xpatUSA

Here y'are: Posted at 1/16 MP :-D

OK thanks, Tom. Amen to that ...

While sounding like a broken record, it might be instructive to compare am image from a shaded scene because most DNG WB's are interpolated/extrapolated from Daylight and Incandescent lighting by ...

Right-ish, Scott, but different part numbers . Physicall y interchangeable but with slightly different transmission spectra ... not enough to be significant for non-pedants. I tried SD14 and SD15 ...

No problem Mike, Today I'm basking in a hi-speed connection for the very few days before the Wife uses it all up on You-Tube ... ;-) That it does and the good alignment helps tremendously ...

I assure you there was not. Yes, the hue changing function in RawTherapee is not perfect and is quite peculiar to use. Maybe I'll try the GIMP and see what it can do. (I don't use Adobe products). ...

So, Larry, in many ways, the comparison is not just X3F vs DNG but quite a bit more as indeed implied in the OP by "Both were processed to get the best results." In view of the above, I've ...

Converted by LifePixel ... still works. ;-) Bought a cheap Chinese 720nm filter to play with. I have to say that shooting IR with a mirror-less is a dream compared to a Sigma DSLR! 2500K WB, no ...

http://www.barrypearson.co.uk/articles/dng/linear.htm#what

Perhaps because DNGs from Foveon raws are Linear DNGs which are different than "normal" DNGs.

By coincidence, my first post in this forum years ago was after following those very same instructions for a newly-acquired SD9. No data transfer whatsoever. Solution was ... guess what ... So, ...

Yes Tom, although I am a little surprised at the question: FastStone Viewer. XnView. PhotoMechanic. DCraw (command-line app). RawTherapee (color not good - needs a .dcp or a .pp3). All tried on my ...

LOL No thanks - I'll be sticking with the GIMP and RawTherapee ...

With the question remaining unanswered and the link presumably not understood and now that we know that the focus was on the white building: The aperture diameter was 16.6/9 = about 2mm. ...

:-| My computer remains totally Adobe-free ... :-D

After slimming down my Sigma stuff, I ended up with a Sigma 24-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF that I never use because I still have the 17-50mm with OS. This 24-70mm is NOT the big one with the 82mm ...