egk4260

Sorry for the struggles. I think I will just stay with XQD!

How did this turn out? Hopefully they just refunded your purchase without the restocking fee and allowed you to move on. Did they push to replace the bad card with another?

They did mention they used significantly more powerful PC than Mac and that intent was to show time differences between C1 and LR, not to compare computer platforms. It is pretty obvious that a...

That is a different camera, but I think AFC in general is different than the AFC continuous focus in video mode that needed the pulse motor. The answer to “compatible” is certainly not readily ...

Thanks for link. Interesting that that FAQ page is not on Ricoh US site and the relevant info is either missing or well hidden in both lens and body manuals. https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/faq/

Can either of you reference where in the manual to find that list. The AF section for movie says “with compatible” lenses (p64) but does not define. The appendix lists DA lenses as supported for ...

Of course similar questions do arise, but note his safari was in February 2019.

The Pentax has about 10% higher pixel count in vertical and horizontal dimensions. Not sure at what point that begins to appear as “much higher resolution” in images at the sizes we view them at. ...

I agree the module sounds more advanced. I would expect superior technology and specs for the AF module in a K3-III that is 4 years newer and currently twice the cost of a D7500, but the question ...

So Pentax decisively wins the spec wars. Are the actual results demonstrating how that superiority plays out? Be careful. Users of any camera system tend to downplay the importance of specs, until ...

I don’t at all doubt that Fuji had their own design philosophies, was just commenting that if Nikon produces a camera which is essentially a clone of a 30-40 year old Nikon body, and some random ...

Perhaps Fuji owed that to Nikon given Fuji’s Nikon look in days gone by, but I think in looking at the images right here in the DPR “First Look” that Nikon had another camera in mind. If the Zfc ...

Does he not agree with you?: “For the Pentax loyalists out there, the K-3 III is a great upgrade option.” and “The K-3 III is a great choice for existing Pentax owners.” He then talks about the ...

Curious as to his/her decision. If staying with Nikon, and APS-C, and DSLR, and that level of AF performance the D500 was obviously more relevant than the other options. A lot has transpired with ...

Can’t it then just be accepted that the K3-III is affected by shutter shock in some situations just like most(all) cameras with mechanical shutters. Perhaps, as suggested, expansion of EFCS can be...

I think that is universal for all brands. We all obviously own the best offerings in any category, wouldn’t even consider anything less given our discriminating expectations. Reviewers must be very ...

May be very important in imaging orbiting extraterrestrials! Problem with the Sonys has been rapid failure in space, being not even able to handle the environmental conditions on Earth; and menu ...

I guess you are correct in regards to still focus for landscapes. But, kudos for an exceptionally artful dodge of actually responding to my post. Politics are certainly an option if the ...

As I read it your perceptions seem to differ with what they actually stated: K1-III: "Limited AF point coverage, Unreliable AF tracking" "The camera's 33 autofocus points are concentrated toward ...

In the interest of properly attributing previous statements and interpretations: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/k-3-3/feature/03.html https://www.ephotozine.com/article/pentax-hd-p ...