elgol20

elgol20

Lives in Germany
Works as a Analyst
Joined on Nov 5, 2012

Comments

Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article DPReview TV: Canon RF 85mm F1.2L review (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

George Zip: First !

third🐰

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2020 at 13:12 UTC

lot's of malguessed numbers on mortality here...

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2020 at 19:59 UTC as 84th comment

this is done too simple. just forget to switch off you tracker when doing a milkyway timelapse and you end up with this...

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2019 at 14:54 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

NickyB66: What an ugly monster Hitler was. Hope he and his regime rot in eternal hellfire.

sure, but what do you gain, what do you learn? evil figues you find in fairy tales, too

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2019 at 17:59 UTC
In reply to:

NickyB66: What an ugly monster Hitler was. Hope he and his regime rot in eternal hellfire.

It is funny since this dualistic thinking of dividing the world in good and bad from a personal point of view was one reason all this came from ...

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2019 at 17:11 UTC
In reply to:

elgol20: That will be a multiple billion dollar picture with a few pixel resolution ...

will be exiting. actually I have been waiting a long time

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2019 at 05:27 UTC

That will be a multiple billion dollar picture with a few pixel resolution ...

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2019 at 19:09 UTC as 52nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

weihaowang: You can find some actual astronomical pictures taken by this scope here:
https://www.astrobin.com/users/whwang/
Four of my latest five pictures were taken with it.

You can get an idea about what you may achieve with this scope from these images. However, since these are heavily processed images, they are not quite suitable for you to evaluate the raw performance of this scope. For such a purpose, you will need to look at the raw file.

Thx!

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2019 at 12:21 UTC
In reply to:

weihaowang: You can find some actual astronomical pictures taken by this scope here:
https://www.astrobin.com/users/whwang/
Four of my latest five pictures were taken with it.

You can get an idea about what you may achieve with this scope from these images. However, since these are heavily processed images, they are not quite suitable for you to evaluate the raw performance of this scope. For such a purpose, you will need to look at the raw file.

are there any RAW files to be seen somewhere? Or adequate ones?

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2019 at 07:19 UTC
On article RIP Lightroom 6: Death by subscription model (1615 comments in total)
In reply to:

elgol20: Is the a way to import your LR catalogue to an Alternative?

and which would be the best? It is time for dr to really make a grand review of all the alternatives!

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2017 at 06:47 UTC
On article RIP Lightroom 6: Death by subscription model (1615 comments in total)

Is the a way to import your LR catalogue to an Alternative?

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2017 at 07:35 UTC as 391st comment | 2 replies

Where is the standalone version?

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 13:11 UTC as 357th comment | 7 replies
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)
In reply to:

elgol20: blow the new 105 away? maybe use ability to logic and check this: http://foto-info.si/review-of-nikon-af-s-105mm-f1-4e-ed-and-comparison-with-nikon-af-s-85mm-f1-4g/

looking at f/4 compared to f/1.4 in the corners, this assertion is illogical: the nikon is superb! so how can another lens blow the nikon away?

just an assertion, disproof see shown link

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 14:38 UTC
On article Nikon 105mm F1.4E ED sample images (279 comments in total)

blow the new 105 away? maybe use ability to logic and check this: http://foto-info.si/review-of-nikon-af-s-105mm-f1-4e-ed-and-comparison-with-nikon-af-s-85mm-f1-4g/

looking at f/4 compared to f/1.4 in the corners, this assertion is illogical: the nikon is superb! so how can another lens blow the nikon away?

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 06:27 UTC as 27th comment | 2 replies
On article Benchmark performance: Nikon D810 in-depth review (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

osan: D810 has good dynamic range sure. But 4EV push for shadows is only for small prints and Facebook photos and it shows all the symptoms of over processing. The recent preoccupation with DR is blown way out of proportion.

looks like you never did landscape with high contrast ...

Link | Posted on May 13, 2016 at 08:24 UTC
In reply to:

Sergey Borachev: Fantastic news and I say this as someone who has never owned any of its cameras. Sony deserves this. Always pushing the envelope, trying new ideas, formats, putting everything in and not holding back on technology, as well as persevering over so many years. It is finally getting it right, with the RX100, A7, and its sensors. Good to see it has a management that dare to explore and dream, and not just short-sighted beancounters. Compare that with Samsung and Canon.

shortsighted? well, maybe not. would be glad if they have had more support though like lossless raw for older 7R etc... cannot get it.

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 11:26 UTC
In reply to:

elgol20: Where is the update for the 7R, lossless RAW etc?!

yeah, sure. just that this does not sustain my trustlevel, have I not known this problem before I bought the 7R and was really underwhelmed seeing the milkyway pictures with the super sharp zeiss 55mm. the result is that bad I'd prefer any lomo pics of the milkyway ... ;)

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 07:00 UTC

Where is the update for the 7R, lossless RAW etc?!

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 06:31 UTC as 16th comment | 4 replies

No lossless RAW for 7R?

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2016 at 19:21 UTC as 37th comment | 6 replies

That was good. Since years I am having discussions like this, not only concerning photography. I tell people it is a bit like quantum mechanics, a probabillity calculations with systematical and nonsystematical errors and want to continue explaning. usually the discussions stops there. but nevertheless it is very interesting if you start thinking. i once visited Leica in solms and there was this really old guy shownig us around and since we were a small group with ingeniers from france too it took more than 3 hours. this guy was so great and had so much fun explaning even though he had done this for decades. than the chief ingeneer of leica optics came by and he answered our questions for at least 15 minutes or so. this was the best i have ever heard or read concerning this topic. i remember him explaining the process of manufactureing the noctilux lens, which now costs 9500 euros. you might think crazy, but it actually is not

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2016 at 13:07 UTC as 38th comment
Total: 27, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »