Reading mode:
Light
Dark
![]() |
elgol20
Lives in
Germany
Works as a
Analyst
Joined on
Nov 5, 2012
|
Have your say
Have your say: Best product of 2020
- Canon EOS R533.0%
- Canon RF 70-200 F4L IS USM8.2%
- Fujifilm X-T423.4%
- Nikon Nikkor Z 50mm F1.2 S12.5%
- Sony FE 20mm F1.8G10.3%
- Sony FE 12-24mm F2.8 GM12.5%
Total voters: 1,930
Latest reviews
Finished challenges
Most popular cameras
Features
Top threads
George Zip: First !
third🐰
lot's of malguessed numbers on mortality here...
this is done too simple. just forget to switch off you tracker when doing a milkyway timelapse and you end up with this...
NickyB66: What an ugly monster Hitler was. Hope he and his regime rot in eternal hellfire.
sure, but what do you gain, what do you learn? evil figues you find in fairy tales, too
NickyB66: What an ugly monster Hitler was. Hope he and his regime rot in eternal hellfire.
It is funny since this dualistic thinking of dividing the world in good and bad from a personal point of view was one reason all this came from ...
elgol20: That will be a multiple billion dollar picture with a few pixel resolution ...
will be exiting. actually I have been waiting a long time
That will be a multiple billion dollar picture with a few pixel resolution ...
weihaowang: You can find some actual astronomical pictures taken by this scope here:
https://www.astrobin.com/users/whwang/
Four of my latest five pictures were taken with it.
You can get an idea about what you may achieve with this scope from these images. However, since these are heavily processed images, they are not quite suitable for you to evaluate the raw performance of this scope. For such a purpose, you will need to look at the raw file.
Thx!
weihaowang: You can find some actual astronomical pictures taken by this scope here:
https://www.astrobin.com/users/whwang/
Four of my latest five pictures were taken with it.
You can get an idea about what you may achieve with this scope from these images. However, since these are heavily processed images, they are not quite suitable for you to evaluate the raw performance of this scope. For such a purpose, you will need to look at the raw file.
are there any RAW files to be seen somewhere? Or adequate ones?
elgol20: Is the a way to import your LR catalogue to an Alternative?
and which would be the best? It is time for dr to really make a grand review of all the alternatives!
Is the a way to import your LR catalogue to an Alternative?
Where is the standalone version?
elgol20: blow the new 105 away? maybe use ability to logic and check this: http://foto-info.si/review-of-nikon-af-s-105mm-f1-4e-ed-and-comparison-with-nikon-af-s-85mm-f1-4g/
looking at f/4 compared to f/1.4 in the corners, this assertion is illogical: the nikon is superb! so how can another lens blow the nikon away?
just an assertion, disproof see shown link
blow the new 105 away? maybe use ability to logic and check this: http://foto-info.si/review-of-nikon-af-s-105mm-f1-4e-ed-and-comparison-with-nikon-af-s-85mm-f1-4g/
looking at f/4 compared to f/1.4 in the corners, this assertion is illogical: the nikon is superb! so how can another lens blow the nikon away?
osan: D810 has good dynamic range sure. But 4EV push for shadows is only for small prints and Facebook photos and it shows all the symptoms of over processing. The recent preoccupation with DR is blown way out of proportion.
looks like you never did landscape with high contrast ...
Sergey Borachev: Fantastic news and I say this as someone who has never owned any of its cameras. Sony deserves this. Always pushing the envelope, trying new ideas, formats, putting everything in and not holding back on technology, as well as persevering over so many years. It is finally getting it right, with the RX100, A7, and its sensors. Good to see it has a management that dare to explore and dream, and not just short-sighted beancounters. Compare that with Samsung and Canon.
shortsighted? well, maybe not. would be glad if they have had more support though like lossless raw for older 7R etc... cannot get it.
elgol20: Where is the update for the 7R, lossless RAW etc?!
yeah, sure. just that this does not sustain my trustlevel, have I not known this problem before I bought the 7R and was really underwhelmed seeing the milkyway pictures with the super sharp zeiss 55mm. the result is that bad I'd prefer any lomo pics of the milkyway ... ;)
Where is the update for the 7R, lossless RAW etc?!
No lossless RAW for 7R?
That was good. Since years I am having discussions like this, not only concerning photography. I tell people it is a bit like quantum mechanics, a probabillity calculations with systematical and nonsystematical errors and want to continue explaning. usually the discussions stops there. but nevertheless it is very interesting if you start thinking. i once visited Leica in solms and there was this really old guy shownig us around and since we were a small group with ingeniers from france too it took more than 3 hours. this guy was so great and had so much fun explaning even though he had done this for decades. than the chief ingeneer of leica optics came by and he answered our questions for at least 15 minutes or so. this was the best i have ever heard or read concerning this topic. i remember him explaining the process of manufactureing the noctilux lens, which now costs 9500 euros. you might think crazy, but it actually is not