MirrorLessHater

why would a manufacturer develop apsc and FF lenses if the profit from FF lenses is 5x as much as apsc lenses ?

crazy how there is a possibility i can spent the last years of my life in mars.
this is mind blowing.

i'm happy canon killed the ergonomics argument for good.
now only the color science is left.

this price point is only achievable in mirrorless, good job canon.
i'm sure sony will consider an ALPHA 5 FF.

you will get real time eyeAF, but not real time tracking.

i prefer dealing with jacked up colors over horribly Misfocused photos.

Nano-update :D

i thought this real-time tracking to be good but not to the point it leapfrogs nikon's 3D tracking.

second half of 2019

Sony went from unusable AF in 2013 to an industry leading AF in just 5 years,
good job Sony for creating E-mount, the best camera system ever created. good job for your amazing lenses, also good...

the X-Pro3 is next.

I thought ibis is useless and degrade image quality.

@MikeRan Ironic how a $6000 flagship sport bodies lack eye-AF.

fuji eye-AF is good but far behind sonys.

i would get the fuji anytime.
please don't kill me lol.

no.

i prefer dealing with banding issues rather than slow DFD AF.

TowerJazz lol

@Ebrahim Saadawi
monstro costs 60000$
venice costs 42000$
also the venice destroyed the monstro in iso iq and skin tones.

@Clint Dunn because leica SL owners are rich, and they don't wait sigma to release affordable L-MOUNT lenses ?