aris14

aris14

Lives in Greece Athens, Greece
Joined on Jan 3, 2005

Comments

Total: 566, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Great publicity for Canon...

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 10:06 UTC as 10th comment

I am sure it is an excellent piece of glass.
But in our days is it really a need, given the existing software?

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2016 at 10:04 UTC as 64th comment | 3 replies
On article Nikon D500 versus D750: Which one is right for you? (312 comments in total)

What is the purpose of this topic in a photographic forum...?

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2016 at 11:19 UTC as 22nd comment | 2 replies

A must have in voyeur's arsenal...

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2016 at 08:32 UTC as 44th comment
On article Bentley creates a 53 billion pixel car commercial (188 comments in total)

Any publicity is good publicity...

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2016 at 09:01 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

photogeek: Came here to check if they'll jack up the price even more. Was not disappointed.

Fortunately they did not introduce a titanium or iridium version.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2016 at 09:01 UTC
In reply to:

odpisan: For that price I can buy Pentax 645 Z with best lenses.

I think that quality of photos wouldn't be worth mentioning.

With all my respect I would like to make 2 remarks.
Medium format is not just better it is far better in most cases comparing to IQ of FF sensors.
But when prints are more than 8-10 ft, i.e 20 - 30 ft it's all a matter of post processing because we look at those images from a at least 30 ft.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2016 at 08:59 UTC

Is it about the cams or their underwater housings?

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2016 at 08:38 UTC as 13th comment
On article Accusations fly over Fukushima photos (88 comments in total)

There are some more important things that need our attention....

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2016 at 08:36 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
On article Comparison Review: Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA vs 55mm F1.8 ZA (225 comments in total)

High precision exercises to justify the obvious: Different glasses aiming at different purposes even at a slightly different niche.
Given that both lenses are to be used for high end photography sometimes I think that post processing can deliver desired results at a fragment of cost and no one will ever notice.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2016 at 08:33 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

AshMills: Equivalence police- that's 16-32mm f1.6-2.4 and 30-60mm 1.6-2.4 to you.

Make up your mind with these numbers or else I won't buy any of those lenses...

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2016 at 09:34 UTC
In reply to:

odpisan: For that price I can buy Pentax 645 Z with best lenses.

I think that quality of photos wouldn't be worth mentioning.

One apple plus one monkey don't sum up two pineapples...

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2016 at 09:30 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-Pro2 versus X-T2: Seven key differences (353 comments in total)

In the most popular section of comments there is only one that followed from other comments. All others are answers to indifferent comments.

Link | Posted on Jul 18, 2016 at 09:39 UTC as 21st comment
On article Sony Planar T* FE 50mm F1.4 ZA Sample Gallery (267 comments in total)

No matter how good this glass is, and it is as I can see, overpricing has its limits.
Btw does anyone knows if Sony has the Minolta's R&D team in lens design?

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2016 at 10:56 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On article Special K? Pentax K-1 Review (2610 comments in total)

Most people comments are looking at the tree and they cannot see the forest.
As they always do...

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 10:50 UTC as 117th comment
In reply to:

Miron09: for portrait I prefer MFT because bigger sensors reveal too much unwanted detail. like pimples. So unless you have a make up artist by your side, better stay away from MF/FF

They sure do, buy one, it's a collectors item...

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2016 at 08:25 UTC

A picture has to be untouched only for reporting and documentary purposes, apart minor enhancement touches aiming to "clear out" the subject (brightness, contrast, saturation, some cast removal perhaps and minor selective touch if needed).

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:29 UTC as 8th comment

This camera is beautiful because this camera is right.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:20 UTC as 34th comment
In reply to:

Loro Husk: The amount of detail is amazing, maybe even too much! At 100% you can see every inperfection...

Worse comment than women's seeing their image in 1:1 magnification in monitors.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:16 UTC
In reply to:

Miron09: for portrait I prefer MFT because bigger sensors reveal too much unwanted detail. like pimples. So unless you have a make up artist by your side, better stay away from MF/FF

Care about a Minolta D-image delivering 1,1 Mp files..?

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2016 at 10:11 UTC
Total: 566, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »