morinor

Of course that it is true. I just mentioned what are the attributes of the lenses in order to get equivalent results. Distances also taking their places on the equation. But I am talkin about ...

On the same light conditions the same settings will be given either by a APS-C or a FF camera. The difference though is that at the same ISO and f-stop the image will result with more noise and ...

Yes a Fuji with an 55-200 f/3.5-4.8 OIS should be compared with a D750 and a Nikkor AF-P 70-300 f/4.5-6.3. If it brings similar quality the Fuji wins regarding size and weight. For this you are ...

Compared to N version as far as I know, the only difference is that on the S you can attach a metal lens hood. There was also the Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4 Nokton SL II (without any letter) which had ...

For the focal length I suppose you mistyped and wanted to say 75-150mm. Of course I didn't say it that the physical ratio has changed. At the same conditions you will set the same shutter speed, ...

I have seen that there were also other focal lengths a few years ago, that now seem to be discontinued. I was curious about Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL. It has also come into my mind to get one ...

Correct me if I have misunderstood. They used only eight people as sample. 7 of 8 more at about 40 or more years old.
Also I now learned for Blipfoto, a site claiming:
"Life is worth celebrating,...

-complete? Sure we are talking about problem.

Also something that I forgot. If you do not mind that it has no image stabilization, a Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 would be great choice for low light shooting with a DX. It is equivalent to an 75-150mm ...

I think you have to think if you value more one stop advantage on your lens or the weight and size. The one stop advantage means less DoF, cleaner images due to usage of lower ISO and being ...

ISO on sports has to do with the need of high shutter speeds under relatively low light. On normal sunny days, this is irrelevant. A "sports" camera though as you state has to fulfill also other ...

These photos are on the verge to be printed on a small poster size (11" x 17"), let alone on a medium poster (18" x 24"), as the grain and loss of sharpness become obvious. Of course if you had a ...

By having a Lowepro Fastpack 250 AW II , I would highly recommended it as a backpack with easy access on your gear for you and some difficulty for the others. It fits my D750, a 70-200mm f/2.8 ...

These raw numbers, should be taken of course with a grain of salt. They have are representing something that DxOMark has defined and as all say, they represent nothing to define the result of a ...

I would agree with most here that say that the Nikon 18-200 is just for the convenience. Do you want need 18-200mm lens, then just get. Maybe it is more trustworthy than other third party lenses. ...

I have the Tamron 70-200 G2 for a few months now. I am still exploring it as it has given me some different aspects. When it is stopped down on f/4 or f/5.6 it is very sharp. I had though to focus ...

Full Frame aka sensor with similar size as a 35mm film.

I hope when it is going to be released it will catch with time and come with enough lenses.
Then most probably this year we will have a D610 and/or D750 replacement. I hope for a camera with just...

I have a similar consern. Generally a Nikon P900 can be a good choice as being a lightweight solution with a 2000mm equivalent lens. But this means also that a tripod or monopod are needed to be ...

There are just better thirdparty 35mm lenses than Nikon 35mm f/1.8G, with more reasonable value than Nikon 35mm f/1.4G. You should avoid them if you do not want to focus calibrate them. Not ...