morinor

So it is a fit machine also. That is added value. Just cancelled my preorder for my weight lifts. :-P

I agree. It is something similar with the new Canon 28-70mm f/2. It becomes difficult to carry around such heavy lenses. You should have something like a monopod to carry it around. So in my ...

Of course this is natural as ML cover those that are in need of what ML offers. The market is new and attract many. Especially after so many manufacturers have been move to it. They couldn't ...

I agree with the first point, but not completely with the second. The first shows that an automation advancement is not always in need. It can actually also can have some side effects. About the ...

From leak information, it seems to be a totally different optical formula. It is heavier and wider as a lens, which we have to see how this will be translated regarding IQ. Other good things are ...

Yes it seems the 40mm is heavy but it is rumored to be a Cine like implementation. So it cannot substitute the 35mm with half the weight (1200gr vs 665gr). It can have much better regarding IQ and ...

I have to say that mosswings is most correct, but about the probability of using Auto-ISO can be more common that he thinks. Generally it depends on how somebody shoots and what he shoots. For ...

I agree, OP should mention what you seek to improve or what you have seen that a newer camera will bring to you. Based on the lens also, and your again for a superzoom, you do not seem to be ...

These are not so much exciting as focal lengths. Still can be preffered by some if they want something wider or tighter than a 35mm. It would be interesing to see how they compare against the 35mm ...

Most probably a replacement of 50-500mm of Sigma. For whichever found that lens useful it can find also this one. I expect to be better one, but it shouldn't be better than a 150-600mm.

We have to see what Sigma has done. I do not think that there is no improvement after so many years. We have to wait when it will be released and tested, how it compares against Tamron. My guess ...

I do not want to talk about the features, handling etc. If somebody has the money to spend for just different handling, it can be OK. Otherwise the camera is overpriced. About the IQ that you ...

Rio No-Z Area

And not so much with the number of points, as which is the total area of the AF module. Edge to edge AF is in reality a marketing trick. A 60-70% of total is enough in my opinion. Also we have to ...

Just in order to know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_range As I have said it is related, but not the same do not get confused or confuse ...

Still this is Dynamic Range and not noise. Dynamic range can be affected, but it is not the same. The following is a more appropriate view: https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Niko ...

That is READ noise. Meaning noise produced by electronics. It doesn't count in noise produced by the smaller sensor.

Then you can get something like this: http://www.red.com/products/dsmc2

@TheUpsideDown
Are you a US government agent?
https://www.iridium.com/products/iridium-9575a-government/

https://www.cameralabs.com/nikon-af-p-70-300mm-f4-5-5-6e-ed-vr-review/2/ In my opinion the Tamron is a great choice for APS-C bodies. Good quality and constant f/4. But if you compare the images, ...