TittyTwister

Take pictures. Amazing lens. No need to test it.

If you want to exchange until having a good copy, it s las vegas. Many bad copies have been returned and are ready to ship again "as new". With this return policies you always end up having the ...

I agree. The 70-300 has advantages and the AF is very decent. I prefer it over the sigma 100-400. Much much smaler in the bag. When going for reach 400 is not enough anyway and I use the 200-600.

Been there. Done that... nowdays, 3rd parties can be great alternatives, with decent build quality. Take tamron lenses. Sony has a major stack in it. And so they benefit top tech like sony s linear AF.

My 70-300 is sharper than yours...

The 28-200 is good up to 100mm. At 200mm the images are soft. The real benefit is the 2.8 at 28. Now, compared to the 24-105, the 28-200 is as good or even better in the same range. Problem is ...

I would skip it and get the tamron 28-75.

I use the peak design. It is really the best when you want to customize your transport. The lens is light and without the hood, you can easily transport it in any backpack attached to the body. You ...

I am still using mine from 2015 for landscape and there is no difference in IQ with the r3. It is loud and there is no ibis, but it works wonderfully and the DR is the same as the R3. Regarding the ...

One important thing to note is the weather sealing of tamron lenses that is very good. I use the 28-75 is terrible situations ( bloody fishing, mines, summer farm ) and at the end of the day or 2, ...

Clean the contact and do it the old way. Shake it hard. Sometimes it settles some components back in place. Also, some little "light" shocks on a towel on a table did the trick for me for some ...

Thanks for the tour !

I use the tamron 28-75 in very difficult situations (like winter boat fishing...) where you know the lens will be covered in gunk and blood or in very dusty environments (plants, mines...). I dont ...

Sony have the next gen sensors already. The problem is not the sensor but the processing bandwide with the memory. Sure, a good trick is to use a huge buffer, but at the end, 20 fps @ 50mpx means a ...

I did not find the GM pleasant to use nore better than the 1.8. The sigma is probably the best today s option.

Tried it years ago. I bought the 70 300 that is much consistent. The AF is terrible. I am into sony dince A7R. Have a dozen lenses and have tried many. The 24-240 is thr worst. The tamron 28-200 ...

This is typicaly due from a mounted filter. Some are thinner than others.

If you feel the 70 - 300 is alrezdy hezvy, forget about the 24 70 gm. The 135 is awsome but very narrow usage. The 24-105 is a nice choise but I would take the tamron 28-200 as you are fully ...

Switch to af-c

A 8k video is completely irrelevant exept for fews. The A9 serie is for fast action. If sony makes a hi res A9R it might be competing against the A7R4. With 61mpx, the A7R4 is slower than the A9 ...