photofan1986

photofan1986

Lives in Belgium Belgium
Works as a Teacher
Joined on Apr 6, 2009

Comments

Total: 368, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Mr Bolton: This is a really pretty camera and it seems to take great pictures.. but what will this do for me at most of seven grand that a weather sealed, AF and video capable Fuji X Pro 2 for two grand will not?

I mean, besides have a red dot on the logo.

Well, there is the red dot and.... Oh wait, my bad !

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2017 at 23:09 UTC

Yes, the Sony is more expensive, but the lens on this thing is in a league of its own!

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 18:15 UTC as 42nd comment
On article Got focal range? Canon 24-105mm F4L II sample gallery (88 comments in total)

I think I am seeing some pictures among the chromatic aberration.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2017 at 11:24 UTC as 27th comment
In reply to:

mmarian: What I find most disappointing in situation like this is the utter disregard for a common sense and even more so for basic intelligence of readers and consumers. And even sadder is that they probably pay big money to the spin doctors who try to tell us with a straight face that water is not wet. But than again I am not even surprised anymore...

Is it any different in politics ?

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2017 at 23:00 UTC

Canon still doesn't have in camera CA correction for jpegs?

Edit: nevermind, those are edited raw files.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2017 at 14:48 UTC as 34th comment
On article CES 2017: hands-on with the Canon PowerShot G9 X II (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

willemd nl: I have the G9X Mk1. I love it, but this is a good upgrade, because it fixes the original's major flaw: it takes like 2 or 3 seconds to shoot single RAW photos.

For me, all comparisons with the Sony RX100 series are irrelevant. The Canon fits in my regular jeans pockets, which the Sonys do not.

No wonder then why people complain about lens error 99.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 17:48 UTC
On article CES 2017: hands-on with the Canon PowerShot G9 X II (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

princecody: Better than Panasonic LX10?

Hum, no.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 17:45 UTC
On article CES 2017: hands-on with the Canon PowerShot G9 X II (193 comments in total)
In reply to:

willemd nl: I have the G9X Mk1. I love it, but this is a good upgrade, because it fixes the original's major flaw: it takes like 2 or 3 seconds to shoot single RAW photos.

For me, all comparisons with the Sony RX100 series are irrelevant. The Canon fits in my regular jeans pockets, which the Sonys do not.

So you really put a +500$ camera in a jeans pocket without any protection?

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2017 at 12:56 UTC
On article CES 2017: Hands-on with Nikon D5600 (321 comments in total)
In reply to:

DamianFI: A mildness evolution to an already great camera, good to see Nikon haven't changed too much.

That's for sure, if you don't like change, Canon and Nikon are the way to go.

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2017 at 10:06 UTC
On article Fujifilm unveils 'Graphite' X-Pro2 and X-T2 (194 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeno: Any "hidden" differences comparing with the regular version?

Well, this is one is quite a bit more expensive...

Link | Posted on Jan 5, 2017 at 08:46 UTC
In reply to:

DPRevievver: let's compare RX 100 (2012) vs G9x2 (2017)
28-100mm vs 28-84mm
F1.8 - 4.9 vs F2.0-4.9
10FPS vs 8FPS

And IQ is better on the Sony, too, imo.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2017 at 14:28 UTC

Though it's not stated at what aperture diffraction starts.

Link | Posted on Dec 24, 2016 at 08:21 UTC as 35th comment
On article Gear of the Year 2016 - Barney's choice: Nikon D500 (216 comments in total)

I stopped using DSLR a while ago, but this seems like a legitimate solution for sports and action photography. Great camera.

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2016 at 16:37 UTC as 24th comment

Is that the Yongnuo lens ?😁

Link | Posted on Dec 16, 2016 at 20:39 UTC as 69th comment
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1293 comments in total)

Could Dpreview reshoot the studio scene with the original E-M1, as they acknowledged that the camera suffered from shutter shock ? This would be very useful for further comparison.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2016 at 17:39 UTC as 82nd comment
On article Woof! Sony a6500 sample images are here (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wu Jiaqiu: nice to see some shots where the AF system is tested.........not quite as hectic as Icelandic ponies though.........

You should see those ponies! :D

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2016 at 19:30 UTC
On article Woof! Sony a6500 sample images are here (364 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wu Jiaqiu: nice to see some shots where the AF system is tested.........not quite as hectic as Icelandic ponies though.........

You really do hate Olympus with a vengeance, don't you?

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2016 at 19:22 UTC
On article Vivo Xplay6 features 4-axis stabilized 12MP dual-cam (33 comments in total)
In reply to:

barrym1966: just a question, but why dont sony/nikon kill this little camera revolution before it takes off?

How hard is it do build a phone into a DSLR body? :) would even give youa touch screen too :D

Lol I would like to see people use a DSLR to make a phone call. THAT would be funny.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2016 at 10:05 UTC
In reply to:

Fujica: OK, Olympus did not keep their promise.
Its not better then APS-C as they said it would be.

Shame on you Olympus for not keeping word and for misleading your customers.

They said it would be better as a whole package, not on IQ.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2016 at 17:49 UTC
In reply to:

Mateus1: Where are all m1mk2 fanboys who claimed m1mk2 competes with Fuji/Sony APS-C in IQ? The RAW diference is significant, even Fuji X-E2s with less MP is better. I will say what I said before: no m4/3 camera is worth $2000 in 2017 with such emazing offer in APS-C and FF for much lees money. Actually I would never pay for any m4/3 more then $1300 when best APS-C with same body size costs $1300-1600, and also with a few great FF for $1500-1900. Period.

Good for you.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2016 at 16:35 UTC
Total: 368, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »