demaio

Nikon colors were in fact more "accurate" too in my case, but who cares! :)

I agree with Ken Rockwell, Fuji colors are very nice for people pictures (portraits), but are slyghtly pale-ish for places and things. I'd like to try Fuji GFX100 though :)

Of course! But I prefer Canon "out of the box" JPEG colors to any other brand. That's what I wanted to say :)

I forgot to mention: first shot was taken with Nikon. Thought it would be obvious, that green-ish cast..

And here is why.

In fact, best Nikon 50mm f1.8 pancake lens is NOT Nikkor 50mm f/2 AI but Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 AI-S. Here is Ken Rockwell's review: https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/50mm-f18-ais-pancake.htm

Wellcome to DPR forums! Seems like a wrong forum to start topic. There is special " Camera, Lens and System Buying Advice " forum for such threads IMO.

larkhon, gladly!
1) Z5 is $1400 while RP is $900
2) RP works with ALL EF lenses WITH autofocus, while Z5 won't autofocus most cheap old (AF and AF-D) lenses

wjan, you use RP for what? Show us some of your work, please.

Good review from technical point of view, but only for those who shoot charts hand held in dim light.
I shoot portraits and am FAR better suited by Canon RP.

Swerky, all EF lenses are autofocus, you can't have manual focus EF mount lenses.

That's why I never watch them. All so called "influencers" are biased in some way or another. If I need to make an opinion about some new gear I first read Ken Rockwell and then rent it and try out ...

I want a Nikon camera that can mount Canon lenses. Period.
Canon lenses are better and cheaper in general, all EF lenses have AF motor.
I'm not interested in RF lenses for now, they are crazy...

Ugly as hell ergonomically disastrous double the price of eos rp.
Ken Rockwell is so right.