Powerdoc

You seems to prefer ultra luminous lenses. If ultraluminous lenses are not mandatory, the XF 10-24 is a very good zoom for landscape photography Otherwise, the 16 1,4 , the 23 1,4 are very good ...

he shot in raw, and use Lightroom via the default output setting. Concerning colors he made some observations - on some subjects the color rendition was the same - for portraits the Sony has a ...

Sorry it's in french but the comment are not really important to see by your self the difference of colors between the Fuji and the Sony A7 3 in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG0W34kX_kI

For those who might be concerned by the high iso performance of the XT3, here is an unprocessed pic of one of my cat with the XT3 F2 50 mm F2 WR, 12800 isos, LED light (artificial) . Absolutely no ...

here an exemple in JPEG at 12800 from DPR : for me the XT3 is the winner : more noise, but more details

The right image is overprocessed : on a print the left image will bring you a far better result. Considering the difference of sensor size, it's normal

If your ask between this two camera, just wait for the X-H3 ...

according to canon white paper about the eos R system, the 24-105 RL is slighty better than the 24-105 f4 LIS V2 at 24 mm and it's the reverse at 105 mm-- Overall they are on par, but the R is more ...

We don't know, if Canon  has made some changes in the AF protocol (the R mount have more connector than the EF mount) there should be some issues requiring a firmware update I hope it's not the ...

It's not only that The R introduce 2 of the best Canon lenses ever : the 50 1,2 RL and the 28-70 2 RL. They are very expansive and are perhaps the best 50 mm ultraluminous prime and the best trans ...

it's a very bad test A landscape city shot with a lot of heat haze and may  be atmospheric pollution. In both pics , the building are blurry.

You are right, it's not a scientific IQ and DR comparison. I can't make any conclusions between this two shots, of a city landscape with high atmospheric turbulences.

There is also a test (who need some verifications) that shows an huge improvement in jpeg at 12800 isos It's in the video at 12 minutes (portrait) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO_E6PVDZ2I

There was a comparison between the two cameras, and frankly I could not tell the difference. At best perhaps there is a 1/6 stop difference at the advantage of the XT3 compared to the XT2, but ...

Thank you for your insight So designed by Fuji, produced by an another company

Yes it's a stellar lens , the best sharpness possible in the Fujifilm line of lenses. The bokey is also awesome. The only cons, 6000 $ : it's expansive for an APS C only lens.

I have got the 23 mm F2 lens : it's sharp even wide open on the whole frame. It's very fast for AF and very well built. Highly recommanded

I can't agree more.

For still photography, you will get - some minor ergonomics improvement (dials, lock for the dioptric ...) - 160 iso native instead of 200 and perhaps better DR (that's what said the firsts tests, ...

My point, is that according to Bclaff's charts, the T2 sensor behave differently than other Sony captors. Fuji claim to design their own sensors, and in my humble opinion, the Bclaff's test seems ...