demaio

demaio

Works as a Software developer
Has a website at https://500px.com/demaio
Joined on Dec 24, 2015
About me:

Seasoned hobby shooter

Comments

Total: 99, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

demaio: Good review from technical point of view, but only for those who shoot charts hand held in dim light.
I shoot portraits and am FAR better suited by Canon RP.

larkhon, gladly!
1) Z5 is $1400 while RP is $900
2) RP works with ALL EF lenses WITH autofocus, while Z5 won't autofocus most cheap old (AF and AF-D) lenses

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2020 at 13:52 UTC
In reply to:

demaio: Good review from technical point of view, but only for those who shoot charts hand held in dim light.
I shoot portraits and am FAR better suited by Canon RP.

wjan, you use RP for what? Show us some of your work, please.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2020 at 12:59 UTC

Good review from technical point of view, but only for those who shoot charts hand held in dim light.
I shoot portraits and am FAR better suited by Canon RP.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2020 at 10:38 UTC as 71st comment | 18 replies
In reply to:

Swerky: This looks like a photographer’s dream camera. I guess 24mpx is enough for most people, specially at this price point. I have a couple of EF mount manual focus lenses that’ll fit right in being adapted and find much better use with ibis and focus peaking. When it comes to autofocus lenses, I wonder if I should keep on adapting more EF lenses like a 24-105, a 40mm f2.8 or go native Z mount. On one part it’s a matter of native vs adapted lens performance, on another part a simple matter of lens choice.

Swerky, all EF lenses are autofocus, you can't have manual focus EF mount lenses.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2020 at 10:33 UTC
On article Nikon Z6 II and Z7 II coming October 14 (926 comments in total)

I want a Nikon camera that can mount Canon lenses. Period.
Canon lenses are better and cheaper in general, all EF lenses have AF motor.
I'm not interested in RF lenses for now, they are crazy expensive.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2020 at 07:18 UTC as 39th comment | 5 replies
On article Sony a7C review: Compact size, big sensor image quality (2234 comments in total)

Ugly as hell ergonomically disastrous double the price of eos rp.
Ken Rockwell is so right.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2020 at 16:09 UTC as 300th comment | 20 replies

Future is bright and beautiful!

Link | Posted on Mar 19, 2020 at 15:28 UTC as 14th comment

Why won't Fujifilm probably make a full-frame X100?
Because they need to produce favipiravir (drug against coronavirus) first.
And then, they need to develop a full frame digital rangefinder - "a poor man Leica".

Link | Posted on Mar 19, 2020 at 12:16 UTC as 27th comment

Why on Earth would I wand COMPACT film camera?

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2020 at 14:37 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply

Told ya Sony is a PlayStation and movie company!

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2020 at 10:07 UTC as 49th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Eden_808: As a Sony user, this camera looks amazing. Competition is good and this will hopefully influence Sony's plans for A74 and A7siii. Let's just wait and see if Canon finds a way to cripple it.

As a Sony user I use Sony PlayStation myself.
However when I need camera or lens I buy Canon. Or Nikon.

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2020 at 14:44 UTC

R.I.P Sony :)

Link | Posted on Feb 14, 2020 at 08:04 UTC as 88th comment | 2 replies

Shut up and just take my money!

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2020 at 14:17 UTC as 196th comment
On article Hands-on with the new Fujifilm X100V (177 comments in total)

Not only it's a double crop camera, it's as ugly as a soap-box, with overkill price!

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2020 at 12:03 UTC as 34th comment | 5 replies
On article Why Leica's M10 Monochrom is more than just a gimmick (666 comments in total)

My dog would order one of these for sure if she could read. Ha ha.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2020 at 11:21 UTC as 36th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon D3500 review (418 comments in total)
In reply to:

demaio: I understand that Amazon has to sell these cameras.
But why should I as a customer use such an outdated tool?
Just because of its price?
11 AF points? Really? Bad AF with fast primes typical for all DSLRs. Poor video..
Why on earth should I use it instead of SONY 6000?

WolfpackN64, wrong.
iPhone is very versatile and video is 4K.
Michiel wrote about "good pictures".

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2020 at 14:10 UTC
On article Nikon D3500 review (418 comments in total)
In reply to:

demaio: I understand that Amazon has to sell these cameras.
But why should I as a customer use such an outdated tool?
Just because of its price?
11 AF points? Really? Bad AF with fast primes typical for all DSLRs. Poor video..
Why on earth should I use it instead of SONY 6000?

Michiel953, my iPhone is VERY capable of taking good pictures. So does everybody's smartphone nowadays.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2020 at 13:08 UTC
On article Nikon D3500 review (418 comments in total)

I understand that Amazon has to sell these cameras.
But why should I as a customer use such an outdated tool?
Just because of its price?
11 AF points? Really? Bad AF with fast primes typical for all DSLRs. Poor video..
Why on earth should I use it instead of SONY 6000?

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2020 at 09:17 UTC as 34th comment | 12 replies

DSLRs are not quite dead )

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2020 at 13:26 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon D780 Review (1194 comments in total)

Another "solid performer" from Nikon that no one needs with ridiculous price.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2020 at 12:50 UTC as 184th comment | 1 reply
Total: 99, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »