aris14

aris14

Lives in Greece Athens, Greece
Joined on Jan 3, 2005

Comments

Total: 577, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Comparison Review: Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA vs 55mm F1.8 ZA (241 comments in total)

High precision exercises to justify the obvious: Different glasses aiming at different purposes even at a slightly different niche.
Given that both lenses are to be used for high end photography sometimes I think that post processing can deliver desired results at a fragment of cost and no one will ever notice.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2016 at 08:33 UTC as 36th comment
In reply to:

AshMills: Equivalence police- that's 16-32mm f1.6-2.4 and 30-60mm 1.6-2.4 to you.

Make up your mind with these numbers or else I won't buy any of those lenses...

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2016 at 09:34 UTC
In reply to:

odpisan: For that price I can buy Pentax 645 Z with best lenses.

I think that quality of photos wouldn't be worth mentioning.

One apple plus one monkey don't sum up two pineapples...

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2016 at 09:30 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 versus X-T2: Seven key differences (362 comments in total)

In the most popular section of comments there is only one that followed from other comments. All others are answers to indifferent comments.

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2016 at 09:39 UTC as 21st comment
On article Sony Planar T* FE 50mm F1.4 ZA Sample Gallery (269 comments in total)

No matter how good this glass is, and it is as I can see, overpricing has its limits.
Btw does anyone knows if Sony has the Minolta's R&D team in lens design?

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2016 at 10:56 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2652 comments in total)

Most people comments are looking at the tree and they cannot see the forest.
As they always do...

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 10:50 UTC as 130th comment
In reply to:

Miron09: for portrait I prefer MFT because bigger sensors reveal too much unwanted detail. like pimples. So unless you have a make up artist by your side, better stay away from MF/FF

They sure do, buy one, it's a collectors item...

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 08:25 UTC

A picture has to be untouched only for reporting and documentary purposes, apart minor enhancement touches aiming to "clear out" the subject (brightness, contrast, saturation, some cast removal perhaps and minor selective touch if needed).

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:29 UTC as 8th comment

This camera is beautiful because this camera is right.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:20 UTC as 34th comment
In reply to:

Loro Husk: The amount of detail is amazing, maybe even too much! At 100% you can see every inperfection...

Worse comment than women's seeing their image in 1:1 magnification in monitors.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:16 UTC
In reply to:

Miron09: for portrait I prefer MFT because bigger sensors reveal too much unwanted detail. like pimples. So unless you have a make up artist by your side, better stay away from MF/FF

Care about a Minolta D-image delivering 1,1 Mp files..?

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:11 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2652 comments in total)
In reply to:

Everlast66: SMC Pentax-FA 77mm F1.8 Limited back in action

http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-FA-77mm-F1.8-Limited-Lens.html

SMC Pentax-FA 31mm F1.8 AL Limited back in action

http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-FA-31mm-F1.8-Limited-Lens.html

Μy SMC 50mm, f1.4 is getting ready too... Back from 1979 and in excellent condition...

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 13:57 UTC
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2652 comments in total)

K-1, as all cameras, is aiming to a niche of photogs who will purchase it for their needs and maybe their likes. Every manufacturer delivers better or worse in some fields for various reasons differently perceived from the audience.
In K-1's case the cam is a beast delivering top IQ, first class building quality, more than welcomed extra features in use, handling, performance and function fields with all its cons found in its software algorithms meaning that there is the chance to improve through updates, irrelevant if Pentax will do it or not.
Its cost is affordable and to my opinion is seriously exposing the overpricing of the competition in some cases.
Great job, great cam...

Link | Posted on Jul 6, 2016 at 10:03 UTC as 303rd comment
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (811 comments in total)
In reply to:

StevenE: This thing is barely medium format. The sensor is only 22% wider than full frame.
For perspective, full frame is 62% wider than APS-C, and more than 100% as wider than MFT sensors.
Previous Hasselblads were 50% wider than full frame

DPR readers can count , that's sure...
And they ' re proud they do...

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2016 at 22:30 UTC
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (811 comments in total)
In reply to:

rsf3127: No post asking for a pancake 0.95f prime lens or a 10-300mm 1.8f zoom so far. Weird...

F .95? That's not a pancake, it's a pizza...

Link | Posted on Jul 4, 2016 at 22:28 UTC
On article Pentax K-1 real-world sample gallery (143 comments in total)

Pentax K-1 is undoubtedly one of the six top FF cams no matter the context field of needs to be covered. It is a great tool for numerous pros and serious amateurs/lovers of photography. Great price too. More than well done. Bravo!

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2016 at 09:51 UTC as 29th comment
On article Fotodiox releases new LED studio-in-a-box (49 comments in total)

Quite useful for SOHO business and in some cases even for pros. There are some more flexible implementations out there, this seems to reach a good score in terms of portability/result cost ratio.

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2016 at 07:52 UTC as 10th comment
On article The price is right: Canon EOS Rebel T6 / 1300D Review (417 comments in total)

"Canon's entry-level Rebel is a very affordable $500 with kit lens. It's not at the head of its class in terms of technology, but does its budget-friendly price tag make up for that? Well, that depends on what you're looking for"...

Spare the bandwidth...

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 10:49 UTC as 31st comment
On article Hands-on with Hasselblad X1D (811 comments in total)

Well, this is a brave effort..!

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2016 at 09:48 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies

It's a very serious professional tool for specific tasks, delivers awfully well in these cases and it is highly appreciated from the guys who use it. In these cases delivers better than any other competent. And now it is offered in great price. Bad? Not at all...

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2016 at 09:44 UTC as 16th comment
Total: 577, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »