Henry McA

If it was for L mount, it would cost double that und it would be double the size and weight, at least.

As if you couldn´t print m43 images large :D

He wrote that image quality is not his priority.

@Gary Martin: That´s what she said.

@iamraz Really? I thought Hans & Heidi in Wetzlar Germany would have created this lens over beer and Schnitzel and that is why it´s so expensive.

Is this one new? I feel like the E-M10 IV is fairly old, but I could be mistaken.

@ DarkShift

That explanation makes sense, although it makes the comparison tool (under conclusion of the review) useless.

I don´t know either camera, just referred to the comparison tool and saw that the a7R IV seems to be "better".

The Sony a7R IV is better in almost every aspect and was released 1.5 years ago. Nikon you are trailing behind...

Yes, and I developed telekinetic powers over night. Must have been the sun activity...

Why not use large format? Then you got enough time to train the birds to sit still.

Shooting Birds with medium format... maybe I´m old but...

It´s not a sports cam.

I own the old version of the 10-24 and the Rokinon 12mm. It´s no contest, the Fuji is tack sharp at all apertures compared to the Rokinon wich has low contrast and is softer. My old copy of the...

Looks really good, sharp, great colours and some magic but why this aggressive image processing? Even shots at iso 100 show some noise.

Great image quality, the lens seems to be superb.

If you don´t see the sharpness, lack of fringing and distortion than you must be blind.

I have to say that seeing such image quality coming out of a mft sensor is quite "wow. Very sharp lens. I´d buy it in a second if I had personnel to lug it around.

Looks promising.

A very niche lens. Fuji should have made a 33mm 1.2 or an updated 1.4.