed mirrorless (while still providing support for the owners of dslr lenses).
Canon and Nikon may become dinosaurs if Sony keeps producing great FF cameras, and if Canon & Nikon don't wake up end really jump into the mirrorless wagon

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2015 at 23:08 UTC as 62nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

SeeRoy: I'm shocked that this lens won't work with my E-M5. OTOH I'm not in the market for newly manufactured antiques so I wouldn't buy it anyway. Happy.

hmm... why do you say that it will not work with the E-M5 ?
anyway... hope that the lens will be reviewed: it would be interesting to know if distortion etc are optical corrected....

Link | Posted on Sep 14, 2015 at 17:32 UTC

how does it focus in the dark?
does it heat when doing 4K video?

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2015 at 02:21 UTC as 63rd comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm XF 90mm F2 LM WR real-world samples (186 comments in total)

ok, ok... beautiful lens.... but... in mft we have the 75mm/f1.8 which is at least as good, costs way less and it is smaller and lighter.... and if your budget is tighter, then in mft you can use the Sigma 60mm/f2.8....

Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2015 at 11:30 UTC as 19th comment | 4 replies

How does it compare with the Sigma 17-70 f 2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM ?
The Sigma was praised for its IQ; now it costs $399

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2015 at 23:20 UTC as 28th comment | 2 replies

Funny, interesting and great photos.
However, giving that 50% of marriages end in divorce, which one of the two spouses will wish in thirty years that he/she thru her/him down the cliff when they had a chance?
ok - that's my bad sense of humor, so I apologize....

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2015 at 16:50 UTC as 28th comment

second: 200/4

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2015 at 11:33 UTC as 25th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Review (483 comments in total)

the specs comparison table seems to show that the E M-10 lcd is the tilting type. Isn't it fully articulated?

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2015 at 23:03 UTC as 122nd comment | 5 replies
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1176 comments in total)
In reply to:

DenWil: Wish it came with the 90 f2 installed. Wide is useless to me.

In my opinion maybe the M series of cameras and lenses are at a dead end. They can still sell them the same way they still sell the M7.
Instead, the Q is the starting point of a real modern digital Leica camera series.
They do need to develop an interchangeable Q type version and Q lenses

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 15:52 UTC
On article Leica Q In-depth Review (1176 comments in total)
In reply to:

DenWil: Wish it came with the 90 f2 installed. Wide is useless to me.

Hopefully Leica will make an interchangeable version of both the Q camera and the 28mm summilux. And of course other Q lenses: 50mm , 90mm, 135mm etc.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 23:59 UTC

I took a beautiful portrait of a face of a lady friend of mine (the lady is so beautiful that it would have been difficult, even for me, that the portrait could be ugly - and no, I am not posting it). Then unsing photoshop I made it B & W. I like the black & white version more than the original.
My point is that for certain type of photos (face portrait is my case, but there could be other cases), for certain type of photos black & white is better.
However, I cannot afford the Leica monochrome and a Leica lens unless I mortgage my house, and then manage to escape my wife reaction.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 11:28 UTC as 64th comment
On article Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 (485 comments in total)

it seems a very nice camera .....
I would buy it; but have the E M-5 and would not consider upgrading to the G7 because:
- would use the G7 with 10mm, 14mm and 25mm, but would not mount the 75mm without ibis.
- now my money needs to go to a tele (Kipon & Canon 200mm/2.8 L ?) then in a year or two will look for a new camera with ibis.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 16:53 UTC as 78th comment

Nikon 300mm/f4 ... shorter, lighter.......available next month for $ 2,000.
When will OLYMPUS release their 300mm/f4 ?????

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 12:43 UTC as 23rd comment | 4 replies
On article Sony Alpha 7 II real-world sample gallery posted (244 comments in total)

could Voigtlander manual-focus wide-angle lenses be mounted on the A7-II with an adapter? anyone did that?

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2015 at 14:32 UTC as 6th comment | 1 reply
On article Editorial: 2014's Homepage Highlights (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valentinian: Barney Britton (6): "one of the main differences in terms of performance between DSLRs and mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras has been autofocus".
Well... also the EVF still has to catch-up with the DSLR' OVF...

EVF has been improving, but it is not yet as good as OVF for manual focus

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2015 at 22:02 UTC
On article Editorial: 2014's Homepage Highlights (70 comments in total)

Barney Britton (6): "one of the main differences in terms of performance between DSLRs and mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras has been autofocus".
Well... also the EVF still has to catch-up with the DSLR' OVF...

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2015 at 14:19 UTC as 16th comment | 13 replies
On article Leica M9 users report sensor corrosion issue (379 comments in total)

Nobody need me to say that in the film era Leica was great: first class lenses, terrific range finder body.
However, now, it is not cost-effective to make perfect lenses, because the modern camera software will correct distortions and aberrations; and the camera body doesn't have to last forever, because the digital evolution makes any camera almost semi-obsolete after a few years compared to the new developed ones.
Sorry, Leica: you were a dream..... Now you are a memory of excellence. But to take photos other cameras are more fit.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2014 at 17:36 UTC as 42nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

ThePhilips: The LX100 made me realize what's missing.

No matter how hard I look at it, I see LX100 as nothing else but a m43 camera with a premium 12-35 zoom glued to it. There is no point for me to buy the LX100 as a camera - (if I decide to buy it) I would be buying it as a "lens" for my m43 collection.

And that made me realize: the missing are an LX101 with 100-300mm eq lens and an LX102 with 7-20mm eq lens. If Pana engineers have managed to cram the 12-35 into such dimensions, I'm pretty sure they can also do some magic with the longer and the wider lenses. LX100 is targeted at pro/semi-pro/enthusiasts. But to cover the market better, they also have to differentiate with the lenses: some users like it wider, some users like it longer. I'd definitely buy the LX102. And very likely the LX101. But LX100? I have already two lenses covering the "standard" range...

I "liked" your first paragraph: it was a great thing to say that the LX100 is actually .... a lens !
actually, a very good lens: why would you buy a 12-35/2.8 when you could buy the LX100 and have a second body?
I don't agree on your second paragraph:
while a lens like the one on the LX100 could not be made for the innterchangeable M4/3, a "good" 100-300mm equivalent can be made, and I wish it would be made, or, even better, a prime 250mm/f4.5... (just dreaming)

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2014 at 22:12 UTC
Total: 198, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »