dotyman

Lives in United States San Francisco, United States
Works as a Industrial Designer
Joined on Dec 23, 2007

Comments

Total: 206, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

vesa1tahti: Nikon 30, Canon 0, Sony 0. I've been a Nikon shooter tens of years, no better camera in the world. BTW never tried any Sony or Canon,

Soooo, your opinion is based upon, um...

...lack of experience with the other cameras?

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2017 at 22:29 UTC
In reply to:

dotyman: Will be interesting to see if Manny still feels that way after another 3 months living with all the Windows issues...

Then you're not really challenging your system, are you. I suppose it's fine for a confined set of apps, but as an all-around high-end performer I doubt you've really put your setup to the test. I have both Macs and Windows computers, and the Windows computers ALWAYS have MANY more problems once I start loading them up with powerful and demanding CAD, video, photo and financial apps. My Macs have always been plug-and-play performers. I prefer to use my computers for productivity, not as an exersize in wasted troubleshooting time and frustration. Maybe if I had an IT department I would use the Windows computers more–but as a small shop, I need the dependability and flexibility that Macs provide. That's why I use Macs for my business.

So what do you have that is "way more powerful than comparable Macs?" I'm interested to know what that would be.

BTW, I've used both systems since 1987. How long is "many years" to you?

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2017 at 06:28 UTC
In reply to:

GarysInSoCal: Sorry... but I'm a freak off the leash. I would have unhooked that model from the school teacher preppy look and brought her over to the wild side with some hairstyle and wardrobe re-adjustments... and shot her with some extreme focal length lenses... something that NONE of these photographers did. Even thou there were slight differences in their styles, all their images looked basically the same... BORRRRRRRING! My 'freak off the leash' style is here: http://www.modelmayhem.com/2623

Gary,

Sorry but I have to agree with the naysayers here. The images on your link are very synthetic and two dimensional. Supremely boring.

Sorry, I suppose there is an audience for such a style down in SoCal, but it is a boutique appeal, at best. BTW, I strongly prefer real boobs ! ; ))

Good luck.

dotyman

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2017 at 06:12 UTC

Will be interesting to see if Manny still feels that way after another 3 months living with all the Windows issues...

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2017 at 21:59 UTC as 304th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

ozturert: 1) Cost
2) Flexibility
3) Abundance of software (though software support for OS has come long way)
4) Cost
5) Flexibility
6) Abundance of...

Windows has been extremely stable for me last 7-8 years so I see no problem on that side. Plus, some PC and laptop makers build beautiful machines now, so Apple's "good" look is less of an advantage now.

Sorry Apple, I liked you but..

What software are you running? If you're only running a few resource intensive apps, then that could be true. However, if you're running 10 or more such apps, sorry, but I don't believe you. I've used both for 30 years and Windows has never been as robust, reliable and stable as Mac OS.

Unless, of course, you enjoy being your own IT department (I don't).

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2017 at 21:57 UTC
In reply to:

Phil Birder: 1) It's a PC
2) It's a PC
3) It's a PC
4) It's a PC
5) It's a PC

:o)

LMAO

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2017 at 21:51 UTC
On article Domke F-803 and F-5XB review (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ultimatumini: I have the F-5XB myself and the velcro lines up fine so I am thinking this might just be on your samples that you experienced this. Can't imagine that would be a mistake they would be ok with during the design process.

I have used the black canvas F-5XB for several years now and the Velcro has never lined up correctly. Only the last 1/4" or so actually mates together.

Not a big deal, but it is a little annoying. I wonder if Domke intended for something (light jacket? the folded shoulder strap?...) to be retained under the flap?

Link | Posted on Jul 5, 2017 at 18:52 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2748 comments in total)
In reply to:

DVT80111: A7R2 sensor is still the king !!!

Nice.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2017 at 03:16 UTC
On article Sony a9 Full Review: Mirrorless Redefined (2748 comments in total)
In reply to:

DVT80111: A7R2 sensor is still the king !!!

You mean LeBron?

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2017 at 03:16 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1909 comments in total)
In reply to:

ttran88: With this announcement tomorrow's DPR throw back Thursday can consist of the D810 & 5DMIV. 🙃

How cute. Perhaps you should wait until someone actually reviews the camera? Oops, I forgot–reality isn't a basis for an opinion for some people.

My bad...

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 06:27 UTC
In reply to:

The Silver Nemesis: Windows 10 / EOS Utility & USB 3.0 bug STILL not fixed. Silly.

Buy a Mac.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2017 at 03:41 UTC
In reply to:

entoman: As usual, a couple of very minor fixes for bugs that very few people ever encounter, but nothing of any real value.

How about increased functionality?

How about 4K crop?

How about increasing the number of functions that can be assigned to buttons/dials via the custom settings?

How about assigning the ability to toggle between bracketing and single shot to the AF lock or AEL buttons?

How about following Nikon by having the ability to tweak metering to personal taste, instead of us all having to set our exposure compensation dials to minus half a stop all the time?

And, it would be rather nice if Canon service centres were able to provide a service to convert the cameras to twin SD cards instead of the silly CF/SD combo we currently have???

How about it Canon?

Don't need any of those features–the camera is good enough just the way it is.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2017 at 03:41 UTC
On article Video: Shooting Dog Portraits with the Sony a6300 (192 comments in total)

Holy cow–does EVERYONE and their DOG have a BLOG???

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2017 at 07:24 UTC as 138th comment
In reply to:

eno2: "the 5D IV can also capture HD and 4K video, at up to 60p. "

They forgot to mention it shots a crappy 720p video resolution wise in a 1080 format, full of moire and aliasing. A 2,5-2,8K resolution wise video in a 4K format with a huge 1,75x crop in UHD, with an ancient and very inefficient codec, which yields enormous files. And on top of everything, the high ISO quality is on par with latest m4/3 cameras that cost 4 tiles less. :)

eno2, I think you need a faster computer and a color managed monitor. You're equipment sounds like it's limiting the quality of the video for you.

As far as your reference to Tony Northrup's video, you must be kidding. The footage at ISO 3200 on the GH4 is FULL of artifacts and noise, and the colors are flat. In addition, the GH4 isn't even a "latest" M4/3 camera. And, finally, I refer you back to the idea that the 5DIV is not intended to be a 4K video camera for the masses. Not sure what you're thinking here...

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 03:02 UTC
On article Have your say: Best midrange ILC of 2016 (53 comments in total)
In reply to:

iamatrix: Really have to say the PenF in this category. It's beautiful, more so than my Leica, and that is saying quite a bit.

The merit is the user experience. True, it is imperfect, but so are so many other cameras (all actually). Again, and maybe you'll try it this time, test one out on your own–the camera is a joy to hold and shoot with. I sold mine for some of the reasons you mention, but I still feel it was a joy to shoot with.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 02:50 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1647 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eugene CH: Time-Lapse: I already wrote to the Dpreview and kindly asked for always including in "Specification" if the camera tested has or not a Time-Lapse! Unfortunately they did not implement this improvement. Why not???? There are already some tested cameras which have Time-Lapse, however not mentioned in Specification! Would you, Dear Colleagues, agree to have this information in each future Test-Specification?

Ahhh, it is an imperfect world, isn't it?

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 02:46 UTC
In reply to:

BobORama: Show me an artist for hire and I will show you someone who compromises their vision.

Show me someone who worries too much about being perceived as pretentious, and I will show you mediocre work.

Link | Posted on Jan 26, 2017 at 02:42 UTC
In reply to:

eno2: "the 5D IV can also capture HD and 4K video, at up to 60p. "

They forgot to mention it shots a crappy 720p video resolution wise in a 1080 format, full of moire and aliasing. A 2,5-2,8K resolution wise video in a 4K format with a huge 1,75x crop in UHD, with an ancient and very inefficient codec, which yields enormous files. And on top of everything, the high ISO quality is on par with latest m4/3 cameras that cost 4 tiles less. :)

I think you hit the nail on the head-Canon does not want you to buy this camera to shoot video. They want you to buy one of their video cameras for that. The 5DIV is designed to give you the ability to shoot reasonable quality jpegs at a high frame rate so you can capture stills in a tight sequence. Get it?

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2017 at 17:04 UTC
In reply to:

eno2: "the 5D IV can also capture HD and 4K video, at up to 60p. "

They forgot to mention it shots a crappy 720p video resolution wise in a 1080 format, full of moire and aliasing. A 2,5-2,8K resolution wise video in a 4K format with a huge 1,75x crop in UHD, with an ancient and very inefficient codec, which yields enormous files. And on top of everything, the high ISO quality is on par with latest m4/3 cameras that cost 4 tiles less. :)

Also, 1080-60p on 5DIV is outstanding. Why shoot at 720?

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2017 at 16:59 UTC
In reply to:

eno2: "the 5D IV can also capture HD and 4K video, at up to 60p. "

They forgot to mention it shots a crappy 720p video resolution wise in a 1080 format, full of moire and aliasing. A 2,5-2,8K resolution wise video in a 4K format with a huge 1,75x crop in UHD, with an ancient and very inefficient codec, which yields enormous files. And on top of everything, the high ISO quality is on par with latest m4/3 cameras that cost 4 tiles less. :)

Hi ISO performance on ANY current MFT camera is No where NEAR this camera. I've tried them all. Be real please!

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2017 at 16:57 UTC
Total: 206, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »