Donald B

Donald B

Lives in Queensland
Works as a carpenter
Joined on May 4, 2010

Comments

Total: 194, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On photo Phantom at Dawn. in the Seven types of aircraft - fighters! challenge (14 comments in total)

Great image well done

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2018 at 10:13 UTC as 2nd comment

That is great, when can we buy ?

Link | Posted on Jun 27, 2018 at 11:10 UTC as 10th comment

very happy with my peak strap , have the v3 connectors on my em52 with no problems so far but only had the strap for a few months. great service.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2018 at 21:45 UTC as 41st comment
In reply to:

MarioV: Awesome photos.. though I feel a bit uneasy because they would needed to have been blasted with light at those narrow apertures and fast enough shutter speeds.

why ? its better to use a slower shutter speed and lower flash power which inturn stills the subject . as the flash fires faster ( 1/2000 sec)

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2018 at 08:53 UTC
In reply to:

Donald B: Was the image worth 40 k before or after the incident ?

to SC . every man and their dog is shooting this kind of image , google it and shes not wearing any makeup if you watch the vid, its PP, if you go to Olympus sight videos, a guy is at a photography convention in the US shooting similar things as a demonstration of using garbage as a prop Ive even done it 10 years ago as well on a shoot.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2018 at 00:17 UTC
In reply to:

Donald B: Was the image worth 40 k before or after the incident ?

"Diy ring light cheap" is the name of the video $50 max it was an experiment.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2018 at 04:14 UTC
In reply to:

Donald B: Was the image worth 40 k before or after the incident ?

Any one could have taken that image. Its just a tight crop of a face . nothing more nothing less. They didnt licence I t because it was the cover of their book and was a head and shoulder shot. They onky stole 1\4 of the image :-)

Link | Posted on May 27, 2018 at 22:33 UTC
In reply to:

Donald B: Was the image worth 40 k before or after the incident ?

I did watch the video, that was the point of the post

Link | Posted on May 27, 2018 at 02:06 UTC

Was the image worth 40 k before or after the incident ?

Link | Posted on May 26, 2018 at 21:32 UTC as 22nd comment | 15 replies

im glad i switched to olympus. this is pentax progress ;-)

Link | Posted on May 18, 2018 at 11:03 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply

I thought you were going to complain about not having duel WB settings :-)

Link | Posted on May 16, 2018 at 01:35 UTC as 19th comment
In reply to:

Rensol: Olympus did the same . was very annoying

doesn't happen on my em52

Link | Posted on May 16, 2018 at 01:32 UTC
In reply to:

GodSpeaks: Can someone explain to me how using this frankenkamera (4/3 sensor, Canon mount, requiring a phone to work) would be BETTER than just carrying a real Canon/Nikon or MFT camera? Sorry, but I just do not get it. Even Sony and Olympus could not get their offering to gain traction.

i was just thinking the same.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2018 at 04:29 UTC
On article Pentax K-1 II Review: A worthy upgrade? (1539 comments in total)
In reply to:

blacklion: RAW noise reduction? Permanent?
Ricoh, you are drunk. Go home.

It's pity, really. I can not afford full-frame, but I'm waiting for K-3 III to replace my old K-5 (first version). Now I'm afraid I better buy K-3 II.

your k5 has it as well

Link | Posted on May 8, 2018 at 10:44 UTC
In reply to:

SteveOttwa: It worries me that DPR may be contemplating major changes to the web site. My advice is, it ain’t broke so don’t fix it. Resist the compulsion to “improve the user experience”... that scourge of software driven businesses that usually results in achieving just the opposite. If you must change some things, make sure that it is based on real statistically significant user feedback, and not some focus group or (worse) some new fangled theory of web site design.

agree, and show the image file size not the image pixel number, as people hesitate in downloading the original thinking its 16meg when in fact its only 2 .

Link | Posted on May 6, 2018 at 22:04 UTC
On article Video: How to pack for a two-month photo expedition (56 comments in total)

after viewing your utbe channel, their is defiantly a life out side the box, good for you, I left work for a five year adventure when I was 27 after building a yacht and never looked back ,their is a better life than money and the poorer I was the better the fun :-) so I did it all over again with an even larger yacht. more fun though with crew M&F and sunshine even though we had some very cold ocean mornings. keep up the good work ;-)

Link | Posted on May 4, 2018 at 07:23 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

Duncan D: I wonder how many pro shoot this type of sports with mirorrless cameras. I'm not implying that they are not capable but truly inquiring. It would be interesting to see.

it's rare to see a pro with a Nikon these days and not a Canon

any camera can spray and pray , mirrorless can do it faster so I guess you would get twice as many keepers :-)

Link | Posted on May 3, 2018 at 05:06 UTC
In reply to:

Michiel953: I stopped reading at “create a new layer”.

me to. I was hoping for an action I could download with presets :-)

Link | Posted on May 3, 2018 at 00:20 UTC
In reply to:

Roland Karlsson: So much misunderstanding in the comments. And such lazy guys. With some practice, what he did is made very fast. Different sharpening of skin and cloth is not too advanced or unnecessary skills.

And, of course, the usual misunderstanding of the word sharp. A sharp lens has nothing to do with a sharpened image. A sharp lens has high resolution. A sharpened image has higher acutance. Resolution and acutance is not the same thing. Resolution is how small details you can resolve. Acutance is the level of amplification of high frequencies in the image. Increasing acutance do not give you more details, it only makes the details higher contrast.

Therefore you cannot get a sharper lens so you do not have to sharpen the image.

when I have my next 800 portraits to process I will send to you :-)

Link | Posted on May 3, 2018 at 00:19 UTC

mistakes are good for click bait :-)

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 UTC as 9th comment
Total: 194, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »