Powerdoc

Compared to the XT1, the XT2 have : - 50 % more pixels - more Dynamic range - one more stop in the high iso department . In jpeg, 6400 isos from a XT2 is as good than 3200 isos for the XT1 - better ...

A typical JPEG is 8 EV of Dynamic range. depending on the setting, the gamma curve applied to tranform RAW to JPEG differ (and you have various setting to change it on each camera) So you transform ...

The next lenses (in 2017) will be the 50 mm F2 and the macro 80 F2,8. No road map for a 200 mm or a 135.

Well it's not possible to use an X pro with a big zoom via OVF. If you are an action shooter, there is nothing better than the action reflex : like the D500, the 7dmk2, or the D5 or 1dxMK2. The ...

For landscape , you should also consider the 10-24 : as sharp as the 14 and 16 stopped down , and is stabilised. In fact depending on what you shoot, my personnal choice will be the 16 (because ...

the 18-55 and the 55-200 are a great travel combo , weighting 2 pounds, 3 with the camera. You can add a fast prime, like the 56 1,2 mm or 23 1,4

yes only in JPEG. One stop in RAW would have been a miracle, a revolution in technology. That's said, I have done a few shots at home, and I find that the XT2's 6400 iso 20/13 inch are pretty good. ...

I second that. When I am in Holidays in family or with a group, the zoom is a must go. The image stabilisation and the zooming allowing you, to take pictures of various subjects in a very short time.

Thanks for this test I have already the 35 1,4 The APD seems to be a very specialised lens. The 56 1,2 is more versatile (it's a very fast lens for low light situation, like concert) and the 90 mm ...

Impressive results for such a wide aperture But there is a lot of noise on the beige car. Did you lift up the shadow a lot ?

Nice pic The D4S is great in low light, and I did not expected that the XT2 could do the same, but it's still very good for an APS C sensor. Your pic is quite noisy, but the level of details is great

it's strange Only the foliage are affected by these weirdness, and not every where, despite a shutter speed of 1/2000 It can't be IS, or the whole picture will be affected I don't see why it would ...

It's good for you I hope, you will enjoy it.

I live in France, and for me it's seems to be just the contrary : the vertial grip is on the way, but not the XT2. I would prefer the reverse

Thanks for the news, I will watch it It's good for me, because I have pre ordered the XT2 (and the booster grip).

I wll look the video at home, because my soundcard of my comuter is broken. But is it fair to compare a 100 4OO, to a 200-400 F4 , 3 times more expansive ?

It was a pre production camera (for the X pro2). Any conclusion should be made only with a production camera.

I have both the 18-55 and the 16-55, but  I recommand the 18-55 : lighter (especially on a xpro body, allowing you to use OVF) , it has IS, and is as almost if not as good IQ wise than the 16-55.

The F1,4 is bigger , slower AF, is not WR, cost more, but have a better bokey at F1,4 , but also at F2 (some onions rings with the 2 WR) https://ivanjoshualoh.com/2016/08/25/23mm-vs-23mm-sibling-ri ...