Powerdoc

From tests I have read : IBIS equivalent in still photography, but better with the XT4 for video

I will recieve one tuesday I should be able to compare it with my XF 35 1.4. The XT3 is a nice upgrade AF wise, but the XF 35 1.4 is still noisy. It's vintage.

It seems that there is a decentering issue. The right part of the pic is soft even at F5,6. At F5,6 this lens should be sharp from the center to the corner.

High Iso pics under bad light are always soft. Test you lens on tripod at base ISO. The 23 mm F2 is a fine lens

I used to have a 10D
It was the first digital camera, that bring me pleasure to shoot with.
Before I had several digital cameras with small sensor, that did not bring me much pleasure (very...

24 Mp sound nice, considering that the lack of information about the number of pixels, means a disapointment

Now the better ISO department means a new generation of sensor (and not only a new...

I am a bit surprised, that Canon give very precise specs (number of AF sensor, 20 fps .... ) but said nothing about the number of pixels of this new camera.
Did you ask Canon representative, why...

XT20 and XH1 have both the same sensor, and the same colors engine. The 16-80 is an "all around " zoom, an enhanced version of the 16-50 (more light, more reach, better build, better AF, OIS ...

What lens did he used on the XT3 ? The best UW lens (even in the center of the image) is the big 8-16 mm F2,8 . Different lenses could result in slighty different results.

I have both lenses on my R, and in most case I use the 24-105 RL . For me the 24-105 L is a perfect travel lens. It's one lens allowing to take 90 % of the shots I want.

The XT30 is a smaller, lighter and cheaper version of the XT3. It's a better camera than an XT2 (even if it lack some features, like the dual slot) The Sensor, the Image processor is as good than ...

Dépending of the choice made by the company, more pixel, or less noise per pixel. Noisie is not an issue at base iso (even a very small sensor can do the job) , but make the difference  at hight iso.

Better understanding of physics. Exposure is the same, but more light translate in less noisie with equal technology for the same number of photosites.

yes bigger sensor recieve more light, it's absotely true. But bigger sensor does not recieve more light per square millimiter : the intensity stay the same.

The 33 mm F1.0 in proportion , size , and target (Fuji's premium lenses) is very similar than the Fujinon 8-16. Perhaps it will have the same amount of exotic glass. So I am guessing that the ...