Tonio Loewald

Lives in United States Arlington, VA, United States
Works as a Consultant
Has a website at http://loewald.com/
Joined on Jul 25, 2005

Comments

Total: 295, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

The price is outrageous. Fortunately, there's competition (duet).

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 06:20 UTC as 1st comment
On article Have your say: Best prime lens of 2016 (153 comments in total)
In reply to:

User3787089555: Why not Canon 35 1.4L II on this list???

It came out over a year ago?

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2016 at 15:44 UTC
On article Hands-on and in-depth with the Sony a6500 (553 comments in total)
In reply to:

FodgeandDurn: In a way this camera sums up all that is wrong with the industry in 2016. The specs are lovely, but they don't seem to have thought about the user/ownership experience at all. All around us tech is striving to blend into our lives seamlessly, and here we have another dull ergonomically flawed device with the same old complex work-flows.

When a camera finally arrives where I can shoot in RAW, immediately edit that shot on a high-resolution screen (either on the camera or immediately available on another device a la SnapBridge), and then share to anyone and everyone I want on all the hundreds of platforms we have available to us, then I will be impressed. The most exciting young photographers of today are on Instagram, and why on earth not?

I remember Steve Jobs explaining that the iPod was software. The iPod was great software first, hardware second, although Apple managed to inspire consumers on both levels. The next frontier of digital imaging should be revolutionising UX, not FPS.

@ottok — Apple's concern is security not developer convenience. Anything that lets an app change your network settings is a huge security problem. Again — a wired connection is the answer.

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2016 at 02:06 UTC
On article Hands-on and in-depth with the Sony a6500 (553 comments in total)
In reply to:

FodgeandDurn: In a way this camera sums up all that is wrong with the industry in 2016. The specs are lovely, but they don't seem to have thought about the user/ownership experience at all. All around us tech is striving to blend into our lives seamlessly, and here we have another dull ergonomically flawed device with the same old complex work-flows.

When a camera finally arrives where I can shoot in RAW, immediately edit that shot on a high-resolution screen (either on the camera or immediately available on another device a la SnapBridge), and then share to anyone and everyone I want on all the hundreds of platforms we have available to us, then I will be impressed. The most exciting young photographers of today are on Instagram, and why on earth not?

I remember Steve Jobs explaining that the iPod was software. The iPod was great software first, hardware second, although Apple managed to inspire consumers on both levels. The next frontier of digital imaging should be revolutionising UX, not FPS.

@Richard Butler: I think it's up to the camera makers to figure out how to make this stuff work; they've had a long time to do so.

DxO went with a hard connection to the camera, which is actually very sensible since in many environments (e.g. big sporting events) wireless communication is pretty useless (and will be even more useless as users carry more wireless devices around).

Personally, I think cameras should be sensor + lens/mount modules (with extra physical controls) that your smart phone can slide into like a battery case. A late model smart phone is comparably thick with the tilting screens on many cameras.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2016 at 05:23 UTC
In reply to:

martindpr: Beautiful tones, reminds me of my old bodies - the D2H line except for the slightly cooler blues which IMO need to be a tad bit warmer, like in Canon. The only thing that's missing in the APS-C is a fast normal prime - a cheap and simple design 35mm f/1.2 designed exclusively for Nikon APS-C.

A 35mm f1.2 DX prime would have the same DoF as a 50mm f1.8 FX prime — guess what, Nikon sells one of those (for $200) and it's superb. Exactly what market would the exotic 35 serve?

What I'd like to see is a small, lightweight FX body. There's really no technical reason they can't do one; Hasselblad has just shown off a medium format body that's smaller than Nikon or Canon DX bodies. (Obviously, it would have a thicker body owing to flange distance, but that's just air.)

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2016 at 05:57 UTC
In reply to:

martindpr: Beautiful tones, reminds me of my old bodies - the D2H line except for the slightly cooler blues which IMO need to be a tad bit warmer, like in Canon. The only thing that's missing in the APS-C is a fast normal prime - a cheap and simple design 35mm f/1.2 designed exclusively for Nikon APS-C.

The 35mm 1.8 is very nice, small, cheap, and light. A 35 1.2 would almost certainly not be cheap or light.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 14:42 UTC
In reply to:

Carl Mucks: It's huge for its 0.8x crop factor. It looks ugly. And it's likely behind every professional FF camera in every measurement. What to be fascinated about? -- Ridiculous price?

Fuji must have caught a Zika virus, how else to explain this microcephalic camera?

You can use a camera like this with FF lenses via adapter, and shoot square or FF portrait without tilting the camera.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 14:50 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80 Review (682 comments in total)
In reply to:

bluevellet: Canon M5 not even worthy to be compared to this real camera.

Feritol – Sony has on sensor phase detect on the A6xxx and A7/A7mk ii. Not dissing Canon, just pointing out that "dual pixel" is just branding tech that (ironically) Nikon came out with first (and then of course failed to use in its DSLRs).

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 15:35 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80 Review (682 comments in total)
In reply to:

zzzxtreme: i'm actually happy with these announcements. Digital Camera industry is (still) alive and well !

It's alive, but not well. We're seeing an explosion of offerings in a shrinking market: that's not health, it's desperation.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 15:31 UTC
On article Microsoft Pix aims to capture better people pictures (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: So Microsoft developed this APP for Apple and Apple only, but NOT for Windows' Phone.

It seems Microsoft thought Microsoft's Phone is hopeless, and should be dead.

BTW, all camera makers make remote APP for smartphone. but NOT for windows' phone.

Nikon flashes adjust their color temperature automatically? News to me.

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2016 at 00:26 UTC
In reply to:

ZJ24: Dang, didn't see this coming. Looking forward to seeing user reviews, and good to see Nikon innovating.

It's a shame AF "rattles up" lenses in a couple of years. I must be lucky to have had zero AF lenses do any such thing in fifteen years.

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2016 at 05:37 UTC
On article Zenmuse Z3 is DJI's first aerial zoom camera (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeinBKK: So, how many ways did they break the rules here ?
Did they even have a commercial permit and the required CASA license ?
The permit has a height restriction of around 130m from memory, and the Harbour Bridge is higher than that !
It also requires a 30m pedestrian exclusion zone ...hard to do considering the popularity of this tourist area !
DPreview, are you condoning illegal acts ?

Sorry, I missed part of what you wrote.

All they need is CASA certification, a flight plan, and a permit. Getting the certification is a 5 day course, and if I were a drone maker I'd probably think it worth my while to get some of my people certified. (Oh, and if you're a qualified pilot you may be able to skip the certification.)

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2016 at 18:04 UTC
On article Microsoft Pix aims to capture better people pictures (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike FL: So Microsoft developed this APP for Apple and Apple only, but NOT for Windows' Phone.

It seems Microsoft thought Microsoft's Phone is hopeless, and should be dead.

BTW, all camera makers make remote APP for smartphone. but NOT for windows' phone.

That's a really clever feature and another example of how camera companies need to turn over the software-side of their cameras to Google/Microsoft/Apple — anyone but them (the camera companies). (Apple's introduction of flashes that automatically adjust for lighting is another one in the eye of camera companies, as is the camera app that uses time lapse techniques to filter people out of landscape/architecture shots. The camera makers haven't a hope of keeping up with this and need to open up their systems.

To be fair, Sony is pretty good at software, but lousy as UIs.

Link | Posted on Jul 29, 2016 at 17:53 UTC
On article Zenmuse Z3 is DJI's first aerial zoom camera (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeinBKK: So, how many ways did they break the rules here ?
Did they even have a commercial permit and the required CASA license ?
The permit has a height restriction of around 130m from memory, and the Harbour Bridge is higher than that !
It also requires a 30m pedestrian exclusion zone ...hard to do considering the popularity of this tourist area !
DPreview, are you condoning illegal acts ?

How do you know the photo was even taken from a drone? They may have just bought a stock photo for publicity purposes, the way Samsung advertises its phones with pictures taken using DSLRs, or Intel's famous fly through the chip ads were made on PowerPC Macs.

Second, the photo was taken from WAY up. Assuming a 100 degree field of view for the wide angle and the length of the bridge at 500m, do some math and figure out how high the drone is.

Link | Posted on Jul 17, 2016 at 16:07 UTC
On article Elevating X-Trans? Fujifilm X-T2 Review (2197 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jostian: Can anyone from DPR (or anyone else) comment on the rubber cladding, I had lots of issues with the rear cladding coming loose after only a few months, not what I was expecting from a flagship, does the cladding on the X-T2 seem more robust? mine became 'mushy' quite quick and then proceeded to lift off the body (specifically around the rear thumb rest area). I loved the IQ and ergonomics etc. but the lack of build robustness (or toughness) was an issue for me.

How long is the warranty? I've had rubberized plastic deteriorate so badly on some devices (stored in perfectly reasonable conditions) as to render them unusable, this includes a no-name tripod and my Nikon FM-10.

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2016 at 01:26 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (493 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: This New Standard gets a pretty lame score on DXO...

"and its most trivial use" — actually expose to the left is more versatile than ISO invariance. E.g. because the Nikon D5 is only ISO invariant beyond 800 you can expose to the left based on your knowledge of the sensor. (AFAIK that's what the D5 does for you anyway, i.e. it plays games with sensor output below ISO 800, and beyond that it just shoots at ISO 800, so you lose 1.5 stops of DR at base ISO, but gain 1 stop of DR above ISO800. So you don't need to know any of this, just as long as you ignore the ETTR nutjobs)

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2016 at 06:38 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (493 comments in total)

dpreview's scoring system has to be the dumbest ever. Ratings are relative to "other cameras in the category" and also within the current generation. What category? What generation? Is this camera better or worse than the D750? Or the D610? (Or even the RX10 or whatever other random cameras have comparable ratings?) One of the reasons people like DxO's scores (flawed as they may be) is that a better score is a better score. A lens released two years ago isn't graded on a curve. Personally, I preferred "highly recommended" etc. because it wasn't precise enough to allow you to ignore the review itself.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 17:43 UTC as 59th comment | 1 reply
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (493 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: This New Standard gets a pretty lame score on DXO...

"FOR AN AVERAGE CAMERA" that shoots 12fps with the world's best AF system.

Nikon puts its best sensors in the D5500 and the Df, neither of which are flagship cameras. At the high end, other stuff comes into play.

ISO invariance is, in essence, "expose to the left". It's the latest fad of the same people who were espousing "expose to the right" two years ago.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 17:41 UTC
In reply to:

Thanatham Piriyakarnjanakul: More light loss, bigger, added weight and need to increase ISO or change shutter speed when use teleconverter that very great idea. face palm.

You do realize you can still stick this on a crop sensor camera. It's not like Nikon sells any serious DX format telephoto lenses (the most reach you can get is 300mm). The only thing this has over Nikon is the built-in 1.4x extender. Nikon's is an add-on extra.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 17:31 UTC
On article Virtual Reality: It's not just for gamers anymore (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artak Hambarian: Current VR combining two challanges:
1. 3D, which faces non existance of good high res viewers, and I, as a photographer, care about this the most - I have been in stereophotography more than 30 years. I have done really stunning (for at least me and my friends and family) 3d macro and architectural shots that one can view over and over...
2. Interractive immersion via turning your head or by directing your sight. This is an entirely different beast, that in my opinion has some specific applications. I can see guided movies here.
I think these tasks should target different markets and shall be solved separately. E.g. the first task is relatively easy to solve by creating a 3d (stereo) digital viewer with really high resolution, e.g. 4-8 mp for each eye.
Later the audio related issues should be solved. BTW, its hard to see how could binocular effect be seemless when turning one's head.
I am waiting for the good 3d stills viewer, and not so much for the "interactive" experience.

We'll have to wait and see how well it works, but Facebook is claiming to have addressed VR in stereo with their open source pipeline:

https://code.facebook.com/posts/1755691291326688/introducing-facebook-surround-360-an-open-high-quality-3d-360-video-capture-system/

Lytro's far more complete solution does not appear to handle stereo.

Resolution is probably the easiest problem to solve, but it will require another generational improvement in both display and GPU technology (4K60 is pretty difficult right now and barely sufficient).

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 18:22 UTC
Total: 295, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »