bluevellet

Do you have any prior investment in m43? Anything in other camera systems? No? Then you can really start anew. You are right to focus on weather sealing in a place like Iceland though your prime ...

Huge is relative. The 600mm has the same diameter but adds 5 centimeter in length. But it's over 300 grams lighter though which is like removing a whole Olympus 75mm f1.8 in terms of weight ...

You mean there are no FF equivalent of such a lens? Hello, the Canon RF 600mm F11 and the RF 800mm F11? Lenses that would have been bonkers only 5 years ago, but we live in different times now and ...

Instead of shooting at f1.4, you'll shoot at f4-7.1 because you know you'll can clean up the extra noise. By doing that, you are reducing the weight of your FF gear without switching to a smaller ...

Include the RAW files as well!

But the 24-200 looks like it is making a case versus the 24-70 f4

Without reading the article, I can answer the question: yes.

If it's like the z6 mark 1, the AWB is often off so some post work necessary.

I had the same problem with the old d600.

If it is complementing your E-M1 mark III, what is the R6 doing that the E-M1 isn't? And vice versa? Both cameras are 20MP and shoot fast. :)

The 14mm is a fun lens, great colors but it's not really much better than a kit lens otherwise. The Canon 22mm is more like the Canon equivalent of the Lumix 20mm f1.7. Add to that that the G85 ...

The 20mm is a classic. And it is small. Though it has several limitations (slow AF, C-AF often not supported, not weather-sealed, manual focus by wire). I use it all the time on my GM1 because it ...

(1) Max high ISO is capped at 6400. Anything higher is the in-camera extended high ISO range and it's not good. Better raise exposure values in post for better results

See title :)

Who was asking for a review of this? :)

No, she'll host DPReview TV in 2035.

Why not... go on Ebay, track down a Lumix GM5 (2014) with kit zoom with maybe a smallish prime like the Lumix 20mm f1.7 or the 45mm f1.8. You'd only need a couple of hundred bucks for this and ...

Good but no 4K60. 4K is capped at 30 fps. Less options to grade and stuff too. But footage looks great out-of-camera. Reasonable. But if you use a cheap body as a quick springboard to buying ...

1. G9 is a beast of a camera in the m43 world. If you want to lighten the load going from the FF, you can downsize a lot more than that venturing into m43. 2. You might be disappointed with AF, at ...

The only downside is Calgary is mostly grey. A review in the summertime or with fall colors would have been better.

Goes both ways.

The review is about the camera, so you'd want good lenses to show off what the camera can do. The little kit lens is neat but not exactly sharp.

They could have gone all out and...