jboyer

Thanks, Marco. Looks like a keeper to me. I have the 16-35mm L F4 attached to my M50. Bulky and heavy. I noticed I tend to use the 28-35 range a lot and often at F4 or 5.6. I take pictures of kids ...

is the 24-70 a kit lens? It also 2 3x zoom vs a 4.3 x for the 24-105... the xtra 1x has a cost.

I am wondering how optimized is the ACR for this combination. RAW conversion may introduce softness.

Troll needs a new screen. These look fuzzy on my 640x480...

Looking good. I see F2 in most of the pictures. Did you try 1.4 and decided not to post? Are these out of te camera jpgs? It looks like a very capable lens. And your B&W are vey pleasant.

Club Fuji? I like the format.

Well, the 50mm 1.2 is deemed to be spectacular. That ticks the better lenses. (And the 24-104 isn't bad either.) And done at launch time. You can test it in a few weeks and report on this forum ...

Please show some market share and sales volume to help understand the size of the sieve. No camera is slow or fast seller based on ONE feature. Most buyer look a the camera, not a the sum of ...

Marco, Utah in the Western US, is worth a LONG trip. We have been visiting there for twenty years and I wish we could return now. It is an alien world with unique formations (not unlike some in ...

I have a 4k Spectre from HP. It looks very good.

Thanks, Marco. The 22mm is a little gem, and I am waiting for some $$ to get the newer addition - with the hope the price will be discounted soon! There is some magic in using an M50 and the 22 - ...

Very good (early) pictures with M6 and EF lenses. Just curious, Marco, would you expect some differences between the M6 and M50 with the same lenses? Every time I put an EF lens on the M50, I am ...

Lake Louise AB - the lake color is stunning, but was a challenge to render.

Thanks, Marco Being lazy, I did not check how many posts were written along the lines when the M was introduced: Canon missed it again. A poor offering, too slow, bad this or that... moving to ...

1965 First HOME camcorder Sony 220 lines resolution at $695 In today's dollars: $5,491. $1,500 is buying you PRO 4k, and MANY features, including lightweight, not available in 1965. It does not ...

I am looking for Christmas gifts for my children and a used M50 or M100 discarded by a someone who left for SONY would be a welcome buy. Because these cameras are so bad, I expect to pay $20 for ...

Too bad Capture One is not being used. Beta ACR may not be the best RAW rendering engine for the R, at this point.

Professional Video Camera 4 K In many posts, it was noted that Canon may not have the technology to deal with 4k video, like in the M50 and R cameras where it is deemed 'crippled'. While I can ...

Just like Formula 1 cars! The word plastic seems used as NOT METAL. Not clear if it is as robust as a similar metal one would be. Very few stats on that! My issue is that the price point should ...