Joined on May 17, 2006


Total: 44, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

nerd2: Digital already surpasses film in every aspects (resolution, dynamic range, noise) and can closely simulate any film we had. I think we should ban film photography, just for environmental reasons.

After all the fuss about "The Dark Knight" being shot on film, the final result was a tremendously over-processed, trendily-graded digital look. All of the "benefits" of shooting on film are for all practical purposes non-existant to the viewer. So I say, as with still photography, evolve or die. (I shot and processed film for over 30 years. Enough is enough!)

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2014 at 11:46 UTC
On article Adobe CC Announcements: What you need to know (181 comments in total)

I use Lightroom 75% of the time for my workflow. If they go to subscription-only with it, screw them. And Lightroom for ios only? As I said, screw them. (Because they ARE screwing us, no matter how one attempts to rationalize it.)

Link | Posted on Jun 19, 2014 at 11:12 UTC as 27th comment | 4 replies
On article Olympus Tough TG-3 real-world samples gallery (46 comments in total)

I've had a Lumix TS2 for a few years now that's been diving, skiing, and through a whole host of activities. Wouldn't trade it for any of these- even my friend's TS5, which seems to have an inferior lens. Mine's sharp as hell.

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 22:00 UTC as 7th comment
On article High-end pocketable compacts roundup (2013) (261 comments in total)

I have the LF1 and absolutely love it. I'm a pro, and I know a sharp lens when I see one, and this camera HAS one. I don't understand all the complaining about the EVF, because it's highly usable and more than adequate. Panasonic keeps NR to a minimum, unlike Sony, and the flash performance produces amazingly consistent results- unlike Canon, (I must say!) The video performance is nearly as good as Sony's. So, in other words, buy one, carry it, and use it. You won't be sorry.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2014 at 17:31 UTC as 60th comment | 3 replies
On article Nikon Df Review (1620 comments in total)

It looks like an abomination. Handles like a Nikon. (Clumsily.) Feels cheap. And is overpriced.
Canon- take note- produce a digital FTb or F-1 that takes EOS lenses and eschews the "melted-down" look, and I'm there.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 21:32 UTC as 237th comment | 3 replies
On article Swimming with the Nikon 1 AW1 (193 comments in total)

I'll stick with my Panasonic TS2. Low noise reduction. Sharp lens. Good video. Built like a tank. Pocket-sized. After many ski trips and kyaking adventures, it's still going strong. Strange jpg noise structure, but that's Panasonic. Seems like the newer versions of it have inferior optics and greater noise supression going on, based on the reviews. I'll use mine until it croaks. This Nikon? Not for that money.

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2013 at 03:12 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Review (611 comments in total)

Love the fact that manufacturers are wising-up and putting EVFs in, but these cameras end up so big, I might as well carry my Rebel- and my trusty Sony WX10 for awesome video, for plinking. Now IF it had a mic/ headphone jack...

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 13:01 UTC as 158th comment
On article Hands-on with the retro Nikon Df (231 comments in total)

What a disappointment. It looks like some bloated Zenit-like knockoff. Silly indeed. And the price? This has flop stamped on its forehead. Look to Olympus and even Pentax for classy, neo-retro, functional DSLRs. Nikon's in trouble, imo.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 11:48 UTC as 26th comment
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1391 comments in total)

If it were up to me, it would have NO LCD screen. You want retro? That's retro. Wait until you download 'em until you can see 'em. There's your "filmic" experience! Damn camera would be cheaper too...

Link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 21:23 UTC as 108th comment | 4 replies
On article 5 new must-have photo editing apps (100 comments in total)

So tired of the "bad SX-70" look. Suppose it's new to generation Z, but I experienced it for real in the analog days- and hated it then! Also- now we have to put up with the same, cliched, desaturated/crossover look in many motion pictures too... ad nauseum. Sigh...

Link | Posted on Oct 13, 2013 at 16:48 UTC as 49th comment | 1 reply

No EVF. No sale.

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2013 at 01:26 UTC as 44th comment | 4 replies

Adobe flexes their monopoly muscle and it smacks of extortion. Extortion aimed at loyal and professional users. Disgusting. Lightroom I will reluctantly continue to use, but they can take their "CC" and shove it. Just another Big Brother ploy spun as being for "your benefit." BS!!

Link | Posted on May 16, 2013 at 14:23 UTC as 82nd comment

Surviving in the industry has been tough enough without this display of utter corporate greed and arrogance from a company we'vd all come to rely on- for better or worse. And the spin they're trying to put on it (that it's BETTER for US this way??) is not only disgusting, but insults the intelligence of photographers everywhere.
WE can make a difference here. Keep making your opinions known everyone!

Link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 13:52 UTC as 480th comment

The back on the stupid thing is ALL touch screen- impossible to hold. AND overpriced. They can keep it.

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2013 at 14:41 UTC as 9th comment | 4 replies

What are the guys at Canon smoking?? As great as my Galaxy S3 camera is, what's the point of this thing? This will be looked back upon as one of Canon's biggest missteps ever in a couple of years.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:21 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic launches DMC-TS5 waterproof Wi-Fi compact (12 comments in total)

The TS1 and 2 are GREAT! If you're looking for an all-weather machine- BUY ONE when available. Don't even bother with Olympus. These machines have vastly sharper optics and many other excellent features.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:18 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply

I have a Q and I can't say enough good things about it. The "small sensor" argument cracks me up- I've shots events with mine with an external flash and it comes through with flying colors, even at high ISOs. (I've been a working pro for 35 years and it's a relief to not haul the Canon gear once in a while!)
Not a big fan of the new design, but as long as it comes in black, I'm happy...

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:13 UTC as 7th comment

My votes are out on the new design, but all I know is that I shot a whole event with my Q and external flash- just to see if it could be done. Not only did I have fellow photographers raving over the design of the camera, but also over the results I posted. I WISH my Canon pro gear featured the amount of customization the Q has!
Therefore, all the naysayers can go stick it, IMHO.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2012 at 15:30 UTC as 4th comment

In the late 90's, Olympus made the C211z. It was a brilliant design which wrote a digital image to Polaroid type 500 Captiva/Vision film with a micro-LED array. It produced excellent images. The camera had only a 2mp sensor, but it was one of the best 2mp sensors anywhere ath the time- I even printed 8x10s from it. (Including the official photo of the mayor of the city I worked for at the time!) It had a 3:1 zoom and a foolproof flash exposure system. It's too bad Polaroid wasn't in financial shape to produce a 3x4 version of it, because it would have been wildly sucessful. These cameras seem to have horrible fixed-focus lense, though the zinc system IS quite impressive. (Developed by former Polaroid technicians, I believe.) The lens and the price are deal-breakers for me. Too bad, because I taught myself photography on my grandfather's roll-film Polaroid 800. AND I have a Polaroid collection- a soft spot, I have... so I might buy one anyhow! ;)

Link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 14:37 UTC as 17th comment
Total: 44, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »