meanwhile

meanwhile

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Nov 14, 2009

Comments

Total: 714, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
In reply to:

D500 001: To me this image fits more to abstract than travel. Quite similar to a work by Barnett Newman:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_art#/media/File:Newman-Onement_1.jpg

So he's evoked the essence of abstract art, while taking a travel shot. You say it like it's a bad thing.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 00:40 UTC
In reply to:

Biological_Viewfinder: I hate, abhor, detest, despise, that someone who was not even holding a camera and instead used a noisy, annoying, toy to take a picture and won a bunch of money.

Other people did their best, got on their knees in the muck, took bracketed shots to later blend so the dynamic range was there, and did their level best to portray the scene; and got beat by someone who artificially flew above the ground. Not even in a plane or helicopter, he just plain cheated; and still won.

I hate drones! HATE is too small and quiet of a word to describe my unbridled, uncontained absolute rage and malice I feel toward the drones and everyone associated with them.

Everytime I see one, I see some *$(@)*$&@ that is so selfish that he does not care if his loud, obnoxious, annoying, bee-buzzing ruins the experience someone else is having on their walk, hike, camping trip, or their attempts at photography with all the oppressive distraction of some toy model making noise.

"No one was ever too loud reading a book."

Then you are reading the wrong books. Plenty of times I've been shushed in the quiet carriage when laughing out loud reading a book.

I don't think it's drones, or jet skis, or noise, you have an issue with. I think it may be other people having fun. Could be wrong. *shrug*

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 00:39 UTC
In reply to:

Biological_Viewfinder: I hate, abhor, detest, despise, that someone who was not even holding a camera and instead used a noisy, annoying, toy to take a picture and won a bunch of money.

Other people did their best, got on their knees in the muck, took bracketed shots to later blend so the dynamic range was there, and did their level best to portray the scene; and got beat by someone who artificially flew above the ground. Not even in a plane or helicopter, he just plain cheated; and still won.

I hate drones! HATE is too small and quiet of a word to describe my unbridled, uncontained absolute rage and malice I feel toward the drones and everyone associated with them.

Everytime I see one, I see some *$(@)*$&@ that is so selfish that he does not care if his loud, obnoxious, annoying, bee-buzzing ruins the experience someone else is having on their walk, hike, camping trip, or their attempts at photography with all the oppressive distraction of some toy model making noise.

What did you think of the photo itself?

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2016 at 22:53 UTC
In reply to:

Mark Turney: I don't really get this continual need to simulate something old. If you want that look and feel, shoot with film (negative or slide). Please .... let's move forward with making THIS digital "medium" as good as it can be.

" It's fake nostalgia, it has no soul"

I'm betting there is something in your life that you praise that is an analog version of something where there is a newer alternative but you prefer the old.

Whether it's furniture, or jewellery, or vinyl, or cars, or machines, or blenders, or stamps, or whatever. There will be something where you say "They just don't make them like they used to" and pine for the good old days, when objectively the newer versions are really better.

So what?

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2016 at 12:28 UTC
In reply to:

Mark Turney: I don't really get this continual need to simulate something old. If you want that look and feel, shoot with film (negative or slide). Please .... let's move forward with making THIS digital "medium" as good as it can be.

" It's fake nostalgia, it has no soul"

If that's what it is to you, then don't use it. That doesn't make it so for everyone.

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2016 at 12:24 UTC
In reply to:

Mark Turney: I don't really get this continual need to simulate something old. If you want that look and feel, shoot with film (negative or slide). Please .... let's move forward with making THIS digital "medium" as good as it can be.

It's about making it more human.

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2016 at 21:48 UTC
In reply to:

Neez: This would be good for people using a new macbook pro, which doesn't have an SD slot.

It can still use SD-cards.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 00:48 UTC

Could you put it in one of those ziplock, waterproof cases without causing any network issues? This product seems to be one crying out to be 'ruggedized'.

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 00:38 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies

If it was to make it waterproof, that would have been a worthy tradeoff, but Phil's explanation is pretty much "just because, hey".

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2016 at 02:02 UTC as 69th comment

I'd love to see a version of this lens for Sony E-mount.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2016 at 13:07 UTC as 23rd comment
On article Teardown reveals Sony image sensors in iPhone 7 (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

rfsIII: If Sony is the Kodak of image sensor makers (because they seem to produce the majority) then who is the Agfa? Or the Fuji or the GAF or the Ilford or the Bergger or the Adox?
Why do I care? I'd like to be able to pick my phone based on sensor characteristics, rather than brand. Apple phones make nice images and all, but they feel a little too nice...

Fujifilm are the Ilford.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2016 at 08:55 UTC
In reply to:

Nigel Tafferham: Too bad no 'forced euthanasia' for the mentally challenged such as these twits or at least dragging by testicle appendage on an asphalt highway at 100mph !!

Incredible acts - but then there is the 'Trump' !

"What if the vandals are women ?"

It's an interesting question. What chance do you think it was?

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 04:51 UTC
In reply to:

iae aa eia: This thingie looks noice!

Noice and thingie are Australian English.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 12:18 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: This camera takes the guts of the 7rII and 77II and makes for a complete package...too bad other makers (other than Panasonic) are not pushing the envelope.

Yes, good points MrCentrist and Interestingness. Isn't it weird how you agree? I'd guess that even your IP address is the same.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 15:48 UTC
In reply to:

Krich13: OK, I am not sure I’m getting this straight.
A lens almost a stop _slower_ than Batis 85, _without_ autofocus, _without_ IS weighs 100 grams MORE than Batis? And costs $100 more too? Is it a joke?

One is mainly plastic and will last 20 years. The other is mainly metal and will last 100.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 01:02 UTC
In reply to:

AshMills: I think its a shame this lens is not f2 at least, particularly bearing in mind it's weight. I'm sure it is gorgeous, but there is nothing worst than framing up and wishing you had a bit more light - especially without IS to fall back on.. I nearly bought the Batis till I saw the LED screen on the top that you cant read unless you look down on it, and will require a bit of tape over on some occasions..

"No I can see why they made it 2.4, all I said was that its a shame. I had the Nikon AI primes that mostly matched nicely so I appreciate the idea."

Speaking of the Nikkors, it would have been great if it was this size and a 105/2.4.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 01:00 UTC
In reply to:

AshMills: I think its a shame this lens is not f2 at least, particularly bearing in mind it's weight. I'm sure it is gorgeous, but there is nothing worst than framing up and wishing you had a bit more light - especially without IS to fall back on.. I nearly bought the Batis till I saw the LED screen on the top that you cant read unless you look down on it, and will require a bit of tape over on some occasions..

"especially without IS to fall back on"

Get an A7 II, A7S II or A7rII and you have IS to fall back on.

(see that was already covered, sorry)

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 00:58 UTC
In reply to:

meanwhile: Nice. Hopefully more competition like this will force Sony to add touch-to-focus as well, eventually.

If this doesn't raise their eyebrows then they are looking at the wrong thing.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 00:29 UTC

Nice. Hopefully more competition like this will force Sony to add touch-to-focus as well, eventually.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 09:42 UTC as 58th comment | 4 replies
On article ESPN publishes iPhone 7 Plus photos from US Open (340 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mister Roboto: More marketing BS as always. Anybody with $50 P&S camera + courtside game ticket or access to these POV will be able to produce better if not similar results.

Which paragraph said it had a decent grip and longer than 56mm equivalent?

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2016 at 13:33 UTC
Total: 714, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »