Henry McA

There are places on the interwebs for such things, you moron.

He is a photographer, of course he looks at pictures of "scantily clad" women - it´s his job. For someone from outside the university it is understandable to react to these "entitled save space...

Millennial crap.

It´s slow and not a tilt-shift lens and it is not made by a premium brand like Leica or Zeiss. 2500 € is overpriced for what it is and it´s not even "medium" format.

Yes, I looked at the images and they are incredibly underwhelming. I see distortion, noise even at middle iso values and washed out colours. What´s it about that makes people believe that "MF"...

So, 800 - 1000 $ would be a realistic price.

Every ordinary DSLR has "live view" with exactly the same sharpness accuracy of your beloved Sony crapcam.

Images look fantastic unless you brighten the shadows - the look reminds me of the old sensor generations like 5D and 5D Mark II.

Brilliant!

That would be quite suicidal.

If it´s FF I´d buy it, otherwise not - there already are very good offerings with smaller sensors from competitors (that have a full lens lineup).

The old one cost half as much and was quite good - af was fast enough and silent. Don´t see the point of that new version.

I wouldn´t want to use one. But I used the DP2 Merrill and that one was not bad at base iso.

But this SD Quattro is grainy even at base iso and details look not natural - it looks like a digital...

77 % really? This is a niche camera without any real advantages over it´s competition but many deal breakers. I´d give it no more than 55 - 65 %.

Me too, I just use a normal backpack with some smaller padded pouches inside. Much more practical on trips.

Now think about how Sony would handle this ;)

Fuji has the same problem...

Looks impressively sharp maybe even sharper than the Canon 16-35mm 2.8 Mark III. I still don´t like the Sony jpeg colours though.

The images of my old Panasonic FZ5 looked way better at base iso. Less artefacts, sharper, better colour. This camera is useless.

Their lack of innovation is mind boggling. Unless you NEEED 8fps and faster AF, the 7200 is still the better camera.