aris14

aris14

Lives in Greece Athens, Greece
Joined on Jan 3, 2005

Comments

Total: 563, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article 2016 Roundup: $1200-2000 ILCs part 1 - Crop-Sensor (188 comments in total)

Facts are facts for these two small beasts. Both of them can perform one thing only. To deliver the way the guys who paid for them. So simple.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 09:37 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

aris14: System becomes better. System is overpriced. No big problem for pros.

You will not find any images. Photogs shooting in the grid are usually not the same guys shooting the race. Their work will contribute along with the other guys work usually in luxurious company editions or coffee table books. They are both pros not amateurs and can hardly care if you can see/find their work.

Link | Posted on Jun 9, 2016 at 09:27 UTC
On article Mosh pits and sunsets: Shooting with the Panasonic GX85 (146 comments in total)

Handy, smart, delivering, affordable all rounder workhorse.
A cam that you 'd love to have no matter what you like or own.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2016 at 07:26 UTC as 8th comment

System becomes better. System is overpriced. No big problem for pros.

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2016 at 07:28 UTC as 7th comment | 8 replies
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (496 comments in total)

Ι think that the most important in this cam it is its naming; D5...

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2016 at 15:36 UTC as 62nd comment
On article Pentax K-1 Pixel Shift: An update (96 comments in total)

DPR reacted properly. There is a first time for everything.
I' d like to point out that the comments of readers had nothing to do with whatever result may derived. I also would like to point out that this is remarkable comparing to a great number of threads in which we usually read some "hardliners" fan comments.

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2016 at 08:16 UTC as 17th comment
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)

The title of the article following the "Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition" is rather insinuating that "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark"...
I guess that more will follow in this pattern/point of view/aspect.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 08:29 UTC as 49th comment | 1 reply
On article Waterfails: We test Pentax K-1's Pixel Shift (225 comments in total)

I think that the point here is whether someone uses ACR or SilkyPix or whatever sw a manufacturer provides along with the product.
PS may well be the standard to retouch/touch up an image in nowadays rather than what it was some 10 years ago when the whole workflow of processing an image was entirely based on it.
Even in those days some "gad" guys had found out that some other RAW converters produced better results than ACR in numerous cases, I think that this was the main reason Adobe introduced LR.
Apart any results, poor or great, delivered from ACR, I really doubt the reason why ACR was used in this case, given the fact that cannot fully support cam's RAW files parameters.
More over it's rather dubious the selection of the scene shot in order to show whatever results. It' s like driving a car in ECO shifting gear change and complaining that you have 25% lower response in acceleration. Oh dear..!

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2016 at 08:21 UTC as 51st comment
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (483 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jon Stern: DPReview destroyed by writers feeling that it's necessary to create clickbait headlines.

It's not bad journalism. It is influenced journalism. Subconsciously. No matter the source of its origin, in this case it is irrelevant.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 01:51 UTC
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (483 comments in total)
In reply to:

Grig: I don't see destruction compared to FZ1000... Sorry... May be good idea to change it to "outperforms" or something like it if you really think so, but not destroys for sure... But to me FZ Leica lens is sharper and less CA... Especially on the sides at F8 at 400mm

C'mon, it's mot just a title, it's a low bread attitude approach that even between candidates mud "exchange" would be avoided.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 01:37 UTC
On article Lens shootout: Sony RX10 III destroys the competition (483 comments in total)

Too much ado for practically nothing. I don't include Canon which doesn't care about the segment as long its logo serves well.
Considering the pricing of RX III and FZ 1000, I say it's like preferring one $30.000 system to another because of an extra strap and cloth for cleaning lenses.
Mercy!

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 01:30 UTC as 105th comment | 1 reply

Back to the days of PS 2.5 when we considered great innovation the adding of a couple filters... Useful for an easy touch, but serious guys would use it as a starting point because in most cases the result will shout that's fake.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 01:17 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Frank in Bridgewater: People who make decisions on the quality, or otherwise, of lenses, cameras, based on sample internet galleries and talk about 12 or 14 or 16 bit color and stuff seem to forget that what you are seeing in a browser are 8 bit jpegs displayed at (probably) 72 dpi (or less).

Well, I am not the Superman, I guess...

Link | Posted on May 23, 2016 at 06:42 UTC

Well, at least the opinions of non Canicon et such people, are rather more interesting yet a little boring sometimes, but they are opinions of people who know photography.
More subjects like these DPR....

Link | Posted on May 20, 2016 at 23:55 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

Frank in Bridgewater: People who make decisions on the quality, or otherwise, of lenses, cameras, based on sample internet galleries and talk about 12 or 14 or 16 bit color and stuff seem to forget that what you are seeing in a browser are 8 bit jpegs displayed at (probably) 72 dpi (or less).

All these are just right and smart. Mind you that a human eye van reach separating/seeing some 10,000 "colours" in a rather selective/relevant way...

Link | Posted on May 20, 2016 at 23:47 UTC
In reply to:

aris14: Is this some kind of innovation?

Ohhh dear..!

Link | Posted on May 20, 2016 at 08:25 UTC

Is this some kind of innovation?

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 08:59 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

aris14: Three top of their line cams each one aiming in 3 different niche of users. Given what they offer more compared to existing rivals I say that Pentax has a clean advantage overall mainly due its price and specs .

Comprehensive menus are responsible for at least the one fourth of sales of every camera. Like it or not, dear manufacturers, sad but true!

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 08:39 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1983 comments in total)
In reply to:

aris14: We all know that this cam is great practically in every aspect.
DPR guys please have in mind that if you chose to publish a review, the posting has to be done at most after 3 months after you get the cam in your hands. Lack of personnel is a serious issue, as important and serious as your readers are.

To Barney Britton :
That brings me to the conclusion that there is a lack of know how in content production work flow management. A rather difficult issue for all editorial organizations involving more than only 5 people.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 08:34 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1983 comments in total)

We all know that this cam is great practically in every aspect.
DPR guys please have in mind that if you chose to publish a review, the posting has to be done at most after 3 months after you get the cam in your hands. Lack of personnel is a serious issue, as important and serious as your readers are.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2016 at 08:59 UTC as 91st comment | 5 replies
Total: 563, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »